中国临床心理学杂志

家庭教养方式问卷的编制和信效度研究

单位：1. 无锡市精神卫生中心江苏无锡 214151
2. 江南大学江苏无锡 214122
3. 无锡市未成年人成长指导中心

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2011,19(6):711-714

摘要：

目的:编制本土化家庭教养方式问卷并验证其信度和效度。方法:根据中国文化背景结合国内外家庭教养方式研究文献,编制了包含20种教养行为的家庭教养方式问卷;在3976名基本样本(年龄范围9~26岁)、140名重测样本和158名效度样本中进行测试。结果:问卷的重测信度、分半信度和α系数分别为0.654~0.822、0.635~0.869和0.496~0.824(P<0.001);条目与维度分有显著相关(r=0.26~0.73),维度间有较高的相关(0.32~0.81);因素分析获得3个因子,解释方差68%,各维度分与SCL-90多数因子分显著负相关(r=0.20~0.50)。结论:新编家庭教养方式问卷的重测信度、同质信度、结构效度和实证效度均较理想,符合心理测量学的要求。

Objective:To develop Family Upbringing Style Questionaire (FUSQ)and examine it's reliability and validity.Methods:A self-report family upbringing style questionaire containing 20 parenting behaviors was developed onbase of Chinese cultural background and research literature.The test-retest reliability,internal consistency reliability,construct validity,and empirical validity were examined in the general sample of 3976 subjects,retest sample of 140subjects,and validity sample of 158 subjects,aged from 9 to 26 years.Results:The stability coefficients,split-halfreliability,Cronbach's α coefficients were 0.654~0.822、0.635 ~0.869 和0.496 ~0.824 (P<0.001)respectively for 10dimensions;The Item score was significantly correlated with dimensional scores.The correlations between dimensionsranged from 0.26~0.73;Factor analysis extracted 3 factors and accountered for 68% of variance,The dimensional scoreswere significantly correlated with most factor scores on the SCL-90.Conclusion:The stability,internal consistency,andvalidity of the FUSQ are good and meet with psychometric standard.

基金项目：

作者简介：

参考文献：

[1] Perris C,Jacobsson L,Lindstrm H,et al.Development of anew inventory for assessing memories of parental rearingbehaviour.Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica,1980,61(2):265-274.
[2] 岳冬梅,李鸣皋,金魁和,等.父母教养方式:EMBU 的初步修订及其在神经症患者的应用.中国心理卫生杂志,1993,7(3):97-101.
[3] 李彦章,许东民.父母教养方式问卷的编制.第三军医大学学报,2001,23(12):1494-1495.
[4] Chao RK.Beyond parental control and authoritarian parentingstyle:Understanding Chinese parenting through the culturalnotion of training.Child Development,1994,65(4):1111-1119.
[5] Parker G,Tupling H,Brown LB.A parental bonding instrument.British Journal of Medical Psychology,1979,52(1):1-10.
[6] 杨红君,楚艳民,刘利,等.父母养育方式量表（PBI）在中国大学生中的初步修订.中国临床心理学杂志,2009,17(4):434-436.
[7] Keller H,Lohaus A,Kuensemueller P,et al.The bio-cultureof parenting:Evidence from five cultural communities.arenting:Science and Practice,2004,4(1):25-50.
[8] 赵汗青.家庭教养方式研究的发展进程.商丘师范学院学报,2006,22(6):160-162.
[9] 王晓阳.国外关于不同阶层家庭教养方式的研究.北京师范大学学报（社会科学版）,1993,5:89-95.
[10] 高明,周世杰.父母养育方式量表（PBI）在高职院校学生中的应用.中国临床心理学杂志,2011,19(2):198-199.
[11] 陈哲,付丽,彭咏梅,等.父母教养方式、儿童期虐待、依恋与反社会人格障碍倾向的关系.中国临床心理学杂志,2011,19(2):212-214.
[12] Shek DTL.Perceived parental control processes,parent -child relational qualities,and psychological well-being inChinese adolescents with and without economic disadvantage.The Journal of Genetic Psychology,2005,166(2):171-188.

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】