中国临床心理学杂志

多项能力倾向测验(MAT)的效度研究

作者：王进礼¹ 2 龚耀先¹ 罗贵友³ 刘华强²

单位：1. 中南大学湘雅二医院心理研究中心湖南长沙 410011
2. 武警医学院天津 300162
3. 武警湖南总队医院

关键词：能力倾向测验效度武警部队

分类号：G449.5

出版年,卷(期):页码：2004,12(4):335-339

摘要：

目的：对多项能力倾向测验(MAT)进行效度研究。方法：研究结构效度(探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析等)和实证效度(以不同的职业群体区分，训练成绩、领导评定和韦氏成人智力测验作效标)。结果：结构效度：各分量表分与总分相关较高(0.69～0.80)，动作稳定分量表与总分相关较低(0.2 9)。探索性因素分析抽取了特征值大于1的四个因子；验证性因素分析的拟合指数CFI、NNFI均在0.95以上。实证效度：MAT分数在不同职业群体之间、在不同学历群体之间差异显著(P <；0.01或P <；0.05) ；MAT分数与三项训练成绩总分显著相关；MAT总分与领导评定总分显著相关；MAT分数与韦氏成人智力测验简式总分及相应分测验显著相关。结论：MAT具有合理的结构效度和实证效度。

Objective:To evaluate the validity of The Multidimensional Aptitude Test(MAT).Methods:Validity included construct-related validity and criterion-related validity.The construct-related validity was examined by exploratory factor analysis(EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis(CFA).The criterion-related validity was obtained by group differentiation,training scores,leader’s rating,and WAIS respectively.Results:There were higher correlations between the total score and three sub-scales:abstract thinking ,spatial ability,attention and speed(0.68～0.80),while lower correlations between the total score and motor stability subscale(0.29).Four main factors was obtained by EFA,accounting for 54.28%of whole variance.Fit indexes of CFI and NNFI were over 0.95,RMSEA below 0.05 ,and CMIN PDF below 2.Significant differences were found among jobs and educational levels(P<0.01 or P<0.05).Significant correlations were obtained between MAT and exam scores,leader’s rating,and WAIS respectively.Conclusion: The construct-related validity is reasonable,and theoretic model provides a good fit to the data and the criterion-related validity is supported by the examinations.

基金项目：

作者简介：

参考文献：

[1] 王进礼,龚耀先.多项能力倾向测验的初步编制.中国临床心理学杂志,2004,12(2):116-120
[2] 龚耀先,等.长-鞍团体智力测验手册,长沙:湖南医科大学.1997
[3] 龚耀先,林传鼎,张厚粲,等.中国修订韦氏智力量表简式手册,湖南医学院,1986
[4] Burt C. The structure of the mind:a review of the results of factor analysis. British Journal of Educational psychology,1949,19:110-111
[5] Vernon PE. The Structure of Human Ability(rev.ed). London: Methuen.1960
[6] Carretta TR,Ree MJ. Factor structure of the air force officer qualifying test: analysis and comparison. Military Psychology. 1996,8:29-42
[7] Carretta TR, retzlaff PD, callister JD,et al. A comparison of tow U.S. Air Force pilot aptitude tests. Avation, space, Environment Medicine,1998, 69:931-935
[8] 孟庆茂,侯杰泰. 协方差结构模型与多层线性模型原理及应用. 北京师范大学心理计量与统计分析教研室,2001
[9] 洪炜,龚耀先.一般行政能力倾向测验的建构及信度、效度研究.中国临床心理学杂志,2000,8(1):1-6
[10] Murphy KR,Davidshofer CD. Psychological Testing. Prentice-Hall,Inc, 1994
[11] 郑日昌.心理测量.湖南教育出版社.1985.126
[12] 陈明终,许胜哲,吴清山.我国心理教育测验汇编.高雄复文书局,1988
[13] 吴天敏.提高智慧的再次研究.心理学报,1985,4
[14] 吴福元.大学生的智力发展与智力结构.教育研究,1983,4
[15] R.L 桑代克,E. P. 哈根.心理与教育的测量和评价.北京:人民教育出版社,1985.65-88
[16] (美)安尼.安娜斯塔西,苏珊娜.厄比纳著,缪小春,竺培梁译. 心理测验,浙江教育出版社,2001.154-164
[17] Atkinson JW, Malley AO.Motivation and ability:Interactive psychological determinants of intellective performance, educational achievement, and each other.Orlando,FL:Academic Press. 1997.29-60
[18] Robbins TL, Denisi AS. A closer look at interpersonal affect as a distinct influence on cognitive processing in performance appraisal.J Applied psychology,1994,79(3):341-353

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】