中国临床心理学杂志

简式情感强度量表中文版的信效度检验

单位：1. 中南大学湘雅二医院医学心理研究中心湖南长沙 410011
2. 广东省深圳市精神卫生中心广东深圳 518020
3. 湖南农业大学科学技术师范学院

关键词：情感强度信度效度

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2010,18(5):556-558

摘要：

目的:建立简式情感强度量表(Short Affect Intensity Scale,SAIS)的中文版,并检验其信、效度。方法:831名大学生完成了SAIS等量表,有63人完成120张情绪图片的愉悦度和唤醒度的评分,另有91人间隔1个月第二次完成了SAIS。结果:SAIS中文版的Cronbach'sα系数总量表为0.86,三因子分别为0.86、0.75和0.84;条目间平均相关系数总量表为0.30,三因子分别为0.43、0.32和0.46;间隔1个月的重测信度总量表为0.83,三因子分别为0.79,0.82,0.85;各因子间的相关系数在0.39～0.62之间;正性情感强度与正性图片愉悦度及唤醒度的得分均存显著正相关,负性情感强度与负性图片的愉悦度显著负相关,而与负性图片的唤醒度得分显著正相关。验证性因素分析的指标:GFI为0.93,ACFI为0.92,CFI为0.95;RMSEA为0.045;条目对因子负荷系数在0.39-0.84之间。结论:简式情感强度量表中文版具有良好的信、效度,适用于我国大学生的情感强度评估。

Objective: To develop a Chinese version of Short Affect Intensity Scale(SAIS) and examine its reliability and validity.Methods: A sample of 831 undergraduate students finished SAIS and other scales,91 of them finished the SAIS twice,and 63 of them gave scores to the valence and arousal of 120 affective pictures.Results: The Cronbach's α coefficient of the SAIS was 0.86;the mean inter-item correlation coefficient was 0.30;the test-retest reliability coefficient was 0.83.The correlation coefficients among the three factors ranged from 0.39 to 0.62.The GFI(0.93),ACFI(0.92),CFI(0.95) and RMSEA(0.045) all met the criteria for adequacy of fit.Conclusion: The Chinese version of the SAIS is a reliable and valid measure for assessing affect intensity in Chinese undergraduate students.

基金项目：

高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金新教师基金项目(200805331003);中南大学理科发展基金项目(10SDF11)

作者简介：

参考文献：

[1] Larsen RJ,Diener E. Affect intensity as an individual difference characteristic:A review[J].Journal of Research in Personality,1987.1-39.doi:10.1016/0092-6566(87)90023-7.
[2] Geuens M,De Pelsmacker P. Individual differences and the communication effects of different types of emotional stimuli:"affect intensity" revisited[J].Psychology and Marketing,1999,(03):195-209.doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(199905)16:3<195::AID-MAR1>3.0.CO;2-Z.
[3] Moore DJ,Harris WD. Affect intensity and the consumer's attitude toward high impact emotional advertising appeals[J].Journal of Advertising,1996,(02):37-50.
[4] Williams DG. Neuroticism and extraversion in different factors of the affect intensity measure[J].Personality and Individual Differences,1989,(10):1095-1100.doi:10.1016/0191-8869(89)90261-4.
[5] Weinfurt KP,Bryant FB,Yarnold PR. The factor structure of the affect intensity measure-in search of a measurement model[J].Journal of Research in Personality,1994,(03):314-331.doi:10.1006/jrpe.1994.1023.
[6] Bryant FB,Yamold PR,Grimm LG. Toward a measurement model of the affect intensity measure:A three-factor structure[J].Journal of Research in Personality,1996,(02):223-247.doi:10.1006/jrpe.1996.0015.
Geuens MP,De Pelsmacker. Developing a short affect intensity scale[J].Psychological Reports,2002.657-670.doi:10.2466/PR0.91.6.657-670.
[7] Radloff. 流调中心用抑郁自评量表[A].北京:《中国心理卫生杂志》杂志社,1999.200-202.
[8] Lang PL,Bradley MM,Cuthbert BN. International affective picture System (IAPS):Instruction manual and affective ratings.Technical Report A-6[M].Gainesvile,FL:NIMH Center for the study of Emotion and Attention,University of Florida,2005.
[9] Briggs SR,Cheek JM. The role of factor analysis in the development and evaluation of personality scale[J].Journal of Personality,1986.106-148.doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1986.tb00391.x.
[10] 蚁金瑶,刘明矾,罗英姿,钟明天凌宇姚树桥. 情绪图片应答的性别差异研究[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2006,(06):583-585.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-3611.2006.06.011.

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】