中国临床心理学杂志

大学生对农民工的内隐身份污名:基于刻板解释偏差的探索

作者：陈晓惠¹ 毕兰凤¹ 余益兵²

单位：1 安徽农业大学人文社科学院合肥 230036
2 漳州师范学院教育科学与技术系漳州 363000

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2013,21(3):372-375

摘要：

目的:探讨大学生对农民工的内隐身份污名是否存在,同时考察社工和非社工专业大学生之间以及来自农村和城市大学生之间对农民工的内隐态度是否存在差异。方法:采用刻板解释偏差测量问卷对47名社工专业和50名非社工专业大学生进行测量。结果:大学生总体以及来源地为农村的大学生对农民工群体的消极行为做了更多的解释;大学生总体对农民工群体的积极行为的内归因数多于外归因数,社工专业和非社工专业以及来自于农村的大学生对农民工的积极行为也做了更多的内归因,来自于农村的大学生对城市居民的消极行为做了更多的内归因;来自于农村的大学生对农民工群体的积极行为倾向于内归因,对城市人群体的积极行为倾向于外归因。结论:大学生对农民工群体不存在内隐身份污名;社工专业和非社工专业大学生对农民工群体的态度没有差异;来自于农村的大学生对农民工群体的态度更加积极。

Objective: To explore whether identity-related stigma towards migrant workers exists among university stu dents, and investigate the difference between students who majored in social work and students majored in non-social work. Methods: 47 students who majored in social work and 50 students who majored in non-social work finished the study task through SEB questionnaires. Results: All students and students who were from rural areas made more explana tion for the negative behaviors of migrant workers; all students and students with different professions made more internal attribution to positive behaviors of migrant workers, along with students who were from rural areas, and they also made more internal attribution to negative behaviors of city dweller; students who were from rural areas tended to make internal attribution to positive behaviors of migrant workers, made external attribution to positive behaviors of city dweller. Conclusion: The implicit identity-related stigma towards migrant workers does not exist among the university students; the at titude towards migrant workers have no difference between students who majored in social work and majored in non-social work; students who are from rural area have more positive attitude towards migrant workers.

基金项目：

教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(11YJC190033)

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 詹玲. 农民工概念的理性思考. 北方经济，2008，9: 70-71
2 Yang LH, Kleinman A, Bruce G, Link, et al. Culture andstigma: Adding moral experience to stigma theory. SocialScience and Medicine, 2007, 64(7): 1524-1535
3 Major B, O' brien L. The social psychology of stigma. Annual Review of Psychology, 2005, 56: 393-421
4 李强，高文珺，许丹. 心理疾病污名形成理论述评．心理科学进展，2008，16(4): 582-589
5 张宝山，俞国良. 污名现象及其心理效应. 心理科学进展，2007，15(6): 993-1001
6 Teachman BA, Woody SR. Automatic processing in spiderphobia: Implicit fear associations over the course of treatment.Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 2003, 25: 294-302
7 郑健，刘力. 大学生对农民工的刻板印象内容与结构. 青年研究，2012，4: 35-40
8 董牮. 大学生对农民工的刻板印象研究. 长沙: 中南大学，2010
9 王丽丽. 大学生对农民工刻板印象的实验研究. 南京: 南京师范大学，2011
10 Corrigan P. How stigma interferes with mental health care. Am Psychol, 2004, 59(7): 614-625
11 Sekaquaptewa D, Espinaza P, Thompson M, et al. Stereotypic explanatory bias: Implicit stereotyping as a predictorof discrimination. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2003, 39: 75-82
12 管健.身份污名的建构与社会表征.青年研究，2006，3：21-27
13 Taylor, Peplau, Sears. 社会心理学. 谢晓菲，译. 第 10 版. 北京: 北京大学出版社，2005
14 俞海运，梁宁建. 刻板解释偏差测量. 心理科学，2006，28(1): 42-45
15 Gawronski B, Lebel EP. Understanding patterns of attitudechange: When implicit measures show change, but explicitmeasures do not. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,2008, 44: 1355-1361

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】