中国临床心理学杂志

认知负荷对个人理论影响刻板印象相关信息加工的调节作用

作者：余秋梅

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2015,23(4):630-634

摘要：

目的:探讨不同认知负荷条件下个人理论对刻板印象相关信息加工的影响。方法:采用内隐个人理论测验作为筛选实验被试的工具,以再认准确性为指标来考察认知负荷对个人理论影响刻板印象相关信息加工的调节作用。结果:在高认知负荷条件下,实体论被试把更多的注意分配给与特质一致信息,而动态论被试则将更多的注意分配给与特质不一致信息;在低认知负荷条件下,两类被试对四类信息的注意分配无显著差异;在无认知负荷条件下,实体论被试在特质维度上的不一致性效应显著高于从属维度,而动态论被试在特质维度上的一致性效应显著高于从属维度。结论:个人对刻板印象相关信息的加工方式不仅受其个人理论的调节,而且与认知资源的充足度有关。

Objective: To explore the moderating role of personal theory on stereotype information processing under dif-ferent cognitive loads. Methods: The Implicit Person Theory Measure was taken to choose subjects, and the recognition sen-sitivity measures was used to tap the degree of information. Results: Under high cognitive load, entity theorists allocated more attention to trait-consistent information, and incremental theorists allocated more attention to trait-inconsistent infor-mation; under no cognitive load, entity theorists allocated more attention to trait-inconsistent information, and incremental theorists allocated more attention to trait-consistent information; under low cognitive load, there were no significant differ-ences to four types of information in both entity theorists and incremental theorists. Conclusion: The processing method of stereotype information was moderated by both personal theory and the cognitive resource.

基金项目：

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 Hamilton DL, Sherman SJ. Perceiving persons and groups. Psychological Review, 1996, 103(2): 336-355
2 Tajfel H, Turner JC. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior In S. Worchel W. Austin(Eds.), The psychology of inter-group relations. Chicago: Nelson-Hall, 1986, 2 (1): 7-24
3 闫秀梅,王美芳. 性别刻板印象对有意图特质推理的影响:性别图式的调节作用. 中国临床心理学杂志,2013,21 (5):739-742
4 Bodenhausen GV. Stereotypic biases in social decision making and memory: Testing process models of stereotype use. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1988, 55(4):726-737
5 Macrae CN, Milne AB, Bodenhausen GV. Stereotypes as energy-saving devices: A peek inside the cognitive toolbox. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1994, 66(1):37-47
6 Weber R, Crocker J. Cognitive processes in the revision of stereotypic beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1983, 45(5): 961-977
7 Devine PG, Baker S. Measurement of racial stereotype subtyping. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1991, 17 (1): 44-50
8 Lui L, Brewer MW. Recognition accuracy as evidence of category-consistency effects in person memory. Social Cognition,1983, 2(1): 89-107
9 Maass A, Salvi D, Arcuri L. Semin GR. Language use in intergroup contexts: The linguistic intergroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1989, 57(5): 981-993
10 Sherman JW, Lee AY, Bessenoff GR, Frost LA. Stereotype efficiency reconsidered: Encoding flexibility under cognitive load. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998, 75 (3): 589-606
11 Eagly AH, Chen S, Chaiken S, Shaw-Barnes K. The impact of attitudes on memory: An affair to remember. Psychological Bulletin, 1999, 125(1): 65-89
12 Eagly AH, Kulesa P, Chen S, Chaiken S. Why counterattitudinal messages are as memorable as pro-attitudinal messages: The importance of active defense against attack. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2000, 26(7):1392-1408
13 Bonanno GA, Davis PJ, Singer J.L Schwartz GE. The repressor personality and avoidant information processing: A dichotic listening study. Journal of Research in Personality,1991, 25(2): 386-401
14 MacLeod C, Matthews A, Tata P. Attentional bias in emotional disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1986, 95 (1): 15-20
15 Newman LS, McKinney LC. Repressive coping and threat avoidance: An idiographic Stroop study. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2002, 28(2): 409-422
16 Ditto PH, Scepansky JA, Munro GD, et al. Motivated sensitivity to preference-inconsistent information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998, 75(1): 53-69
17 Macrae CN, Bodenhausen GV, Schloerscheidt AM, et al. Tales of the unexpected: Executive function and person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1999,76(1): 200-213
18 Sherman JW, Frost LA. On the encoding of stereotyperelevant information under cognitive load. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2000, 34(1): 26-34
19 Plaks JE. StroessnerSJ, Dweck CS, et al. Person theories and attention allocation: Preferences for stereotypic versus counter-stereotypic information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2001, 80(6): 876-893
20 Plaks JE, Grant H, Dweck CS. Violations of implicit theories and the sense of prediction and control: Implications for motivated person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2005, 88(2): 254-262
21 余秋梅,张锋. 个人理论对刻板印象相关行为信息注意加工的调节作用. 中国临床心理学杂志,2014,22(6):964-969
22 余秋梅,李里,周波,等. 个人理论和刻板印象对性别行为信息注意加工的相对作用. 中国临床心理学杂志,2015,23(3):421-425
23 Macmillan NA. Creelman CD. Detection theory: A user's guide. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991
24 Förster J, Higgins ET Strack F. When stereotype disconfirmation is a personal threat: How prejudice and prevention focus moderate in-congruency effects. Social Cognition,2000, 18(1): 178-197

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】