中国临床心理学杂志

独处行为量表的编制

作者：陈小莉¹ 戴晓阳² 鲍莉¹ 王蒙² 刘萌²

单位：1. 深圳大学师范学院附属中学广东深圳518000
2. 深圳大学师范学院心理学系广东深圳518060

分类号：B841.7

出版年,卷(期):页码：2012,20(1):1-4

摘要：

目的:编制一个独处行为量表,并对其信效度进行检验。方法:独处行为量表包括积极独处、孤僻、社交回避和孤独4个独立分量表,共34个条目。测试样本分别为534名大学生,252名高中学生,55名精神分裂症病人及其对照样本55名普通人。结果:①除两个条目的D值在0.2水平外,其余各条目均在0.3以上;题总净相关在0.323至0.680之间;②α系数均在0.76以上,重测信度系数在0.65以上;③大学生样本探索性因素分析结果显示4个因子累计可以解释总体变异的44.25%,条目的因子负荷在0.3~0.7之间,条目没有跨因子负荷的现象;对高中生样本验证性因素分析显示χ2/df=1.79,RMSEA=0.05,NFI=0.87,NNFI=0.93,CFI=0.94;④孤僻、社交回避及孤独三个分量表与社交回避及苦恼量表、UCLA孤独量表有不同程度的正相关;⑤正常人群在积极独处分量表的得分显著高于病人组,而在孤僻、孤独两个分量表的得分则相反。结论:结果显示独处行为量表有比较好的心理测量学指征。

Objective:To develop a Solitude Behavior Scale and examine its reliabilities and validities in this study.Methods: The scale consisted of Positive Solitude, Seclusiveness, Social Avoidance and Loneliness subscales. College students (N=534), high-school students (N=252), schizophrenic patients (N=55) and controls (N=55) were administrated. Results: ①The discriminations of most items were satisfactory (above 0.3). ②The Cronbach α of the four subscales were between 0.762 and 0.863; the stabilites of the four subscales were from 0.654 to 0.760. ③The result of EFA for college sample showed the four-factor model explained 44.25% variance and the construct of factors was very distinct. The result of CFA for high school students sample showed χ2/df =1.79, RMSEA=0.05, NFI=0.87, NNFI=0.93, CFI=0.94. ④There were significantly positive correlations (r from 0.318 to 0.821) among Seclusiveness, Social Avoidance and Loneliness subscales with Social Avoidance, Distress Scale and UCLA Loneliness Scale. ⑤Compared with the control sample, the schizophrenic patients obtained significantly lower scores in Positive Solitude subscale, but significantly higher scores in the three subscales of Seclusiveness, Social Avoidance and Soneliness. Conclusion: The Solitude Behavior Scale has good psychometric properties.

基金项目：

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 伯格（美）著. 陈会昌翻译. 人格心理学(第六版). 北京：中国轻工业出版社，2004. 233-254
2 戴晓阳，陈小莉，余洁琼. 积极独处及其心理学意义. 中国临床心理学杂志，2011，19(6)：830-833
3 Russell D, Peplau LA, Cutrona CE. The revised UCLA lonelinessscale: Concurrent and discriminant Validity evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980,39: 472-480
4 Peplau LA, Russell D, Heim M. The experience of loneliness.In Frieze I, Bar-Tal D, Carroll J. New approaches to social problems: Applications of attribution theory. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1979
5 Wateson D, Friend R. Measurement of social evaluative anxiety.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 33:448-457
6 林雄标，胡赤怡. 社交恐怖症的临床与认知特点. 上海精神医学，1997，9(2)：87-90
7 王登峰. Russell 孤独量表信度与效度. 中国临床心理学杂志，1995，3(1)：23-25
8 戴海崎，张锋，陈雪枫. 心理教育测量. 广州：暨南大学出版社，2003. 116-119
9 戴晓阳，曹亦薇. 心理评定量表的编制和修订中存在的一些问题. 中国临床心理学杂志，2009，17(5)：263-264
10 Burger JM. Individual differences in preference for solitude.Journal of Research in Personality, 1995, 29(1): 85-108
11 Cara Nicol MA. Self-determined motivation for solitude and relationship: Scale development and validation. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering,2006, 66(11-13): 6286
12 夏正夷，翟书涛，徐韬园. 临床精神医学. 湖南科技出版社，1984. 300

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】