中国临床心理学杂志

军官职业人格量表的效度

作者：王芙蓉¹ 邹韶红² 张亚林³

单位：1. 国防科学技术大学人文与社会科学学院湖南长沙 410074
2. 新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院新疆乌鲁木齐 830001
3. 中南大学湘雅二医院精神卫生研究所

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2010,18(4):451-454

摘要：

目的:检验中国军官职业人格量表(the Military Officer Vocational Personality Scale,MOVPS)的结构效度和效标关联效度。方法:1547名现役军官、215名士兵和83名公务员完成了MOVPS的测试,104名和99名军官在完成MOVPS的同时,分别完成了EPQ和MBTI的测试。结果:一阶因子、二阶因子分与总量表分的相关系数为0.334-0.779(P<0.001);所有一阶因子与其相应的二阶因子相关均较高(0.585-0.819),而与其它二阶因子相关均较低(0.009-0.284);由武德才能、人际自我组成的两因子模型拟合最优(χ²/df<5,RMSEA<0.08,RMR<0.04,其余各指标除了AGFI略低外,均≥0.90);一阶因子、二阶因子和总量表分与艾森克人格问卷之间相关达0.05水平的因子数共31个,占相关总数目的51.7%;一阶因子、二阶因子和总量表分与麦尔-布瑞格斯人格类型量表之间相关达0.05水平的因子数共18个,占相关总数目的30.0%;军官与士兵、公务员的MOVPS得分存在显著差异。结论:MOVPS结构合理,可以应用于中国军官的心理教育、训练、评估和选拔实践。

Objective:To evaluate the validity of the Military Officer Vocational Personality Scale(MOVPS).Methods:1547 military officers,215 soldiers and 83 civil servants were administered with MOVPS.104 officers were administered with MOVPS and EPQ.99 officers were administered with MOVPS and MBTI.Results:The correlations between the first-and second-order factor scores and the total scores ranged from 0.334 to 0.779.All the first-order factors had a higher correlation with their corresponding second-order factor than with the other second-order factor.The 2-factor model(D1:military virtue and faculty,D2:interpersonal relationship and selfhood.) fitted best between 2 theoretically constructed models.The number of significant correlation coefficients between MOVPS and EPQ was 31,which was 18 between MOVPS and MBTI,accounting for 51.7% and 30.0% of total correlation coefficients respectively.Significant differences existed among the scores of MOVPS of the military officers,soldiers and civil servants.Conclusion:The MOVPS has good validity and might be used in psychological education,training,evaluation,and selection of military officers.

基金项目：

作者简介：

参考文献：

[1] 朱晨海. 人格特质模型与特质进化观的研究[J].心理科学,2003,(04):753-754.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-6981.2003.04.055.
[2] 蔡永红,林崇德,肖丽萍. 中学生职业兴趣的结构及其特点[J].心理发展与教育,2002,(01):80-85.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-4918.2002.01.017.
[3] 陈向明. 质的研究方法与社会科学研究[M].北京:教育科学出版社,2000.211-226.
[4] 王芙蓉,张亚林,杨世昌. 军官职业人格量表的初步编制[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2006,(03):224-226.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-3611.2006.03.002.
[5] 罗正学. 陆军学院学员军事职业资格人格特征研究[D].西安:第四军医大学,2001.
[6] 金瑜. 心理测量[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2003.4.
[7] 王登峰,崔红. 中国人人格量表的信度与效度[J].心理学报,2004,(03):347-358.
[8] 芙蓉,陶嵘,张亚林. 中国军官职业人格模型的初步研究[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2008,(02):116-122.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-3611.2008.02.002.
[9] Tsung-Yuan H,Rebecca LO. Comparing theories of language learning strategies:A confirmatory factor analysis[J].Modern Language Journal,2002,(03):368-383.
[10] Mark FS,Judith CB. The vicissitudes of measurement:A confirmatory factor analysis of the Emotional Autonomy Scale[J].Child Development,2001,(01):207-219.
[11] 王焕林,崔庶,高柏良. 中国军人个性特征的调查分析[J].中华精神科杂志,1997,(03):179-182.
[12] 边海阔,梅桂森,陈元旺. 军人艾森克个性测试分析[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1996,(05):226.

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】