Objective: To develop the Middle School Student Perceived Teachers'Emotional Support Questionnaire (PTESQ) and test its validity and reliability. Methods: Through literatures review, interviews and open questionnaires form initial project. 450 middle school student were predicted and the questionnaire was revised according to the results of the prediction. 1200 middle school students were tested, and 1028 valid questionnaires were obtained, and 514 of which were assessed for exploratory factor analyses and 514 of which were assessed for confirmatory factor analyses. The Academic Self-efficacy Questionnaire (ASEQ), The Learning Burnout Questionnaire (LBQ), The Individual-oriented Achievement Motive Scale (inner motivation) (IOAMS) were used to test its criterion validity. The test-retest reliability was tested in 63 middle school student 4 weeks later. Results: The questionnaire consisted of 18 items, including 4 dimensions:care about students, understanding students, respect students, encourage students, explaining the total variance 68.52%. The results of CFA showed that the questionnaire fitted the data with well construct validity (χ2/df=3.36, GFI=0.91, NFI=0.91, CFI=0.93, TLI=0.93, IFI=0.92, RMSEA=0.07). The PTESQ and its dimensions scores were positively correlated with the ASEQ scores (r=0.31-0.42, Ps<0.01) and IOAMS scores (r=0.29-0.36, Ps<0.01), while negatively correlated with the LBQ scores (r=-0.36-0.44, Ps<0.01). The Cronbach's α coefficient of the total questionnaire was 0.93, and 0.82-0.86 for the 4 dimensions. The test-retest reliability of the total questionnaire was 0.86, and 0.65-0.73 for the 4 dimensions. Conclusion: The Middle School Student Perceived Teachers'Emotional Support Questionnaire has satisfactory validity and reliability, and meets the needs of psychometrics, which can be used in both research and practice.
|
1 Vosburg F. The use of emotional support in dentistry. Journal of the Canadian Dental Association,1972, 38(11):417-418
2 Wehlage G, Rutter M, Smith G, et al. Reducing the risk:Schools as communities of support. London:Falmer Press, 1989
3 Rachel Y, Bonnie L. Adults make a difference:The protective effects of parent and teacher emotional support on emotional and behavioral problems of peer-victimized adolescents. Journal of Community Psychology, 2010, 10(2):80-98
4 贾娟. 教师情感支持及其对中学生自尊和学业自我效能感的影响研究. 重庆:西南大学,2012
5 胥兴春,杨聃旎,贾娟. 中学生感知的教师情感支持问卷编制及特点研究. 西南大学学报(自然科学版),2014,36(6):175-179
6 Crosnoe R, Johnson MK, Elder GH. Intergenerational bonding in school:The behavioral and contextual correlates of student-teacher relationships. Sociology of Education, 2004, 77(1):60-81
7 Becker BE, Luthar SS. Peer-perceived admiration and social preference:Contextual correlates of positive peer regard among suburban and urban adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 2007, 17(1):117-144
8 Colarossi LG, Eccles JS. Differential effects of support providers on adolescents'mental health. Social Work Research, 2003, 27(1):19-30
9 Barber BK, Olsen JA. Assessing the transitions to middle and high school. Journal of Adolescent Research, 2004, 19(1):3-30
10 张惠珍,姜东霞. 论研究生自主学习中教师的引导作用和情感支持. 山西财经大学学报,2009,31(2):236-238
11 陈文梅. 浅析开放教育环境下辅导教师的情感支持对学生学习的促进作用. 吉林广播电视大学学报,2012,6:47-48
12 岳泉汐,路海东. 高中生感知到的教师情感支持的干预研究. 教育测量与评价,2014,6:47-51
13 陈彦垒,郭少阳. 初中生感知教师支持行为对学业成就的影响:有中介的调节效应. 中国临床心理学杂志,2016,24(2):332-337
14 孙仕秀,关影红,覃滟云,等. 青少年社会支持与情绪行为问题的关系:心理弹性的中介与调节作用. 中国临床心理学杂志,2013,21(1):114-118
15 刘霞,赵景欣,申继亮,等. 初中留守儿童社会支持状况的调查. 中国临床心理学杂志,2007,15(2):183-185
16 Christine KM, Michelle KD. Measuring perceived social support:Development of the child and adolescent social support scale. Psychology in the Schools, 2002, 39(1):1-18
17 Patrick H, Turner JC, Meyer DK, et al. How teachers establish psychological environments during the first days of school:Associations with avoidance in mathematics. Teach ers College Record, 2003, 105(8):1521-1558
18 梁宇颂. 大学生成就目标、归因方式与学业自我效能感的关系. 武汉:华中师范大学,2000
19 胡俏,戴春林. 中学生学习倦怠结构研究. 心理科学,2007,30(1):162-164
20 余安邦,杨国枢. 社会取向成就动机与个我取向成就动机:概念分析与实证研究. 中央研究院民族与研究所集刊,1989,64:51-98
|