中国临床心理学杂志

罗夏测验攻击变量与外显攻击敌意的关系

作者：阎燕燕¹ 孟宪璋²

单位：1. 郑州大学西亚斯国际学院基础系河南郑州 451150
2. 暨南大学附属第一医院心理科广东广州 510632

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2007,15(6):569-571

摘要：

目的：探索国内提出的罗夏测验攻击变量与外显的攻击敌意行为的关系。方法：按照CCMD-3标准选择30名病人施测罗夏测验，做简明精神病量表的评定。结果：①攻击变量的克伦巴赫α系数均在0.78以上；②因素分析将攻击变量归纳为3个因子:攻击行为(28.91)、攻击主体(23.95)、被攻击的结果(23.11)，总方差贡献率为76%；③攻击变量中:攻击性内容、潜在的攻击、攻击性情绪、心理伤害和攻击变量总分与简明精神病量表的敌对猜疑因子显著相关，攻击性内容和攻击变量总分在敌对猜疑因子的高低分组上差异显著。结论：部分支持使用罗夏测验攻击变量测量攻击，但还需要进一步研究完善。

Objective: To explore the correlation between Rorschach aggression variables and BPRS hostility factor.Methods: According to CCMD-3 standard, a clinical sample of 30 inpatient and outpatient subjects with a diagnosis of multiple mental disorder were administered Rorschach Inkblot Method and Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. The concept ualnature and clinical utility of the Rorschach aggression variables as well as the correlation between Rorschach aggression variables and BPRS hostility factor was discussed. Results: This study indicated that: ①12 Rorschach aggression variables had good Cronbach α reliability coefficient (all above 0.77); ②3 factors, revealed by factor analysis, accounted for 76% of the total variance; ③Selected variables were found to be empirically related to a doctor-rating measure of BPRS hostility factor. Independent-sample T Test indicated variable AgC and total aggression score meant significant difference between the high group and low group of BPRS hostility factor. Conclusion: These findings partly support the use of the Rorschach variables in the assessment of certain aggression as well as contributing to a better conceptual understanding of aggression.

基金项目：

作者简介：

参考文献：

[1] Gacono CB,Meloy JR.The Rorschach assessment of aggre ssive and psychopathic personalities.Hillsdale,NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,Inc,1994.259-278
[2] Baity MR,Hilsenroth MJ.Rorschach aggression variables:A study of reliability and validity.Journal of Personality Assessment,1999,72 (1):93-110
[3] Baity MR,Hilsenroth MJ.Rorschach aggressive content (AgC) variable:A study of criterion validity.Journal of Personality Assessment,2002,78(2):275-282
[4] Joni LM,Elizabeth Nathan-Montano,Rebeca JA.Rorschach Measures of Aggressive Drive Derivatives:A College Student Sample.Journal of Personality Assessment,2003,80(1):41-49
[5] 刘国华,孟宪璋.近十年国外罗夏测验攻击变量研究综述.应用心理学,2003,9(3):62-64,51
[6] 刘秀菊,孟宪璋.罗夏测验攻击变量的研究.中国临床心理学杂志,2006,14(1):22-24
[7] 刘国华,孟宪璋.罗夏测验攻击变量的信度效度研究.中国临床心理学杂志,2007,15(1):13-14,17
[8] 阎燕燕,孟宪璋.罗夏测验攻击变量的信效度及与BPRS敌对猜疑因子的相关性.中国心理卫生杂志,2007,21(5):345
[9] 龚耀先,等.洛夏测验手册.湖南医科大学,1991
[10] 何燕玲.简明精神病量表.见:汪向东,王希林,马弘,等.心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版).中国心理卫生杂志社,1999.263-267
[11] 赫尔曼·罗夏著.心理诊断法.袁军译.杭州:浙江教育出版社,1997.4

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】