中国临床心理学杂志

低自尊个体的注意偏向特征:呈现方位和刺激材料的影响

作者：丁道群¹ 张湘一¹ 李彬¹ 陈锡友²

单位：1. 湖南师范大学教育科学学院长沙 410081
2. 长沙市实验中学长沙 410001

分类号：B844.2

出版年,卷(期):页码：2014,22(2):228-231

摘要：

目的:以低自尊个体对拒绝性信息的注意偏向为基础,考察点探测范式中不同呈现方位和刺激材料对注意偏向是否产生影响。方法:采用Rosenberg自尊量表(SES)筛选出自尊低分组的20名学生作为被试,采用点探测任务,研究低自尊个体对拒绝性、中性刺激的注意偏向。结果:低自尊个体对拒绝性刺激的反应时显著长于中性刺激;刺激材料上下呈现的反应时显著长于左右呈现;词语材料的反应时显著长于情绪面孔图片。结论:低自尊个体对拒绝性信息的注意偏向主要表现为注意的解脱困难;刺激材料左右呈现是区分低自尊个体注意偏向的有效呈现方位;面孔表情图片是区分低自尊个体注意偏向更有效的实验材料。

Objective: Using a dot-probe paradigm, to find the influence of different positions and materials on attentional bias to rejective information in low self-esteem subjects. Methods: 20 students were selected by using the SES scale and were required to execute a dot-probe task with social rejection cues. Results: The result showed that the response time to social rejection cues was significantly longer than that of neutral stimuli in low self-esteem subjects. Compared with top- bottom position, left-right position is more sensitive in probe detection task to distinguish subjects’attentional bias. This trend was more significant when emotional face was used as stimuli, suggesting students with low-esteem was more sensitive to emotional face than words. Conclusion: These findings suggest that attentional bias in low self-esteem participants may reflect a difficulty in disengaging from rejecting information. Word presented in left-right position is the best way in probe detection task to distinguish subjects’attentional bias. Moreover, the facial expression pictures were more sensitive materials than words to the attentional bias in low self-esteem participants.

基金项目：

全国教育科学规划教育部青年专项(EBA090436)资助

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 田录梅，李双. 自尊概念辨析. 心理学探新，2005，25(2)：26-29
2 Brosch T, Sander D, Pourtois G, Scherer KR. Beyond fear: Rapid spatial orienting toward positive emotional stimuli. Psychological Science, 2008, 19: 362-370
3 Cisler JM, Olatunji BO. Components of attentional biases in contamination fear: Evidence for difficulty in disengagement. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 2010, 48: 74-78
4 Dandeneau SD, Baldwin MW. The inhibition of socially rejecting information among people with high versus low selfesteem: The role of attentional bias and the effects of bias reduction training. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 2004, 23: 584-603
5 李海江，杨娟，贾磊，张庆林. 不同自尊水平者的注意偏向. 心理学报，2011，43(8)：907-916
6 Dandeneau SD, Baldwin MW. The buffering effects of rejection-inhibiting attentional training on social and performance threat among adult students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2009, 34(1): 42-50
7 Mogg K, Bradley BP. Selective orienting of attention to masked threat faces in social anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 2002, 40(12): 1403-1414
8 Hakamata Y, Lissek S, Bar-Haim Y, et al. Attention bias modification treatment: A meta-analysis toward the establishment of novel treatment for anxiety. Biological Psychiatry, 2010, 68: 982-990
9 Grafton B, Watkings E, MacLeod C. The ups and downs of cognitive bias: Dissociating the attentional characteristics of positive and negative affectivity. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 2012, 24(1): 33-53
10 王一牛，周立明，罗跃嘉. 汉语情感词系统的初步编制及评定. 中国心理卫生杂志，2008，22(8)：608-612
11 王妍，罗跃嘉. 大学生面孔表情材料的标准化及其评定. 中国临床心理学杂志，2005，13(4)：396-398
12 李海江，贾磊，罗俊龙，等. 低自尊个体注意偏向的ERP研究. 心理发展与教育，2013，1：1-9
13 李海江，杨娟，袁祥勇，等. 低自尊个体对拒绝性信息的注意偏向. 心理科学进展，2012，20(10)：1604-1613
14 Eysenck MW, Derakshan N, Santos R, Calvo MG. Anxiety and cognitive performance: Attentional control theory. Emotion, 2007, 7(2): 336-353
15 Gyurak A, Ayduk ?. Defensive physiological reactions to rejection: The effect of self-esteem and attentional control on startle responses. Psychological Science, 2007, 18(10): 886892
16 Hinojosa JA, Carretié L, Valcárcel MA, et al. Electrophysiological differences in the processing of affective information in words and pictures. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 2009, 9: 173-174
17 Kissler J, Assadollahi R, Herbert C. Emotional and semantic networks in visual word processing: insights from ERP studies. Progress in Brain Research, 2006, 156: 147-183
18 甘淑珍，李国瑞. 非临床社交焦虑个体的注意偏向特征. 心理科学，2010，33(3)：729-731
19 丁锦红，李扬. 视觉搜索中空间不对称性的眼动研究. 心理科学，2007，30(1)：116-119
20 Mathews A, MacLeod C. Discrimination of threat cues without awareness in anxiety states. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1986, 95: 131-138
21 Boduroglu A, Shah P, Nisbett RE. Cultural differences in allocation of attention in visual information processing. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 2009, 40(3): 349-360
22 Phil DL, Kevin KHC, Catherine McBride-Chang, Tong X. Holistic versus analytic processing: Evidence for a different approach to processing of Chinese at the word and character levels in Chinese children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 2010, 107: 466-478

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】