中国临床心理学杂志

不同情绪状态下心理距离对大学生道德判断的影响

作者：闫春平申鲁军杨世昌吕欣张亚茹

单位：1. 新乡医学院心理学系新乡 453003 2. 新乡医学院第二附属医院新乡 453002

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2017,25(2):251-254

摘要：

目的：探讨不同情绪状态、时间距离和社会距离对大学生道德判断的影响。方法：随机选取87名大学生被试，分成高兴、悲伤、愤怒和平静情绪组，让被试分别观看不同视频诱发相应情绪，然后回答有关道德判断的问题，这些问题分别涉及不同的时间距离（一年前、现在和一年后）和社会距离（自己和旁观者）。结果：有关医生困境道德判断的研究结果显示，情绪类型、时间距离和社会距离三者的交互作用显著。简单效应分析表明，悲伤的情绪状态下，被试从自己的角度分析问题时的道德决策水平在三个时间点均高于从旁观者的角度分析问题时的道德决策水平；被试以旁观者的角度分析道德问题时，平静状态的道德决策分数在三个时间点均高于悲伤状态下的道德决策分数；且一年前时间点上，平静状态的道德决策分数高于快乐状态下的道德决策分数，而愤怒状态的道德决策分数高于悲伤状态下的道德决策分数。对其它道德决策分数统计分析表明，情绪状态和社会距离之间及社会距离和时间距离之间的交互作用均显著，简单效应分析表明，在愤怒和平静的情绪状态下，被试从自己的角度分析道德两难问题时的道德决策水平低于从旁观者的角度去分析问题时的道德决策水平；被试从自己角度分析问题时，其一年后的道德决策水平高于一年前的道德决策水平。结论：情绪状态、社会距离和时间距离共同对个体的道德决策产生影响。

Objective: To explore the effects of emotional state, temporal distance and social distance on the moral judgment in college students. Methods: 87 college students participants, were divided into happy, sadness, anger and calm emotion groups for emotion induction by watching video, and then answer some questions about the moral judgment involving different temporal distances(a year ago, now or one year later) and social distances(their own vs bystander). Results: At doctor's dilemma situation, it showed a significant interactive effect between emotional state, temporal distance and social distance on the moral judgment. Simple effect analysis showed that, moral judgment score from their own angle was significantly higher than that from a standpoint of a bystander in the sadness state at three time points; Only from a standpoint of a bystander, the moral judgment score in calm was significantly higher than that in sadness at three time points; When a year ago, moral judgment score in calm was significantly higher than that in happy, and score in anger was significantly higher than that in sadness. For other situations concerning moral judgment, it showed significant interactive effects between emotional state and social distance, and between social distance and temporal distance, simple effect analysis showed that, tmoral judgment score from their own angle was significantly lower than that from a standpoint of a bystander in anger and calm state; Only from their own angle, moral judgment score one year later was significantly higher than that a year ago. Conclusion: Emotional state, temporal distance and social distance interacts to influence moral judgments.

基金项目：

河南省教育厅人文社会科学研究重点项目（2014-ZD-101）

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 Fataneh Z, Martin C, Stephanie M. The effects of happiness and Sadness on moral reasoning. Journal of Moral Education, 2000, 29(4):397-412
2 王云强, 郭本禹, 吴慧红. 情绪状态对大学生道德判断能力的影响. 心理科学, 2007, 30(6):1324-1327
3 吴永钦. 不同情绪状态对在校学生道德判断能力的影响. 华东师范大学硕士毕业论文, 2011
4 Eyal T, Liberman N, Trope Y. Judging near and distant virtue and vice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2008, 44(4):1204-1209
5 Barkan R, Ayal S, Gino F, Ariely D. The pot calling the kettle black:Distancing response to ethical dissonance. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 2012, 141(4):757-773
6 孙嘉卿, 顾璇, 吴嵩, 等. 道德伪善的心理机制:基于双加工理论的解读. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2012, 20(4):580-584
7 王珍. 解释水平对道德判断的影响. 河南大学硕士毕业论文, 2013
8 祝郁欣. 情绪易感性、关系自我及大学生道德判断的关系研究. 四川师范大学硕士学位论文, 2015
9 肖前国. 不同情绪与不同道德自我唤醒对高中生道德判断影响的调查研究. 广西教育学院学报, 2008(5):162-163
10 James J Gross, Robert W, Levenson. Emotion elicitation using films. Cognition & Emotion, 1995, 9(1):87-108
11 Bartek SE, Krebs DL, Taylor MC. Coping, defending, and the relations between moral judgment and moral behavior in prostitutes and other female juvenile delinquents. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1993, 102(102):66-73
12 Wark GR, Krebs DL. Gender and dilemma differences in real-life moral judgment. Developmental Psychology, 1996, 32(2):220-230
13 李桂娴. 情绪与事件类型对大学生道德判断影响的实证研究. 四川师范大学硕士毕业论文, 2014
14 Wark GR, Krebs DL. Sources of variation in moral judgment:Toward a model of real-life morality. Journal of Adult Development, 1997, 4(3):163-178
15 Wark GR, Krebs DL. The construction of moral dilemmas in everyday life. Journal of Moral Education, 2000, 29(1):5-21

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】