中国临床心理学杂志

抑郁大学生在自我参照编码任务中的认知加工偏向

作者：魏曙光¹ 张月娟²

单位：1. 首都师范大学心理系北京 100089
2. 武警医学院心理学研究所天津 300162

分类号：R395.2

出版年,卷(期):页码：2010,18(1):50-52

摘要：

目的：探讨抑郁大学生是否存在负性的社交依赖自我图式。方法：采用流调中心用抑郁量表(CES-D)、焦虑自评量表(SAS)对某大学500名学生进行测量，筛选出符合要求的被试共77名，其中抑郁组24人，焦虑组12人，抑郁焦虑组17人，正常对照组24人。严格筛选社交依赖人格形容词作为实验刺激，对抑郁组、焦虑组、抑郁焦虑组、正常对照组施测自我参照编码任务。结果：①抑郁组对正性词汇的认可量显著低于正常对照组(P＜0.01)，对负性词汇的认可量显著高于正常对照组(P＜0.001)，抑郁组对特质词、状态词的认可正偏向均显著低于正常对照组和焦虑组(P＜0.001，P＜0.05)；②抑郁组对状态词的反应时间偏向显著低于正常对照组和焦虑组(P＜0.05)。结论：抑郁大学生具有负性的社交依赖自我图式，但这些内容是状态性的。

Objective:To test whether depressive college students had sociotropic self-schemata. Methods:A total of 500 college students were surveyed by CES-D and SAS, and 77 college students were chosen for further experiment:24 with depressive mood, 12 with anxious mood, 17 with both depressive and anxious mood, and 24 normal ones. Sociotropic adjectives were strictly developed, and the 4 groups (depressive vs. anxious vs. depressive and anxious vs. normal) were given Self-referent Encoding Task. Results:①The depressive group showed significantly less positive adjectives and more negative adjectives for self-descriptive than the normal group (P<0.01, P<0.001), and more self-descriptive positive bias for trait and state adjectives than the normal and anxious groups (P<0.001, P<0.05). ②The depressive group showed significantly lower reaction time bias than the normal and anxious groups (P<0.05). Conclusion:The depressive college students have a negative sociotropic schemata with state content.

基金项目：

作者简介：

参考文献：

[1] Beck AT. Cognitive therapy:A 30-year retrospective. American psychologist,1991,46:368-375
[2] Gotlib IH,Traill SK,Montoya RL,et al. Attention and momory biases in the offspring of parents with bipolar disorder:Indications from a pilot study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry,2005,46(1):84-93
[3] Lim SL,Kim JH. cognitive processing of emotional infor mation in depression,panic,and somatoform disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology,2005,114(1):50-61
[4] 钱铭怡,李旭,张光健.轻度抑郁者在自我相关编码任务中的加工偏向.心理学报,1998，30(3)：337-342
[5] Dobson KS,Shaw B. The specificity and stability of self referential encoding in clinical depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology,1987,96:34-40
[6] 肖丰.关于抑郁的认知理论中自我图式的实验研究.心理科学,1994，3：186-188
[7] Beck AT. Cognitive therapy of depression:New perspectives. In Clayton PJ,Barrett JE. Treatment of depression:Old controversies and new approaches. New York,Raven,1983.265-290
[8] Ingram RE,Kendall PC,Smith TW,et al. Cognitive specificity in emotional distress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1987,53:734-742
[9] 张明园.精神科评定量表手册.长沙:湖南科学技术出版社，1998.27-41
[10] Dozois DJA. Cognitive organization and information proce ssing in clinical depression:The structure and function of sociotropic schemata. Doctor’ s thesis,Alberta:University of Calgary,1999.78-85
[11] 陈图农,杨杏梅,王志庆.抑郁症患者内隐记忆的自我参照效应.中国临床心理学杂志,2008，16(4)：351-354
[12] Dozois DJA,Dobson KS. Information processing and cognitive organization in unipolar depression:Specificity and comorbidity issues. Journal of Abnormal Psychology,2001,110:236-246
[13] Lemelin S,Baruch P,Vincent A,et al. Distractibility and processing resource deficit in major depression:Evidence for two deficient attentional processing models. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease,1997,185:542-548
[14] 刘明矾，黄任之，涂远亮,等.抑郁症患者对情绪词抑制功能的实验研究.中国临床心理学杂志,2007，15(2)：161-163

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】