中国临床心理学杂志

依恋回避个体对依恋相关词汇的注意偏向研究

作者：李彩娜¹ 党健宁¹ 王武¹ 贾锐²

单位：1. 陕西师范大学心理学院西安 710062
2. 西安文理学院西安 710065

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2014,22(1):48-52

摘要：

目的:探索依恋回避个体的注意偏向。方法:采用"空间线索任务"范式考查了在依恋系统激活情况下,高、低依恋回避个体对三类不同词汇(依恋,情绪,中性)的注意偏向特点。结果:在有效线索条件下,低依恋回避个体对以依恋词汇为线索的靶刺激反应时显著小于以中性词汇为线索的靶刺激反应时,表现出对依恋相关信息的注意警觉;在无效线索条件下,高依恋回避个体对以依恋词汇为线索的靶刺激反应时小于以中性词汇为线索的靶刺激反应时,表现出对依恋相关信息的注意回避。结论:依恋回避个体的注意加工具有警觉—抑制的特点。

Objective: To explore the effects of adult attachment on attention. Methods: This study utilized a spatial cuing task, in which the SOA was set at 550ms and three different types of lexical information(attachment-related, emotion-related, neutral) as experimental materials. All participants were selected by ECR(Experiences in Close Relationship) and assigned into high or low attachment avoidant group based on their ECR scores. Results: The results revealed that participants with low avoidant attachment showed significantly shorter response latencies when the lexical cue was"attachmentrelated"relative to"neutral"on valid trials and took marginally significant longer response time when the cue was"emotion-related"relative to"neutral"on invalid trials; By contrast, participants with high avoidant attachment took marginally significant shorter response time when the cue was"attachment-related"relative to"neutral"on invalid trials. Conclusion: These findings suggest attentional bias in low avoidant attachment individuals may reflect a vigilance against the attachment-related information, namely having a tendency to seek closeness; while attentional bias in high avoidant attachment individuals may reflect a selectively attentional avoidance from the attachment-related information, hence they may be more easily disengaged from the attachment-related and less affected by the attachment-related lexical cues.

基金项目：

教育部人文社科研究一般项目(11YJC190012)；中央高校基本科研业务费2010年度专项资金项目(10SZZD05)的资助

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 Eccleston C, Crombez G. Pain demands attention: A cogni-tive-affective model of the interruptive function of pain. Psy-chological Bulletin, 1999, 125(3): 356-366
2 Amir N, Elias J, Klumpp H, Przeworski A. Attentional bias to threat in social phobia: Facilitated processing of threat or difficulty disengaging attention from threat? Behaviour Rese-arch and Therapy, 2003, 41(11): 1325-1335
3 Mathews A, Mackintosh B. A cognitive model of selective processing in anxiety. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1998, 22(6): 539-560
4 Bailey HN, Paret L, Battista C, Xue Y. Attachment anxiety and attentional control predict immediate and delayed emo-tional stroop interference. Emotion, 2012, 12(2): 376-383
5 马书采，肖祝祝，周爱保，等. 回避性依恋和注意偏向：刺激普遍性与刺激特定性. 心理科学，2011，34：1313-1319
6 Gotlib IH, Krasnoperova E, Yue DN, Joormann J. Attention-al biases for negative interpersonal stimuli in clinical depre-ssion. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 2004, 113(1): 121-135
7 Telzer EH, Mogg K, Bradley BP, Mai X, et al. Relationship between trait anxiety, prefrontal cortex, and attention bias to angry faces in children and adolescents. Biological Psychol-ogy, 2008, 79(2): 216-222
8 罗亚莉，张大均. 高特质愤怒者对负性情绪刺激注意偏向的潜在机制. 中国临床心理学杂志，2013，21(2)：180-185
9 杜巍，高红丽，闫春平，杨世昌. 不同人格类型对情绪信息注意偏向的影响. 中国临床心理学杂志，2012，20(3)：309-311
10 Bowlby J. Attachment and Loss: Volume 3. Loss: Sadness and depression. New York: Basic Books, 1980
11 Van Emmichoven IAZ, Van Ijzendoorn MH, De Ruiter CO-RINE, Brosschot J. Selective processing of threatening infor-mation: Effects of attachment representation and anxiety dis-order on attention and memory. Development and Psychopa-thology, 2003, 15(1): 219-237
12 Delius A, Bovenschen I, Spangler G. The inner working mo-del as a “theory of attachment”: Development during the pr-eschool years. Attachment and Human Development, 2008, 10(4): 395-414
13 Dykas MJ, Cassidy J. Attachment and the processing of so-cial information across the life span: Theory and evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 2011, 137(1): 19-46
14 Mikulincer M, Gillath O, Shaver PR.Activation of the attach-ment system in adulthood: Threat-related primes increase the accessibility of mental representations of attachment fig-ures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2002, 83 (4): 881-895
15 Edelstein RS. Attachment and emotional memory: Investig-ating the source and extent of avoidant memory impairments. Emotion, 2006, 6(2): 340-345
16 Dewitte M, Koster EH, De Houwer J, Buysse A. Attentive processing of threat and adult attachment: A dot-probe study. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 2007, 45(6): 1307-1317
17 Dewitte M, De Houwer J. Adult attachment and attention to positive and negative emotional face expressions. Journal of Research in Personality, 2008, 42(2): 498-505
18 Izetelny A. Attentional biases for negative and positive att-achment words associated with individual differences in adult attachment and defensiveness: Effects of stimulus con-tent, intensity, and valence. ProQuest, 2006
19 李同归，加藤和生. 成人依恋的测量：亲密关系经历量表 (ECR)中文版. 心理学报，2006，38：399-406
20 刘娟. 不同依恋风格大学生对情绪信息的注意偏向及其教育意义. 安徽师范大学硕士学位论文，2011
21 Posner MI. Measuring alertness. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2008, 1129(1): 193-199
22 李海江，杨娟，贾磊，张庆林. 不同自尊水平者的注意偏向. 心理学报，2011，43：907-916
23 Koster EH, Crombez G, Verschuere B, et al. Components of attentional bias to threat in high trait anxiety: Facilitated en-gagement, impaired disengagement, and attentional avoid-ance. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 2006, 44(12): 1757-1771
24 李敏. 不同成人依恋类型个体的注意偏向及其产生阶段. 杭州师范大学硕士学位论文，2008
25 Fox E, Russo R, Dutton K. Attentional bias for threat: Evi-dence for delayed disengagement from emotional faces. Cog-nition and Emotion, 2002, 16(3): 355-379
26 Mikulincer M, Birnbaum G, Woddis D, Nachmias O. Stress and accessibility of proximity-related thoughts: Exploring the normative and intraindividual components of attachment theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2000, 78(3): 509-523
27 Mikulincer M, Shaver PR. Attachment in adulthood: Struc-ture, dynamics, and change. New York: Guilford Press, 2007
28 Fraley RC, Garner JP, Shaver PR. Adult attachment and the defensive regulation of attention and memory: Examining the role of preemptive and postemptive defensive processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2000, 79(5): 816-826
29 Niedenthal PM, Brauer M, Robin L, Innes-Ker AH. Adult attachment and the perception of facial expression of emot-ion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2002, 82 (3): 419-433
30 Mikulincer M, Shaver PR, Pereg D. Attachment theory and affect regulation: The dynamics, development, and cognitive consequences of attachment-related strategies. Motivation and Emotion, 2003, 27(2): 77-102

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】