设为首页 | 加入收藏
网站首页 本刊简介 编委会 投稿指南 过刊浏览 广告合作 网上订购 下载专区 联系我们  
脑瘫患儿推理加工与心理理论相关研究
作者:李孝明1  汪凯1  吴建贤2  洪永峰2  赵敬璞2  冯小军2  徐梅2  汪敏3 
单位:1. 安徽医科大学医学心理学系 安徽合肥 230032 
2.
 安徽医科大学第二附属医院康复医学科 安徽合肥 230032 
3.
 安徽医科大学第一附属医院康复医学科 安徽合肥 230032 
关键词:脑瘫 推理加工 心理理论 
分类号:R395.2
出版年,卷(期):页码:2012,20(6):794-797
摘要:

目的:探究脑瘫患儿推理加工与心理理论的相关性。方法:选取35名脑瘫患儿和36名正常对照组儿童,接受语义推理(因果推理和预期推理)、语用推理(简单语用和复杂语用推理)和心理理论(错误信念和错误预期)测试。结果:在各测试任务上脑瘫组得分显著低于对照组;分层回归分析表明:因果推理对错误信念有预测作用,预期推理对错误预期有预测作用,简单语用推理对错误信念和错误预期都有预测作用,复杂语用推理对错误预期有预测作用。结论:脑瘫患儿的推理加工能力和心理理论落后于正常儿童,推理加工能力与心理理论具有相关性。

Objective: To explore the relation between inference processing and theory of mind in children with cerebral palsy.Methods: 35 children with cerebral palsy and 36 normal controls were assessed in the tasks of semantic inference(causal vs.predictive inference),pragmatic inference(simple vs.complex) and theory of mind(second-order false-belief vs.false expectation).Results: There were significant differences between children with cerebral palsy and normal controls in the tasks of inference processing and theory of mind;Hierarchical regression analyses showed that causal inference significantly predicted false belief;predictive inference significantly predicted false expectation;simple pragmatic inference significantly predicted false belief and false expectation;complex pragmatic inference significantly predicted false expectation.Conclusion: Inference processing and theory of mind in children with cerebral palsy lagged behind those in normal children,and inference processing was related to theory of mind.

基金项目:
国家自然科学基金(30870766);安徽省自然科学基金(11040606M166)
作者简介:
参考文献:

1.Premack D,Woodruff G. Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind[J].Behavioral and Brain Sciences,1978,(04):515-526.
2.Abbeduto L,Murphy MM. Language,social cognition,maladaptive behavior and communication in down syndrome and fragile X syndrome[A].London:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers,2004.77-97.
3.Hughes C,Lecce S,Wilson C. "Do you know what I want?" Preschoolers' talk about desires,thoughts and feelings in their conversations with sibs and friends[J].Cognition and Emotion,2007,(02):330-350.
4.Baron-Cohen S,Stone M,Jones R. Recognition of faux pas by normally developing children and children with asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism[J].Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders,1999,(05):407-418.
5.姚雨佳,马伟娜. 后天手语聋童的心理理论发展及相关因素[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2009,(04):400-402,407
6.Baron-Cohen S,Leslie A,Frith U. Does the autistic child have a "theory of mind?"[J].Cognition,1985,(01):37-46.
7.Lewis P,Abbeduto L,Murphy M. Cognitive,language and social-skills of individuals with fragile X syndrome with and without autism[J].Journal of Intellectual Disability Research,2006,(07):532-545.
8.Dahlgren SO,Dahlgren Sandberg A,Hjelmquist E. The non-specificity of theory of mind deficits:Evidence from children with communicative disabilities[J].European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,2003,(01):129-155.
9.Falkman KW,Dahlgren Sandberg A,Hjelmquist E. Theory of mind in children with severe speech and physical impairment (SSPI):A longitudinal study[J].International Journal of Disability,Development and Education,2005,(02):139-157.
10.Dahlgren SO,Dahlgren Sandberg A,Larsson M. Theory of mind in children with severe speech and physical impairments[J].Research In Developmental Disabilities,2010,(02):617-624.
11.Gibbs RW. Interpreting what speakers say and implicate[J].Brain and Language,1999,(03):466-485.
12.中国康复医学会儿童康复专业委员会. 小儿脑性瘫痪的定义、分型和诊断条件[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志,2007,(05):309.doi:10.3760/j:issn:0254-1424.2007.05.026.
13.Sourn-Bissaoui SL,Caillies S,Gierski F. Inference processing in adolescents with Asperger syndrome:Relationship with theory of mind abihties[J].Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders,2009,(03):797-808.
14.Sullivan K,Zaitchik D,Tager-Flusberg H. Preschoolers can attribute second-order beliefs[J].Developmental Psychology,1994,(03):395-402.
15.Pemer J,Wimmer H. "John thinks that Mary thinks that ?":Attribution of second-order beliefs by 5-to 10-year-old children[J].Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,1985,(03):437-471.
16.胡莹媛. 脑性瘫痪定义的历史沿革[J].中国康复理论与实践,2003,(05):257.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2003.05.002.
17.Holck P,Nettelbladt U,Dahlgren Sandberg A. Children with cerebral palsy,spina bifida and pragmatic language impairment:Differences and similarities in pragmatic ability[J].Research In Developmental Disabilities,2009,(05):942-951.
18.Holck P,Dahlgren Sandberg A,Nettelbladt U. Narrative ability in children with cerebral palsy[J].Research In Developmental Disabilities,2011,(01):262-270.

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【加入收藏
您是第访问者

《中国临床心理学杂志》编辑部
地址:湖南省长沙市中南大学湘雅二医院内, 410011
电 话:0731-85292472    电子邮件:cjcp_china@163.com
本系统由北京博渊星辰网络科技有限公司设计开发 技术支持电话:010-63361626