中国临床心理学杂志

焦虑诱发对歧义性信息解释偏向的影响——基于跨自我/他人相关情境的探讨

作者：朱金卫¹ 2 张艳琴¹ 黄会欣¹ 张锋¹

单位：1. 宁波大学心理学系宁波 315211
2. 陕西学前师范学院教育科学系西安 710100

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2014,22(4):589-593

摘要：

目的:探讨即时性焦虑诱发对自我及他人相关歧义句解释偏向的影响。方法:通过外部压力操纵诱发焦虑状态,采用自陈报告法测量被试对歧义句的主观解释。结果:外部压力操纵所诱发的焦虑可导致个体对歧义句显著的负性解释偏向,该偏向不仅存在于自我相关(研究1)情境中,也存在于他人相关(研究2)情境中。结论:焦虑诱发对歧义性信息的解释偏向具有跨自我/他人相关情境的普遍性。

Objective:To explore whether induced anxiety have causal effects on interpretative bias across self/other-related situations.Methods: In the investigation 1, threatening feedback was displayed to induce anxiety mood on non-anxious-personality participants and then they were asked to select a threatening or a non-threatening interpretation to a set of self-related ambiguous sentences.In the investigation 2, similar procedures were employed to investigate whether the interpretation bias induced by anxiety can be generalized across situations.Results: Compared with the control groups, the participants in anxiety-induced groups selected significantly more threatening interpretations in the self-and other-related situations.Conclusion: The anxiety induced by external pressure tinges the cognitive interpretation of ambiguous events with negative emotion, finally leading to strengthened threatening-oriented interpretative bias.

基金项目：

陕西省哲学社会科学基金项目(10N018)资助;教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(10YJAXJX024)资助

作者简介：

参考文献：

[1] .Beck AT. Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders New York: International Universities Press, 1976.
[2] .Beck AT, Emery G, Greenherg RL. Anxiety disorders and phobias: A cognitive perspective. Basic Books, 2005
[3] Butler G, Mathews A. Cognitive processes in anxiety. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1983, 5(1): 5162.
[4] Eysenck MW, MacLeod C, Mathews A. Cognitive functioning and anxiety. Psychological Research, 1987, 49(2): 189195.
[5] Richards A, French CC. An anxiety-related bias in semantic activation when processing threat/neutral homographs. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 1992, 45(3): 503-525.
[6] Eysenck MW, Mogg K, May J, et al. Bias in interpretation of ambiguous sentences related to threat in anxiety. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1991,100(2): 144-150.
[7] Cody MW, Teachman BA. Post-event processing and memory bias for performance feedback in social anxiety. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 2010, 24(5): 468-479.
[8] Brozovich F, Heimberg RG. The relationship of post-event processing to self-evaluation of performance in social anxiety. Behavior Therapy, 2011, 42(2): 224-235.
[9] Mathews A, MacLeod C. Induced processing biases have ca-usal effects on anxiety. Cognition and Emotion, 2002,16(3): 331-354.
[10] Salemink E. Believing is seeing: the causal role of interpretive bias in anxiety. 2008, http://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/29634.
[11] Brosan L, Hoppitt L, Shelfer L, et al. Cognitive bias modification for attention and interpretation reduces trait and state anxiety in anxious patients referred to an out-patient service: Results from a pilot study. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 2011, 42(3): 258-264.
[12] Grey S, Mathews A. Effects of training on interpretation of emotional ambiguity. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 2000, 53(4): 1143-1162.
[13] Grey SJ, Mathews AM. Cognitive bias modification-priming with an ambiguous homograph is necessary to detect an interpretation training effect. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 2009, 40(2): 338-343.
[14] Holmes EA, Mathews A, Dalgleish T, Mackintosh B. Positive interpretation training: Effects of mental imagery versus verbal training on positive mood. Behavior Therapy, 2006, 37(3): 237-247.
[15] Lester KJ, Mathews A, Davison PS, et al. Modifying cognitive errors promotes cognitive well being: A new approach to bias modification. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 2011, 42(3): 298-308.
[16] Mathews A, Mackintosh B. Induced emotional interpretation bias and anxiety. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 2000, 109.(4): 602-615.
[17] Salemink E, van den Hout M. Trained interpretive bias survives mood change. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 2010, 41(3): 310-315.
[18] Salemink E, Wiers RW. Adolescent threat-related interpretive bias and its modification: The moderating role of regulatory control. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 2012, 50(1): 40-46.
[19] 李丹枫，余真真，段添翼，等解释偏向矫正对大学生演讲焦虑的影响中国临床心理学杂志，2014,22(1):43-47.
20 Franklin ME, Huppert J, Langner R, et al. Interpretation bias: a comparison of treated social phobics, untreated social phobics, and controls 1. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 2005, 29(3): 289-300.
[21] Lindstrom KM, Mandell DJ, Musa GJ, et al. Attention orientation in parents exposed to the 9/11 terrorist attacks and their children. Psychiatry research, 2011,187(1-2): 261-266.
[22] 张向葵，山录梅自尊对失败后抑郁、焦虑反应的缓冲效应心理学报，2005,37(2):240-245.
[23] 汪向东，王希林，马弘心理卫生评定量表手册增订版北京:中国心理卫生杂志社，1999.238-241.
[24] Hirsch C, Mathews A. Interpretative inferences when reading about emotional events. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1997, 35(12): 1123-1132.
[25] Mackintosh B, Mathews A, Yiend J, et al. Induced biases in emotional interpretation influence stress vulnerability and endure despite changes in context. Behavior Therapy, 2006, 37(3): 209-222.
[26] MacLeod C, Cohen IL. Anxiety and the interpretation of ambiguity: A text comprehension study. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1993, 102(2): 238-247.
[27] Hoppitt L, Mathews A, Yiend J, Mackintosh B. Cognitive bias modification: The critical role of active training in modifying emotional responses. Behavior Therapy, 2010, 41(1): 7381.
[28] Salemink E, van den Hout M. Trained interpretive bias survives mood change. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 2010, 41(3): 310-315.

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】