设为首页 | 加入收藏
网站首页 本刊简介 编委会 投稿指南 过刊浏览 广告合作 网上订购 下载专区 联系我们  
士兵内隐集体自尊的ERP研究
作者:王伟宇  钟毅平 
单位:湖南师范大学教育科学学院  湖南长沙 410081 
关键词:内隐集体自尊 集体自我概念 事件相关电位(ERP) Go/No-go联想测验任务 
分类号:R395.1
出版年,卷(期):页码:2010,18(5):604-606
摘要:

目的:验证士兵内隐集体自尊效应,探讨其脑机制。方法:通过Go/No-go联想测验任务(Go/No-go Associa-tion Task,GNAT)测量士兵被试在"集体自我+积极"与"集体自我+消极"两种任务条件下的感受性指标(d')和反应时,同时记录事件相关电位数据。结果:GNAT感受性指标上,任务条件的主效应显著,F(1,15)=12.25,P=0.003;GNAT的反应时指标上,任务条件主效应显著,F(1,15)=8.557,P=0.010。P300潜伏期上,任务条件的主效应显著,F(1,15)=10.752,P=0.005;P300振幅上,任务条件的主效应显著,F(1,15)=24.636,P=0.000。结论:士兵内隐集体自尊效应基于对"集体自我+积极"信息的深度加工,是多脑区参与的同步系列活动。

Objective: To test the implicit collective self-esteem effect of soldiers,and to explore its brain mechanism.Methods: Implicit collective self-esteem of soldiers was measured by simultaneous recording of GNAT(Go/No-go Association Task) and ERP(event-related potential) data.The discriminability(d') and reaction indexes were measured under "collective self + positive" "collective self + negative" task conditions.Results: In the discriminability(d') of GNAT,the task condition main effects were significant,F(1,15)=12.25,P=0.003;In the reaction indexes of GNAT,the task condition main effects were significant,F(1,15)=8.557,P=0.010.In the P300 latency of ERP,the task condition main effects were significant,F(1,15)=10.752,P=0.005;In the P300 amplitude of ERP,the task condition main effects were significant,F(1,15)=24.636,P=0.000.Conclusion: The implicit collective self-esteem of soldiers based on deep processing of the "collective self + positive" information was a series of synchronized activities which had more than one area of the brain,which were in close contact.

基金项目:
作者简介:
参考文献:

[1] Gray HM,Ambady N,Lowenthal WT,Deldin P. P300 as an index of attention to self-relevant stimuli[J].Journal of Exporimental Social Psychology,2004.216-224.
[2] 许静. 内隐自尊的ERP与EB研究[D].上海:华东师范大学,2007.
[3] 杨福义,谭和平. 听觉障碍学生的内隐自尊及其影响因素研究[J].中国特殊教育,2008,(8):31-38.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-3728.2008.08.006.
[4] 高玥,陈图农,张宁. 抑郁症患者的内隐自尊研究[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2008,(4):426-428.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-1252.2008.04.030.
[5] 吕勇,王钰. 贫困大学生内隐、外显自尊与心理健康的关系[J].天津师范大学学报(社会科学版),2008,(1):71-75.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-1106.2008.01.014.
[6] 王凤姿,产文良. 大学生个人自尊、集体自尊与自我和谐水平的关系研究[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2008,(11):1224-1226.
[7] 薛松,李永鑫. 大学新生集体自尊与学习倦怠的关系[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2008,(6):640-641.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-1252.2008.06.018.
[8] 杨福义,梁宁建. 问题学生内隐自尊的初步研究[J].心理科学,2005,(2):332-336.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-6981.2005.02.019.
[9] Espinoza P. Ingroup-stereotypic explanatory bias:Assessment and enhancement of ingroup stereotyping[J].Dissertation Abstracts International Section B:The Sciences and Engineering,2004,(09):4676.
[10] Verkuyten M. The puzzle of hish self-esteem among ethnic minorities:Comparing explicit and implicit self-esteem[J].Self and Identify,2005,(02):177-192.doi:10.1080/13576500444000290.
[11] 王柳生,江燕. 女大学生内隐集体自尊研究[J].中华女子学院学报,2008,(3):31-37.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-3698.2008.03.006.
[12] 甘怡群,王纯,胡潇潇. 中国人的核心自我评价的理论构想[J].心理科学进展,2007,(2):217-223.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-3710.2007.02.005.
[13] 甘怡群,奚庄庄,胡月琴,张轶文. 核心自我评价预测学业倦怠的新成分:集体自尊[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),2007,(5):709-715.doi:10.3321/j.issn:0479-8023.2007.05.020.
[14] 苗丹民,王京生,刘立. 军事心理学手册[M].北京:中国轻工业出版社,2004.404.
[15] Koole S,Dijksterhuis A,Knippenberg A. What's in a name:Implicit self-esteem and the automatic self[J].Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2001.69-685.doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.4.669.
[16] 王登峰,崔红. 解读中国人的人格[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2005.
[17] Donchin E,Coles MGH. Is the P300 component a manifestation of cognitive updating[J].Behavioral and Brain Sciences,1988.357-427.
[18] Johnson R Jr. The amplitude of the P300 component of the event-related potential:Review and synthesis[J].Advances in Psychophysiology,1988.69-137.

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【加入收藏
您是第访问者

《中国临床心理学杂志》编辑部
地址:湖南省长沙市中南大学湘雅二医院内, 410011
电 话:0731-85292472    电子邮件:cjcp_china@163.com
本系统由北京博渊星辰网络科技有限公司设计开发 技术支持电话:010-63361626