中国临床心理学杂志

个人理论对刻板印象相关行为信息注意加工的调节作用

作者：余秋梅¹ 张锋²

单位：1. 昆明学院教师教育学院昆明 650214
2. 宁波大学心理学系宁波 315211

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2014,22(6):964-969

摘要：

目的:考察个人理论对性别刻板印象相关信息注意加工的调节机制。方法:翻译修订Levy等人编制的内隐个人理论测验(Implicit Person Theory Measure)作为研究筛选实验被试的工具,通过自编问卷确定实验材料,通过反应时范式考察个人理论对性别刻板印象相关信息注意分配的调节作用。结果:在高认知负荷条件下,实体论者将更多的注意资源分配于对与其刻板印象一致性信息的加工,而动态论者将更多的注意资源分配于对与其刻板印象不一致性信息的加工;在低认知负荷条件下,实体论者与动态论者对不同类型行为信息的注意分配不存在差异。结论:实体论者与动态论者对基于性别刻板印象行为信息的加工机制不同。

Objective: To explore the moderating effect of person theory on the attention processing on gender stereotype information. Methods: Implicit Person Theory Measure was translated and revised, which was used to screen the parcipants.and a self-administered questionnaire was applied to determine the experimental material. Results: Under high cognitive load, entity theorists allocated more attention to consistent information than to inconsistent information, whereas incremental theorists allocated more attention to inconsistent information than to consistent information. There were no significant differences of attention allocation for either entity theorists or incremental theorists in the low load condition. Conclusion: Person theory may influence the attentional processing on the gender stereotype information under high cognitive load conditions.

基金项目：

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 Hamilton DL, Sherman SJ. Perceiving persons and groups. Psychological Review, 1996, 103(3): 336-355
2 Tajfel H, Turner JC. The social identity theory of inter-group behavior In Worchel S, Austin W. The psychology of inter-group relations. Chicago: Nelson-Hall, 1986, 2: 7-24
3 Belmore S. Determinants of attention during impression for-mation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Me-mory, and Cognition, 1987,139(3): 480-489
4 Hastie R, Kumar PA. Person memory: Personality traits as organizing principles in memory for behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979, 37(1): 25-38
5 Hemsley GS, Marmurek HH. Person memory: The process-ing of consistent and inconsistent person information. Per-sonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1982, 8(3): 433-438
6 Hilton JL, Klein JG. von Hippel W. Attention allocation and impression formation. Personality and Social Psychology Bu-lletin, 1991, 17(4): 548-559
7 Sherman JW, Lee AY, Bessenoff GR, et al. Stereotype effici-ency reconsidered: Encoding flexibility under cognitive load. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998, 75(3): 589-606
8 Srull TK. Person memory: Some tests of associative storage and retrieval models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1981, 7(3): 440-463
9 Stangor C, McMillan D. Memory for expectancy-congruent and expectancy-incongruent information: A review of the so-cial and social developmental literatures. Psychological Bul-letin, 1992, 111(1): 42-61
10 Crocker J, Hannah D, Weber R. Person memory and causal attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1983, 44(1): 55-66
11 闫秀梅, 王美芳. 性别刻板印象对有意图特质推理的影响: 性别图式的调节作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2013, 21 (5): 739-742
12 Bodenhausen GV, Wyer RS. Effects of stereotypes in decis-ion making and information-processing strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1985, 48(2): 267-282
13 Macrae CN, Hewstone M, Griffiths RJ. Processing load and memory for stereotype-based information. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1993, 23(1): 77-87
14 Miller DT, Turnbull W. Expectancies and interpersonal pro-cesses. Annual Review of Psychology, 1986, 37(2): 233-256
15 Snyder M, Swann WB. Behavioral confirmation in social in-teraction: From social perception to social reality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1978, 14(1): 148-162
16 Devine PG, Baker S. Measurement of racial stereotype sub-typing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1991, 17 (1): 44-50
17 Lui L, Brewer MW. Recognition accuracy as evidence of cat-egory-consistency effects in person memory. Social Cogni-tion, 1983, 16(2): 89-107
18 Maass A, Salvi D, Arcuri L, et al. Language use in intergroup contexts: The linguistic intergroup bias. Journal of Person-ality and Social Psychology, 1989, 57(6):981-993
19 Bassok M, Trope Y. People' s strategies for testing hypothe-ses about another' s personality: Confirmatory or diagnostic. Social Cognition, 1984, 16(2): 199-216
20 Skov RB, Sherman SJ. Information-gathering processes: Di-agnosticity, hypothesis-confirmatory strategies, and perceiv-ed hypothesis confirmation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1986, 22(1): 93-121
21 Sherman JW, Frost LA. On the encoding of stereotype-relev-ant information under cognitive load. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2000, 34(1): 26-34
22 Plaks JE. StroessnerSJ, Dweck CS, et al. Person theories and attention allocation: Preferences for stereotypic versus coun-ter-stereotypic information. Journal of Personality and Soci-al Psychology, 2001, 80(6): 876-893
23 Plaks JE, Grant H, Dweck CS. Violations of implicit theories and the sense of prediction and control: Implications for mo-tivated person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2005, 88(2): 254-262
24 Dweck CS, Chiu C, Hong Y. Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A world from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 1995, 6(2): 267-285
25 Epstein S. Values from the perspective of cognitive-experi ential self-theory. In Eisenberg N, Reykowski J, Staub E. Social and moral values: Individual and social perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 1989. 31-61
26 Kelly GA. The psychology of personal constructs. New York: Norton, 1955
27 Rhodewalt F. Conceptions of ability, achievement goals, and individual differences in self-handicapping behavior: On the application of implicit theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1994, 62(1): 67-85
28 Sternberg RJ. Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity and wisdom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1985, 49(4): 607-627
29 Levy SR, Dweck CS. Trait vs. process-focused social judg-ment. Social Cognition, 1998, 16(1): 151-172
30 Levy SR, Stroessner SJ, Dweck CS. Stereotype formation and endorsement: The role of implicit theories. Journal of Per-sonality and Social Psychology, 1998, 74(9): 1421-1436
31 Wittenbrink B, Hilton JL, Gist PL. In search of similarity: Stereotypes as naive theories in social categorization. Social Cognition, 1998, 16(1): 31-55
32 Yzerbyt VY, Leyens JP, Corneille D. Social judgeability and the bogus pipeline: The role of naive theories of judgment in impression formation. Social Cognition, 1998, 16(1): 56-77
33 Dweck CS, Leggett EL. A social-cognitive approach to moti-vation and personality. Psychological Review, 1998, 25(1): 109-116
34 Chiu C, Hong Y, Dweck CS. Lay dispositionism and implicit theories of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1997, 42(1): 116-131
35 Erdley CA, Dweck CS. Children' s implicit personality theo-ries as predictors of their social judgments. Child Develop-ment, 1993, 64(7): 863-878
36 Gervey BM, Chiu CY, Hong Y, et al. Differential use of per-son information in decisions about guilt vs. innocence: The role of implicit theories. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1999, 25(1): 17-27
37 Hong Y. Predicting trait versus process inferences: The role of implicit theories. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Co-lumbia University, 1999
38 Levy SR, Dweck CS. The impact of children' s static versus dynamic conceptions of people on stereotype formation. Chi-ld Development, 1999, 70(8): 1163-1180
39 Sorich L, Dweck CS. Implicit theories as predictors of attri-butions for and response to wrongdoing. Unpublished Raw Data, 1996
40 李晓庆, 权朝鲁. 刻板印象对印象形成过程中信息加工的影响. 心理科学, 2005, 28(3): 598-601
41 Bartholow BD, Fabiani M, Gratton G, et al. A psychophysio-logical examination of cognitive processing of and affective responses to social expectancy violations. Psychological Sci-ence, 2001, 12(2): 197-204
42 Macrae CN, Bodenhausen GV, Schloerscheidt AM, et al. Tales of the unexpected: Executive function and person per-ception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1999, 76(1): 200-213

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】