|
目的:探讨大学生互联网相关社会-心理健康的概念结构,建立互联网相关社会-心理健康量表。方法:分别对511名和581名被试基于互联网相关社会-心理健康问卷的数据进行探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析。结果:①互联网相关社会-心理健康由孤独感、社会参与度、一般抑郁、生活幸福感和生活满意度五个初级因素构成,并可概括为社会健康和心理健康两个高阶因素。ISHS-CS具有较理想的项目区分度,内部一致性信度、构想效度和区分效度。②互联网使用者的社会-心理健康与使用时间无显著关联,但与上网次数有一定关系。③基于信息获取性动机而使用互联网,其社会-心理健康水平较高,而基于人际情感性动机而使用互联网,其社会-心理健康水平较低。结论:大学生互联网相关社会-心理健康概念的构想合理,其量表可以作为大学生互联网相关社会-心理健康水平的评定工具。
|
|
Objective:To explore the structure of concept of the Internet-related social-psychological health for undergraduates and develop The Internet-related Social-psychological Health Scale for Undergraduates (ISHS-CS).Methods: Employing exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis of the data of ISHS-CS.based on 2 samples of 511 and 581 of undergraduates respectively.Results: ① The structure of Internet-related social-psychological health for undergraduates consisted of 5 primary factors, viz. loneliness, social involvement, general depression, life happiness and life satisfaction. These five factors could be generalized into 2 higher-order dimensions, namely social health and psychological health. The ISHS-CS had satisfactory item validity, internal consistent reliability, construct validity and criterion-related validity. ② Relation of time of Internet use to Internet-related social-psychological health was unremarkable, but, some relation between frequency of internet use and social-psychological health was found. ③ Compared with the undergraduates based on Social-affective motive of Internet-use, those based on Information-acquisition motive possessed higher level of Internet-related social-psychological health.Conclusion: The concept of Internet-related social-psychological health was a reasonable construct for undergraduates, and the ISHS-CS could serve as a measurement of Internet-related social-psychological health for undergraduates.
|
|
[1] Attewell P, Rule J. Computing and organizations. What we know and what we don't know. Conmunication of the ACM, 1984, 27(12):1184-1192
[2] Anderson RH,et al. Universal Access to E-mail:Feasibility and Societal Implications. Santa Monica,CA: Rand Corporation, 1995
[3] King JL, Kraemer KL. Information infrastructure, national policy, and global competitiveness. Information Infrastructure and Policy, 1995, 4(1): 5-28
[4] Kraut R, Patterson M, Lundmark V, et al. Internet paradox: a social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 1998, 53(9): 1017-1031
[5] LaRose R, Eastin MS, Gregg J. Reformulating theInternet paradox: Social cognitive explanations of Internet use and depression. Journal of Online Behavior, 2001, 1(2):http://www.behavior. net/JOB/v1n1/paradox.html
[6] Shaw LH, Gant LM. In defense of the Internet: Therelationship between Internet communication and depression, loneliness, self-esteem, and perceived social support. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 2002, 5(2):157-171
[7] Weiser EB. The function of Internet use and their social and psychological consequences. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 2001, 4(6): 723-743
[8] 沈模卫,李鹏,徐梅,等.大学生病理性互联网使用行为模式研究.华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),2004,(4)
[9] 徐梅,张锋,朱海燕.大学生互联网使用动机模式及其相关因素的研究.应用心理学,2004,10(3):8-11
[10] Deiner E, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ. The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1985,49(1): 71-75
[11] 汪向东,王希林,马弘.心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版).中国心理卫生杂志社,1999:284-287;200-202
[12] Morahan-Martin J, Schumacher P. Incidence and correlates of pathological internet use among college students. Computers and Human Behavior, 2000, 16(1):
[13] Davis RA, Flett GL, Besser A. Validation of a new scale for measuring problematic internet use: implications for pre -employment screening. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 2002, 5(4): 331-345
[14] 刘加艳.大学生孤独感与网络使用特点关系的研究.中国临床心理学杂志,2004,12(3):286-297
|