|
目的:探讨尽责性和神经质影响拖延行为的中介机制。方法:从某高校大三学生中抽取134名大学生,施测大五人格简表,时间管理量表,情绪应对问卷,以被试自拟任务的完成率和任务完成个数作为拖延的客观指标,采用结构方程模型分析尽责性和神经质影响拖延行为的中介机制。结果:假设模型对数据的拟合程度很好(χ2=168.13,df=128,P<0.05,CFI=0.94,TLI=0.93,RMSEA=0.049,SRMR=0.079)。尽责性通过时间管理影响任务完成情况的间接效应为0.20,其90%的置信区间为[0.05,0.34],P<0.05;神经质经由情绪应对影响任务完成情况的间接效应为-0.18,其90%的置信区间为[-0.31,-0.06]P<0.05。两个间接效应的置信区间均不包括0,两条路径的完全中介效应均显著。结论:时间管理完全中介尽责性对拖延行为的影响,情绪应对完全中介神经质对拖延行为的影响,而且两种中介机制具有特异性。
|
|
Objective: To reveal the mechanismsthrough which conscientiousness and neuroticism influence procrastination. Methods: 134 undergraduates filled out a set of questionnaires which measured conscientiousness, neuroticism, time management, emotion-focused coping. Task compeletion rate and numbers of task finished were used to index procrastination behavior. AMOS was employed to conduct structural equation modeling analysis. Results: The hypothesized model fitted the data very well(χ2=168.13, df=128, P0.05, CFI=0.94, TLI=0.93, RMSEA=0.049, SRMR=0.079). The indirect effect from conscientiousness to procrastination through time management is significant, with a 90% confidence interval[0.05, 0.34], P<0.05>; the indirect effect from neuroticism to procrastination through negative coping is significant, with a 90% confidence interval[-0.31,-0.06], P<0.05> Conclusion: Time management fully mediated the relationship between conscientiousness and procrastination, and emotion-focused coping fully mediated the relationship between neuroticism and procrastination. Furthermore, conscientiousness and neuroticism influenced procrastination through different mediators.
|
|
1 楚翘，肖蓉，林倩. 大学生拖延行为状况与特点研究. 中国健康心理学杂志，2010，18(8)：970-972
2 Rothblum ED, Solomon LJ, Murakami J. Affective, cognit-ive, and behavioral differences between high and low procr-astinators. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1986, 33(4): 387-394
3 Watson DC. Procrastination and the five-factor model: A fa-cet level analysis. Personality and Individual Differences,2001, 30(1): 149-158
4 Steel P. The nature of procrastination: A meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure. Psychological Bulletin, 2007, 133(1): 65-94
5 Van Eerde W. Procrastination at work and time management training. J Psychol, 2003, 137(5): 421-434
6 Klassen RM, Ang RP, Chong WH, et al. Academic procrasti-nation in two settings: Motivation correlates, behavioral pat-terns, and negative impact of procrastination in canada and singapore. Applied Psychology-an International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale, 2010, 59(3): 361-379
7 庞维国，韩贵宁. 我国大学生学习拖延的现状与成因研究. 清华大学教育研究，2009，6：59-65
8 庞维国. 大学生学习拖延研究综述. 心理科学，2010，1：147-150
9 张斌，蔡太生. 大学生学业拖沓与自尊, 应对方式的相关性研究. 中国临床心理学杂志，2010，18(4)：501-503
10 田芊，邓士昌. 积极完美主义对拖延行为的影响: 自我效能感的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志，2011，19(2)：221-224
11 陈贵，蔡太生，胡凤姣，等. 中学生的拖延状况及相关因素研究. 中国临床心理学杂志，2012，20(4)：571-573
12 迟昊阳，赵冉，侯志瑾，等. 大学生完美主义与拖延: 成就动机的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志，2012，20(2)：233-236
13 Caredn R, Bryant C, Moss R. Locus of control, test anxiety, academic procrastination, and achievement among college students. Psychological Reports, 2004, 95(2): 581-582
14 田芊，邓士昌. 心理控制源在时间管理倾向影响唤起性，回避性两类拖延行为中的不同中介作用. 心理科学，2011，34(2)：348-353
15 张海燕，冯琳，王柳生. A 型人格大学生学习拖延原因分析. 中国学校卫生，2012，33(2)：160-161
16 Richards CS. Behavior modification of studying through study skills advice and self-control procedures. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1975, 22(5): 431-435
17 Lay CHS, Henri C. Trait procrastination, time management, and academic behavior. Journal of Social Behavior and Per-sonality, 1993, 8(4): 647-662
18 Costa PT, MacCrae RR. Revised neo personality inventory (neo pi-r) and neo five-factor inventory (neo ffi): Professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, 1992
19 McCrae RR, Costa Jr PT. Personality in adulthood: A five-factor theory perspective. Guilford Press, 2002
20 Griffiths RF. Time management in telework and other auton-omous work environments. ProQuest Information and Learn-ing, 2003
21 Folkman S, Lazarus RS. If it changes it must be a process: Study of emotion and coping during three stages of a college examination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1985, 48(1): 150-170
22 Zuckerman M, Kieffer SC, Knee CR. Consequences of self-handicapping: Effects on coping, academic performance, and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998, 74(6): 1619-1628
23 Tucker JA, Vuchinich RE, Sobell MB. Alcohol consumption as a self-handicapping strategy. Journal of Abnormal Psy-chology, 1981, 90(3): 220-230
24 Tice DM, Baumeister RF. Self-esteem, self-handicapping, and self-presentation: The strategy of inadequate practice. Journal of Personality, 1990, 58(2): 443-464
25 Bolger N, Schilling EA. Personality and the problems of ev-eryday life: The role of neuroticism in exposure and reactivi-ty to daily stressors. Journal of Personality, 1991, 59(3): 355-386
26 Connor-Smith JK, Flachsbart C. Relations between person-ality and coping: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2007, 93(6): 1080-1107
27 Cheung FM, Leung K, Zhang JX, et al. Indigenous Chinese personality constructs is the five-factor model complete? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 2001, 32(4): 407-433
28 Macan TH, Shahani C, Dipboye RL, et al. College students' time management: Correlations with academic performance and stress. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1990, 82(4): 760-768
29 姜乾金，祝一虹. 特质应对问卷的进一步探讨. 中国行为医学科学，1999，8(3)：167-169
30 Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee J-Y, et al. Common met-hod biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the li-terature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003, 88(5): 879-903
31 吴艳，温忠麟. 结构方程建模中的题目打包策略. 心理科学进展，2011，19(12)：1859-1867
32 MacKinnon DP, Lockwood CM, Williams J. Confidence lim-its for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate behavioral research, 2004, 39(1): 99-128
|