目的:检验自我独立性的城乡差异。方法:采用个人主义-集体主义问卷、框架直线任务、内隐社会取向问卷、归因偏差和象征性自我膨胀作为研究工具,对114名城市青年和115名农村青年实施问卷调查。结果:农村青年样本在水平的个人主义分量表(2.78±0.80 vs 2.59±0.63)和个人主义维度上(3.24±0.69 vs 3.08±0.57)的得分显著地高于城市青年样本的得分,而在垂直的集体主义分量表(3.11±0.68 vs 3.23±0.75)、四个场景中的社会判断的个人特征得分、自我象征性膨胀的直径比率(1.17±0.40 vs 0.88±0.43)以及积极分离情绪(自尊:3.29±0.31 vs 2.99±0.32和自豪:3.20±0.47 vs 2.43±0.56)和消极分离情绪上(沮丧感:3.50±0.30 vs 2.90±0.66和愤怒:3.18±0.41 vs 2.41±0.77),城市青年样本显著地高于农村青年样本。结论:城市青年比农村青年的独立性更强。

1 Markus HR, Kitayama S. Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion and motivation. Psychological Review, 1991, 98(2): 224-253
2 Nisbett RE, Peng K, Choi I, Norenzayan A. Culture and sys-tems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psycho-logical Review, 2001, 108: 291-310
3 Markus HR, Kitayama S. Models of agency: Sociocultural di-versity in the construction of action. In Berman G, Berman J. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Cross-cultural differ-ences in perspectives on the self. Lincoln: University of Ne-braska Press, 2004, 49: 1-57
4 Kitayama S, Mesquita B, Karasawa M. Cultural affordances and emotional experience: Socially engaging and disengag-ing emotions in Japan and the United States. Journal of Per-sonality and Social Psychology, 2006, 91: 890-903
5 Singelis TM. The measurement of independent and interde-pendent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1994, 20: 580-591
6 Cross SE, Gore JS, Morris ML. The relational-interdepend-ent self-construal, self-concept consistency, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2003, 85 (5): 933-944
7 张力为, 符明秋. 大学生自发反应式的互联自我与独立自我: 性别差异与专业差异. 心理学报, 1999, 4: 190-199
8 Hofstede G. Culture' s consequences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1980
9 Niwako Yamawaki. Within-culture variations of collectivism in Japan. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 2012, 43(8): 1191-1204
10 Cohen D. Law, social policy, and violence: The impact of re-gional cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psycholo-gy, 1996, 70: 961-978
11 Rice OK. West virginia: A history. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press, 1985
12 Marin G, Triandis HC. Allocentrism as an important charac-teristic of the behavior of Latin Americans and Hispanics. In Diaz-Guerrero R. Cross-cultural and national studies in so-cial psychology. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1985
13 Triandis HC. Culture and social behavior. New York: Mc-Graw Hill, 1994
14 Triandis HC, Bontempo R, Betancourt H, et al. The meas-urement of etic aspects of individualism and collectivism across cultures. Australian Journal of Psychology, 1986, 38: 257-267
15 Triandis HC. Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1995
16 Kitayama S, Duffy S, Kawamura T, Larsen JT. Perceiving an object and its context in different cultures: A cultural look at new look. Psychological Science, 2003, 14: 201-206
17 Kitayama S, Park H. Cultural shaping of self, emotion, and well-being: How does it work? Social and Personality Psy-chology Compass, 2007, 1: 202-222
18 Kitayama S, Ishii K, Imada T, et al. Voluntary settlement and the spirit of independence: Evidence from Japan' s “Northern frontier.”Journal of Personality and Social Psy-chology, 2006, 91: 369-384
19 Duffy S, Uchida Y, Kitayama S. Symbolic self-inflation: A cross-cultural comparison. Unpublished manuscript, Rut-gers, The State University of New Jersey, University Col-lege—Camden, 2008
20 Kitayama S, Park H, Sevincer AT, et al. A cultural task anal-ysis of implicit independence: Comparing North America, Western Europe, and East Asia. Kitayama, Shinobu; Park, Hyekyung; Sevincer, A. Timur; Karasawa, Mayumi; Uskul, Ayse K. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2009, 97(2): 236-255
21 Vallacher RR, Wegner DM. What do people think they' re doing? Action identification and human behavior. Psycholo-gical Review, 1987, 94: 3-15
22 Kitayama S. Culture and basic psychological processes—to-ward asystem view of culture: Comment on Oyserman, et al. Psychological Bulletin, 2002, 128: 89-96