设为首页 | 加入收藏
网站首页 本刊简介 编委会 投稿指南 过刊浏览 广告合作 网上订购 下载专区 联系我们  
Nolen-Hoeksema反刍思维量表在中国的试用
作者:韩秀  杨宏飞 
单位:浙江大学心理与行为科学系  浙江 杭州 310028 
关键词:RRS 反刍思维 信度 效度 性别差异 
分类号:B844.2
出版年,卷(期):页码:2009,17(5):550-551
摘要:

目的:探索Nolen-Hoeksema反刍思维量表(RRS)的信效度及其在中国的适用情况。方法:采用反刍思维量表、抑郁、焦虑、自尊、神经质、生活满意度量表,对912名大学本科生施测。结果:验证性因素分析结果χ2=2610.43(df=231)、RMSEA=0.068、GFI=0.87、AGFI=0.86、NNFI=0.82、CFI=0.83、IFI=0.83,各项指标表明原量表模型是可以接受的。RRS总量表α系数0.90,重测信度0.82,各因子α系数在0.68-0.85间,重测信度在0.63-0.80间。在抑郁症状反刍、强迫思考和总量表得分上性别差异显著,女性更倾向于反刍思维。结论:RRS中文版适合在中国本科生中使用。

Objective:To explore the reliability and validity of Ruminative Responses Scale in Chinese version.Methods:A total of 912 Chinese college students completed the RRS.Results:All the indexes of confirmatory analysis including χ2、RMSEA、GFI、AGFI、NNFI、CFI、IFI met the requirements of psychological assessment. The α coefficients of the scale and subscales and test-retest reliabilities were over 0.63. There was gender difference in rumination level.Conclusion:RRS is appropriate for the assessment of rumination in Chinese colleges.

基金项目:
作者简介:
参考文献:

[1] Nolen-Hoeksema S,Morrow J.A prospective study of depression and posttraumatic stress symptoms after a natural disaster:The Loma Prieta earthquake.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1991,61(1):115-121
[2] Roberts JE,Gilboa E,Gotlib IH.Ruminative response styles and vulnerability to episodes of dysphoria:Gender,neur oticism,and episode duration.Cognitive Therapy and Research,1998,22(4):401-423
[3] Bagby RM,Parker JA.Relation of rumination and distraction with neuroticism and extraversion in a sample of patients with major depression.Cognitive Therapy and Research,2001,25(1):91-102
[4] Treynor W,Gonzalez R,Nolen-Hoeksema S.Rumination reconsidered:A psychometric analysis.Cognitive Therapy and Research,2003,27(3):247-259
[5] 杨娟,凌宇,肖晶,等.沉思反应量表中文版在高中生中初步运用结果分析.中国临床心理学杂志,2009,17(1):27-31
[6] Nolen-Hoeksema S,Davis CG.“Thanks for sharing that”:Ruminators and their social support networks.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1999,77(4):801-814
[7] Just N,Alloy LB.The response styles theory of depression:Tests and an extension of the theory.Journal of Abnormal Psychology,1997,106(2):221-229
[8] Butler LD,Nolen-Hoeksema S.Gender differences in response to depressed mood in a college sample.Sex Roles,1994,30(5):331-346
[9] 陈昌惠.症状自评量表(Symptom Checklist 90,SCL-90).见:汪向东,王希林,马弘,等编著.心理卫生评定量表手册.增刊.中国心理卫生杂志,1999.31-35
[10] 季益富,于欣.自尊量表(The self-esteem scale,SES).见:汪向东,王希林,马弘,等编著.心理卫生评定量表手册.增刊.中国心理卫生杂志,1999.318-320
[11] Goldberg LR.A broad-bandwidth,public domain,person ality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models.In:Mervielde I,Deary I,De Fruyt F,Eds.Personality Psychology in Europel Tilburg,The Nether-lands:Tilburg University Press,1999,7:7-28
[12] Diener E,Emmons RA,Larsen RJ,et al.The satisfaction of life scale.J Pers Assess,1985,9:71-75

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【加入收藏
您是第访问者

《中国临床心理学杂志》编辑部
地址:湖南省长沙市中南大学湘雅二医院内, 410011
电 话:0731-85292472    电子邮件:cjcp_china@163.com
本系统由北京博渊星辰网络科技有限公司设计开发 技术支持电话:010-63361626