中国临床心理学杂志

军人述情障碍量表的研制

作者：徐莲莲¹ 张理义²

单位：1. 江苏大学临床医学院江苏镇江 212013
2. 解放军第102医院江苏常州 213003

关键词：军人述情障碍信度效度

分类号：R82

出版年,卷(期):页码：2009,17(5):532-534

摘要：

目的：编制军人述情障碍量表并对其进行信效度检验。方法：随机整群抽取901名军人进行测试，按取样单位分为两个样本，分别进行探索性因子分析和验证性因子分析；抽取其中63名被试，同时施测艾森克人格问卷(成人版)(EPQ)、多伦多述情障碍量表(TAS-20)、中国军人心理健康量表(CMMHS)，并于2周后对其中47名被试进行本量表的重测。结果：军人述情障碍量表由五个因子构成：情感表达障碍、情感体验缺失、躯体化倾向、外向性思维和情感应对，经因子分析修正获得25个条目的正式量表，另加一个掩饰分量表。总量表及各分量表的一致性信度和分半信度均在0.6以上，2周重测相关系数为0.507～0.791(P<0.01)。结论：军人述情障碍量表具有较好的信度和效度。

Objective:To develop a Military Alexithymia Scale (MAS) and examine its reliability and validity.Methods:The data was collected from 901 subjects chosen by random cluster sampling, and then the subjects were split into two samples for exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). 63 of them were tested with Toronto Alexithymia Scale(TAS-20), Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ) and Chinese Military Mental Health Scale (CMMHS) at the same time, while 47 of them were retested with the MAS after two weeks.Results:The structure of the Alexithymia for military personnel consisted of five factors:difficult feeling expression, absent feeling experience, somatic tendency, externally-oriented thinking and altered feeling coping. 25 items were extracted according to the factor analysis results and one lie subscale was added. The MAS were significantly correlated with most factors of TAS-20, EPQ and CMMHS. The Cronbach'sα coefficients and split-half reliability of MAS were both higher than 0.64 and the test-retest reliability ranged from 0.507～0.791(P<0.01).Conclusion:The MAS has acceptable reliability and validity.

基金项目：

作者简介：

参考文献：

[1] Sifneos PE.The prevalence of alexithymic characteristics in psychosomatic patients.Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics,1973,22:255-262
[2] Bagby RM,Taylor GJ,Quilty LC.Reexamining the factor structure of the 20-item toronto alexithymia scale:Commentary on gignac,palmer,and stough.Journal of Personality Assessment,1989,3:258-264
[3] Bagby RM,Parker JDA,Taylor GJ.The twenty-item toronto alexithymia scale II.Convergent discriminnant,and concurrent validity.Journal of Psycosomatic Research,1994,38(1):23-32
[4] Parker JDA,Taylor GJ,Bagby RM.The 20-item toronto alexithymia scale Ⅲ.Reliability and factorial validity in a community population.Journal of Psychosomatic Research,2003,55:269-275
[5] Kirmayer LJ.Languages of suffering and healing:Alexithymia as a social and cluture processs.Transcultural Psychiatric Research Review,1987,24:119-136
[6] 谢宝国,龙立荣,赵一君.职业高原问卷的编制及信效度研究.中国临床心理学杂志,2008,16(4):344-347
[7] 龚耀先.艾森克人格问卷(EPQ)修订手册.长沙:湖南教育出版社,1989.1-45
[8] 张理义.临床心理学.北京:人民军医出版社,2004.381-384
[9] Streiner DL.Figuring out factors:The use and misuse of factor analysis.Can J Psychiatry,1994,39(3):135-140
[10] 姚芳传.述情障碍.国外医学:精神病学分册,1991,l8(2):141-144
[11] Taylor GJ,Bagby RM.New trends in alexithymia research.Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics,2004,73(2):68-77
[12] 黄芳铭.结构方程模式:理论与应用.北京:中国税务出版社,2005.272-290

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】