设为首页 | 加入收藏
网站首页 本刊简介 编委会 投稿指南 过刊浏览 广告合作 网上订购 下载专区 联系我们  
理性情绪教育改善高一学生的学业情绪
作者:马惠霞1  刘美廷1  张非易2 
单位:1. 天津师范大学心理与行为研究院 天津300074 
2.
 北京林业大学人文学院 北京100083 
关键词:高一学生 学科学业自我概念 学业情绪 理性情绪教育 干预研究 
分类号:B842.6
出版年,卷(期):页码:2012,20(1):116-119
摘要:

目的:考察理性情绪教育对增进学生良好学业情绪的作用。方法:采用《一般学科学业自我概念问卷》和《青少年学业情绪问卷》对343名初一、初二和高一学生进行调查。然后在所调查的高一年级中,选取调查结果无差异的两个班级,指定其中一个班为实验班(57人),另一个班为对照班(52人)。对实验班的学生进行为期8周的理性情绪教育课堂干预。结果:与对照班相比,实验班学生的积极高唤醒中的希望学业情绪的分数提高,而消极低唤醒中的厌倦和心烦学业情绪的分数降低;实验班在实验后,高唤醒学业情绪得分普遍降低,积极低唤醒学业情绪得分普遍提高,消极高唤醒中的焦虑和消极低唤醒中的沮丧学业情绪显著降低。同时,干预提高了学生的理科学业自我概念。结论:理性情绪教育可以增加高一学生的良好学业情绪,减少消极学业情绪;同时提高学科学业自我概念。

Objective: To study the effect on academic emotions of high-school students by rational-emotive educational mode. Methods: We investigated 343 students from grade 7, 8 and 10, in one school, using the Academic Selfconcept of General Subjects Questionnaire and the Adolescents Academic Emotions Questionnaire. In a random choosing of two non-differential classes from grade 10, one class (57 students) was made to be the experimental group, and another one (52 students) to be the control group. Then the experimental group accepted rational -emotive education for eight weeks. Results: After the intervention, hope of the experimental group was obviously higher in the positive-high arousal academic emotions and tired and dismay lower in the negative-low arousal academic emotions. Besides, distinct differences were found between the pre-test and post-test of experimental group in both the negative-high arousal academic emotions (anxiety, shame and anger) and negative-low arousal academic emotions. Conclusion: The rational-emotive educational mode is effective in increasing the positive academic emotions and reducing the negative academic emotions of the high-school students. At the same time, the academic self-concept of subjects is advanced.

基金项目:
教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(07JJDXLX265)
作者简介:
参考文献:

1 Shavelson RJ, Hubner JJ, Stanton GC. Self-concept:Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research,1976, 46: 407-441
2 郭成,何晓燕,张大均. 学科学业自我概念及其与学业成绩关系的研究述评. 心理科学,2006,29(1):133-136
3 Pekrun R, Goetz T, and Titz W, Perry RP. Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement:A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 2002, 37(2): 91-105
4 郭成. 青少年学科学业自我概念研究. 西南大学博士论文,2006
5 董妍,俞国良. 青少年学业情绪问卷的编制及应用. 心理学报,2007,39(5):852-860
6 吴丽娟. 理情教育课程设计. 台北:心理出版社,2001
7 Goetz T, Frenzel AC, Pekrun R. The domain specificity of academic emotional experiences. The Journal of Experimental Education, 2006, 75(1): 5-29
8 马惠霞,郭宏燕,沈德立. 系统心理干预增进初二学生良好学业情绪的实验研究. 心理科学,2009,32(4):778-782
9 马惠霞,聂胜昀,苏世将. 大学生考试情境下的学业情绪.心理与行为研究,2010,8(3):201-207,222
10 任智. 理性情绪教育对初中学生考试焦虑的干预实验研究. 湖南师范大学硕士学位论文,2005
11 邵晓云. 基于理性情绪教育的辅导课程对改善高中生不良情绪的效果研究. 华中师范大学硕士学位论文,2004
12 孟昭兰,编著. 情绪心理学. 北京:北京大学出版社,2003
13 马惠霞,著. 大学生学业情绪研究. 北京:北京师范大学出版社,2011

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【加入收藏
您是第访问者

《中国临床心理学杂志》编辑部
地址:湖南省长沙市中南大学湘雅二医院内, 410011
电 话:0731-85292472    电子邮件:cjcp_china@163.com
本系统由北京博渊星辰网络科技有限公司设计开发 技术支持电话:010-63361626