设为首页 | 加入收藏
网站首页 本刊简介 编委会 投稿指南 过刊浏览 广告合作 网上订购 下载专区 联系我们  
公务员工作投入与心理幸福感的关系:有中介的调节模型
作者:王羽  史占彪  周启帆 
单位:1. 中国科学院心理研究所  北京 100101 2. 中国科学院大学  北京 100049 
关键词:工作投入 家长式领导 心理韧性 心理幸福感 公务员 
分类号:R395.6
出版年,卷(期):页码:2017,25(6):1109-1113
摘要:

目的:探讨我国公务员工作投入与心理幸福感的关系,仁慈、德行、威权三类家长式领导风格在其中的调节作用及心理韧性对该调节的中介效应。方法:使用中文版Utrecht工作投入量表(UWES)、家长式领导量表、Con-nor-Davidson心理韧性量表(CD-RISC)中文版和Ryff心理幸福感量表中文修订版,对411名公务员施测。结果:控制相关协变量后:①工作投入能显著正向预测公务员心理幸福感(γ=0.28,P<0.001);②德行领导对工作投入与心理幸福感的关系具正向调节作用(γ=0.08,P=0.029),且通过心理韧性的完全中介实现;威权领导具负向调节作用(γ=-0.17,P<0.001),通过心理韧性的部分中介实现;仁慈领导调节作用不显著。结论:我国公务员工作投入和心理幸福感的关系受德行和威权领导影响,在高德行领导或低威权领导下的公务员更能通过工作投入促进心理幸福感,该影响需通过公务员心理韧性发挥作用。

Objective:The current study was conducted to the moderating effects of three different paternalistic leader-ship styles in the relationship between the work engagement and the psychological well-being in Chinese civil servants, and whether moderating effects were mediated by resilience. Methods:411 Chinese civil servants were investigated with the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale(UWES), Paternalistic Leadership Style Scale, Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale(CDRISC) and Ryff's Psychological Well-Being Scale. Results:After controlling for several demographic variables, ① the work engagement significantly and positively predicted the psychological well-being(γ=0.28, P<0.001); ②The moral leader-ship positively moderated the relationship between the work engagement and the psychological well-being(γ=0.08, P=0.029), and the resilience mediate the moderation completely. The authoritarian leadership had a negative moderation(γ=-0.17, P<0.001) which was partially mediated by the resilience. However, the moderation of the benevolent leadership was not significant. Conclusion:For Chinese civil servants, the relationship between the engagement and the psychological well-being is moderated by the moral or authoritarian leadership. The positive effect of work engagement on psychological well-being, which is mediated by resilience, will be stronger for those civil servants whose leaders possess high-level moral leadership or low-level authoritarian leadership.

基金项目:
作者简介:
参考文献:

1 马爽, 王晨曦, 胡婧, 等. 地税基层公务员工作压力与工作满意度、离职意向的关系:心理资本的调节作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2015, 23(2):326-329+335
2 张建人, 沈飘, 朱阿敏, 等. 社区工作人员工作价值观、工作满意度与工作绩效的关系. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2017, 25(1):178-181
3 张陆, 佐斌. 自我实现的幸福——心理幸福感研究述评. 心理科学进展, 2007, 15(1):134-139
4 胡少楠, 王咏. 工作投入的概念、测量、前因与后效. 心理科学进展, 2014, 12:1975-1984
5 Robertson IT, Jansen BA, Cooper CL. Job and work attitudes, engagement and employee performance:Where does psychological well-being fit in?. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 2012, 33(3):224-232
6 Matz-Costa C, Christina B, Elyssa J, et al. Differential impact of multiple levels of productive activity engagement on psychological well-being in middle and later life. The Gerontologist, 2014, 54(2):277-289
7 Chen CY, Chen CHV, Li CL. The Influence of Leader's Spiritual Values of Servant Leadership on Employee Motivational Autonomy and Eudaemonic Well-Being. Journal of Religion & Health, 2013, 52(2):418-438
8 Chughtai A, Byrne M, Flood B. Linking Ethical Leadership to Employee Well-Being:The Role of Trust in Supervisor. Journal of Business Ethics, 2015, 128(3):653-663
9 郑伯埙, 周丽芳, 樊景立. 家长式领导:三元模式的建构与测量. 本土心理学研究, 2000, 14:3-64
10 郑伯埙, 樊景立. 华人组织的家长式领导\一项文化观点的分析. 本土心理学研究, 2001, 13:127-180
11 Skakon J, Nielsen K, Borg V, et al. Are leaders'well-being behaviours and style associated with the affective well-being of employees? A systematic review of three decades of research. Work & Stress, 2010, 24(2):107-139
12 Bronfenbrenner U. Ecological systems theory. Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 1992
13 Mastern AS. Ordinary magic:Resilience process in development. American Psychologist, 2001, 56(3):227-238
14 Rutter M. Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1987, 57(3):316-331
15 刘玉兰. 西方抗逆力理论:转型, 演进, 争辩和发展. 国外社会科学, 2011, 6:68
16 Luthar SS, Cicchetti D, Becker B. The Construct of Resilience:A Critical Evaluation and Guidelines for Future Work. Child Development, 2000, 71(3):543-562
17 Doll B, Lyon MA. Risk and Resilience:Implications for the Delivery of Educational and Mental Health Services in Schools. School Psychology Review, 1998, 27(3):348-363
18 Polk LV. Toward a middle-range theory of resilience. Ans Advances in Nursing Science, 1997, 19(3):1-13
19 Rutter M. Resilience:Some conceptual considerations. Journal of Adolescent Health, 1993, 14(8):626-631
20 洪炜, 谢中垚, 周丽丽, 等. 心理弹性对基层公务员焦虑和抑郁的影响——有调节的中介模型. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2015, 23(5):795-798
21 Lightsey OR. Resilience, meaning, and well-being. The Counseling Psychologist, 2006, 34(1):96-107
22 Mak WW, NgIS, Wong CC. Resilience:enhancing wellbeing through the positive cognitive triad. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 2011, 58(4):610
23 胡夏娟. 大学生压力知觉, 复原力和心理幸福感的关系研究. 河北师范大学, 2009
24 万金, 时勘, 朱厚强, 等. 抗逆力对工作投入和工作幸福感的作用机制研究. 电子科技大学学报(社科版), 2016, 18 (1):33-39
25 张轶文, 甘怡群. 中文版 Utrecht 工作投入量表(UWES)的信效度检验. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2005, 13(3):268-270
26 于肖楠, 张建新. Connor-Davidson 韧性量表(CD-RISC) 在中国大陆的应用. 见:第十届全国心理学学术会议论文摘要集. 上海:华东师范大学, 2005
27 吴双磊. 大学生完美主义倾向及与心理幸福感的关系研究. 苏州大学, 2007
28 温忠麟, 张雷, 侯杰泰. 有中介的调节变量和有调节的中介变量. 心理学报, 2006, 38(3):448-452
29 郑伯埙, 周丽芳. 家长式领导三元模式:现代转化及其影响机制——威权领导:法家概念的现代转化. 见:行政院国家科学委员会专题研究计划成果报告. 报告编号 NSC94-2413-H-002-003-PAE, 台北:行政院国家科学委员会, 2005
30 Werner EE. Risk, resilience, and recovery:Perspectives from the Kauai Longitudinal Study. Development and Psychopathology, 1993, 5(4):503-515
31 邓蓉. 变革型领导对员工心理韧性及工作结果的影响研究. 华南理工大学, 2011
32 吴敏, 黄旭, 徐玖平, 等. 交易型领导、变革型领导与家长式领导行为的比较研究. 科研管理, 2007, 3:168-176

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【加入收藏
您是第访问者

《中国临床心理学杂志》编辑部
地址:湖南省长沙市中南大学湘雅二医院内, 410011
电 话:0731-85292472    电子邮件:cjcp_china@163.com
本系统由北京博渊星辰网络科技有限公司设计开发 技术支持电话:010-63361626