中国临床心理学杂志

社会能力评定量表的编制及信效度检验

作者：刘子龙¹ 高北陵² 袁尚贤¹

单位：1 华中科技大学同济医学院法医学系湖北武汉 430030
2 深圳市精神卫生研究所广东深圳 518020

关键词：社会能力评定量表信度效度

分类号：G449.5

出版年,卷(期):页码：2005,13(1):19-22

摘要：

目的:编制社会能力评定量表并检测其信度和效度。方法:在全国五大行政区用社会能力评定量表评估1605例正常人(男性814名,女性791名),分析量表的信效度。结果:全量表的Cronbach'sα系数为0.88～0.92,三个分量表的α系数为0.81～0.88;量表的分半信度为0.76～0.87,量表的重测信度为0.67～0.86,量表评分者信度为0.91～0.97,表明量表具有较好的内部一致性和稳定性;各条目与总分的相关系数0.49～0.80,分量表与总分的相关系数为0.76～0.89,通过因子分析,证实了量表的结构效度;全量表总分和职业能力得分与被试单位提供的实际社会能力评分呈高度相关,与韦氏智商呈中低度相关。结论:量表编制符合心理测量学要求,具有良好的信度和效度。

Objective:To develop a Rating Scale of Social Ability (RSSA) and to test its reliability and validity.Methods: The reliability and validity of RSSA were examined the basis of on 1605 normal subjects (814 males and 791 females) from 5 districts of China.Results: The Cronbach's α coefficients of RSSA were 0.88~0.92, the split-half reliability were 0.79~0.89, the test-retest reliability ranged from 0.67~0.86, and the scorer reliability were 0.91~0.97. The correlations between item scores and the total scores ranged from 0.49 to 0.80, and the correlations between the factor scores and composites were 0.76~0.89. The construct validity was supported by factor analysis. Acceptable internal consistency was obtained for total and dimensional scores. Significant correlation was found between the total scores of RSSA and the scores of practice ability, and medium correlation with IQ of WAIS-RC.Conclusion: RSSA has acceptable psychometrics properties on reliability and validity.

基金项目：

国家教育部留学回国人员科研启动基金资助项目(教外司留2001-345);广东省自然科学基金重点项目(021972);广东省医学科研基金资助项目(A20011632)

作者简介：

参考文献：

[1] 刘子龙,高北陵.精神医学鉴定中社会能力评定的意义与方法.中国临床心理学杂志,2004,12(3):318-320
[2] 谢宝珍,金盛华.实践智力、社会智力、情绪智力的概念及其教育价值.心理学探新,2001,2:21-25
[3] Sternberg RJ. People's conceptions of intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1981, 41:37-55
[4] 高北陵.精神医学鉴定中颅脑损伤患者伤前智力评定的意义及方法.中华精神科杂志,2001,34(1):52-54
[5] 高北陵,刘仁刚,李映平,等.必选数字记忆测验对伪装记忆损伤的鉴别作用.中国临床心理学杂志,2001,9(4):244-247
[6] 张文彤主编.SPSS11.0统计分析教程(高级篇).北京.北京希望电子出版社,2001.190-233

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】