中国临床心理学杂志

中文版认知方式问卷及其操作化方式在大学生中的应用

作者：陈健¹ 3 周丽华² 3 燕良轼¹ 苏林雁²

单位：1 湖南师范大学心理学系长沙 410081
2 中南大学湘雅二医院精神卫生研究所长沙 410011
3 湖南工学院衡阳 421002

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2013,21(2):213-216

摘要：

目的:检验中文版认知方式问卷及合成分数与最大值两种认知易感操作化方式在大学生中的适用性。方法:用中文版认知方式问卷测量了426名大学生,并在8周后对其中60人进行了重测。部分被试完成了贝克抑郁问卷和归因方式问卷。结果:①总问卷的克龙巴赫Alpha系数为0.94,8周后的重测信度为0.59;②认知方式问卷的合成分数及最大值与同时施测的抑郁问卷总分、归因方式问卷总分都存在显著相关;③认知方式问卷的合成分数与最大值之间相关为0.91。结论:中文版认知方式问卷具有较好的信效度,可以用来测量我国大学生的认知方式。合成分数与最大值两种操作化方式具有一致性,建议采用合成分数。

Objective: To investigate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Cognitive Style Question naire (CSQ). Methods: The Chinese version of CSQ was used to assess 426 college students, 60 of them participated the retest 8 weeks later. Beck Depression Inventory(BDI) and Attributional Style Questionnaire(ASQ) were used as the criteriarelated validity instruments. Results: ①Cronbach' s a coefficient of the Chinese version of CSQ was 0.94, test-retest reli ability was 0.59; ②The composite score and the highest score of CSQ had significant correlation with BDI and ASQ which were tested in the same time; ③The correlation of the composite score and the highest score was 0.91. Conclusion: The Chinese version of CSQ has acceptable psychometric quality. The composite score has extensive overlap with the highest score.

基金项目：

国家自然科学基金(8117129)“儿童青少年双相障碍不同时相的表观遗传学、功能磁共振研究和早期预测模型”(课题负责人:苏林雁)

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 Abela JR, Stolow D, Mineka S, Yao S, et al. Cognitive vulnerability to depressive symptoms in adolescents in urbanand rural Hunan, China: A multiwave longitudinal study.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 2011, 120: 765-778
2 Gibb BE, Beevers CG, Andover MS, et al. The hopelessnesstheory of depression: A prospective multi- wave test of thevulnerability-stress hypothesis. Cognitive Therapy and Re-search, 2006, 30: 763-772
3 Haeffel GJ. Cognitive vulnerability to depressive symptomsin college students: A comparison of traditional, weakest-link, and flexibility operationalizations. Cognitive Therapyand Research, 2010, 34: 92-98
4 Haeffel GJ, Abramson LY, Brazy P, et al. Explicit and imp-licit cognition: A preliminary test of a dual-process theoryof cognitive vulnerability. Behaviour Research and Therapy,2007, 45: 1155-1167
5 Hankin B, Fraley RC, Abel J. Daily depression and cogni-tions about stress: Evidence for a traitlike depressogeniccognitive style and the prediction of depressive symptomsin a prospective daily diary study. Journal of Personalityand Social Psychology, 2005, 88:673-685
6 Lee A, Hankin BL, Mermelstein RJ. Perceived social com-petence, negative social interactions, and negative cognitivestyle predict depressive symptoms during adolescence. Jou-rnal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 2010, 39:603-615
7 Lau JY, Eley TC. Attributional style as a risk marker of ge-netic effects for adolescent depressive symptoms. Journal ofAbnormal Psychology, 2008, 117: 849-859
8 Alloy LB, Abramson LY, Walshaw PD, et al. Cognitive vul-nerability to unipolar and bipolar mood disorders. Journalof Social and Clinical Psychology, 2006, 25: 726-754
9 Hankin BL, Abramson LY, Miller N, et al. Cognitive vulner-ability -stress theories of depression: Examining affectivespecificity in the prediction of depression versus anxiety inthree prospective studies. Cognitive Therapy and Research,2004, 28: 309-345
10 Haeffel GJ, Gibb BE, Abramson LY, et al. Measuring cog-nitive vulnerability to depression: Development and valida-tion of the cognitive style questionnaire. Clinical PsychologyReview, 2008, 28: 824-836
11 Abela JR, Sarin S. Cognitive vulnerability to hopelessnessdepression: A chain is only as strong as its weakest link.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 2002, 26: 811-829
12 Sliverman RJ, Peterson C. Explanatory style of schizophr-enic and depressed outpatients. Cognitive Therapy and Re-search, 1993, 17(5): 457- 470
13 Fresco DM, Heimberg RG, Abramowitz A, et al. The effectof a negative mood priming challenge on dysfunctional attitudes, explanatory style, and explanatory flexibility. BritishJournal of Clinical Psychology, 2006, 45: 167-183
14 Abela, JR. The hopelessness theory of depression: A test ofthe diathesis -stress and causal mediation components inthird and seventh grade children. Journal of Abnormal ChildPsychology, 2001, 29: 241-254
15 周丽华, 陈健, 苏林雁. 无望抑郁认知易感操作化方法及其研究述评. 心理科学进展, 2012, 待发表
16 张雨新, 王燕, 钱铭怡. Beck 抑郁量表的信度和效度.中国心理卫生杂志, 1990, 4(4): 164-168
17 王纯, 张宁. 归因方式问卷的初步修订. 中国行为医学科学, 2006, 15(5): 470-471
18 Abramson LY, Metalsky FI, Alloy LB. Hopelessness depre-ssion: A theory based subtype of depression. PsychologicalReview, 1989, 96(2): 358-372
19 Alloy LB, Abramson LY, Hogan ME, et al. The temple-wis-consin cognitive vulnerability to depression (CVD) project:Life time history of Axis I psychopathology in individualsat high and low cognitive vulnerability to depression. Jour-nal of Abnormal Psychology, 2000, 109: 403-418
20 Hankin BL, Lakdawalla Z, Carter IL, et al. Are neurotocism,cognitive vulnerabilities and self-esteem overlapping or dis-tinct risks for depression? Evidence from exploratory andconfirmatory factor analyses. Journal of Social and ClinicalPsychology, 2007, 26: 29-63
21 Clark LA, Watson D. Constructing validity: Basic issues inobjective scale development. Psychological Assessment,1995, 7: 309-319

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】