设为首页 | 加入收藏
网站首页 本刊简介 编委会 投稿指南 过刊浏览 广告合作 网上订购 下载专区 联系我们  
权力增加还是降低观点采择?基于本土的验证
作者:吴漾1  温芳芳1  陈真珍2  佐斌1 
单位:1. 华中师范大学心理学院 青少年网络心理与行为教育部重点实验室 武汉 430079 
2.
 华东交通大学心理咨询中心 南昌 330013 
关键词:权力 观点采择 启动 文化 
分类号:R395.1
出版年,卷(期):页码:2014,22(6):957-963
摘要:

目的:在中国的文化背景下,针对权力对观点采择的影响是否与西方研究一致进行本土检验。方法:本研究使用写经历与语词启动的方式操作被试的权力水平,被试随后完成观点采择任务。结果:与低权力水平相比,高权力水平条件下被试的观点采择表现较差,且男性对权力启动更敏感。结论:在中国文化背景下,权力启动对观点采择的影响与西方研究结果相同,不存在文化差异。

Objective: To investigate the impact of power on perspective taking under. Methods: The present study manipulated power by experiential priming and scrambled sentence test, and participants later finished a perspective-taking task. Results: Relative to low power condition, high power level lowered participants'performance on perspective taking, and the male participants were more susceptible to power priming. Conclusion: Consistent with the fingdings in previous Western studies, this study suggest that in the Chinese culture, power may be positively predict the perspective-taking.

基金项目:
作者简介:
参考文献:

1 赵显, 刘力, 张笑笑, 等. 观点采择: 概念、操纵及其对群际关系的影响. 心理科学进展, 2013, 20(12): 2079-2088
2 Todd AR, Bodenhausen GV, Richeson JA, Galinsky AD. Perspective taking combats automatic expressions of racial bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2011, 100 (6): 1027-1042
3 Todd AR, Burgmer P. Perspective taking and automatic in-tergroup evaluation change: testing an associative self-anchoring account. Journal of Personality and Social Psy-chology, 2013, 104(5): 786-802
4 Yang Q, Zhao Y. The effect of perspective taking on nega-tive cognitive responses induced by intergroup threat. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 2013, 41 (6): 901-905
5 Galinsky AD, Wang CS, Ku G. Perspective-takers behave more stereotypically. Journal of Personality and Social Psy-chology, 2008, 95(2): 404-419 6 Tarrant M, Calitri R, Weston D. Social identification struc-tures the effects of perspective taking. Psychological Sci-ence, 2012, 23(9): 973-978
7 Vorauer JD, Sucharyna TA. Potential negative effects of pe-rspective-taking efforts in the context of close relationships: Increased bias and reduced satisfaction. Journal of Personal-ity and Social Psychology, 2013, 104(1): 70-86
8 Roβnagel C. Cognitive load and perspective-taking: Apply-ing the automatic-controlled distinction to verbal communi-cation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2000, 30(3): 429-445
9 Epley N, Keysar B, Van Boven L, Gilovich T. Perspective taking as egocentric anchoring and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2004, 87(3): 327-339
10 Zhang X, Fung HH, Stanley JT, et al. Perspective taking in older age revisited: a motivational perspective. Developmen-tal Psychology, 2013, 49(10): 1848-1858
11 Wu S, Keysar B. The effect of culture on perspective taking. Psychological Science, 2007, 18(7): 600-606
12 Fiske ST, Taylor SE. Social cognition: From brains to cul-ture. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications Inc, 2013
13 O' Brien E, Konrath SH, Gruhn D, Hagen AL. Empathic co-ncern and perspective taking: Linear and quadratic effects of age across the adult life span. Journal of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 2013, 68(2): 168-175
14 Van der Graaff J, Branje S, De Wied M, et al. Perspective taking and empathic concern in adolescence: Gender differ-ences in developmental changes. Developmental Psychology, 2013
15 Derntl B, Finkelmeyer A, Eickhoff S, et al. Multidimensional assessment of empathic abilities: Neural correlates and gen-der differences. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 2010, 35(1): 67-82
16 Galinsky AD, Magee JC, Inesi ME, Gruenfeld DH. Power and perspective not taken. Psychological Science, 2006, 17 (12): 1068-1074
17 韦庆旺, 俞国良. 权力的社会认知研究述评. 心理科学进展, 2009, 17(6): 1336-1343
18 Keltner D, Vankleef GA, Chen S, Kraus MW. A reciprocal influence model of social power: Emerging principles and lines of inquiry. In Zanna MP, et al. Advances in Experi-mental Social Psychology(Vol. 40, pp. 151-192). Salt Lake City: Academic Press, 2008
19 Keltner D, Gruenfeld DH, Anderson C. Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 2003, 110(2): 265-284 20 Lammers J, Stapel DA. Power increases dehumanization. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 2011, 14(1): 113-126
21 Galinsky AD, Gruenfeld DH, Magee JC. From power to act-ion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2003, 85 (3): 453-466
22 Converse BA, Lin S, Keysar B, Epley N. In the mood to get over yourself: Mood affects theory-of-mind use. Emotion, 2008, 8(5): 725-730
23 Smith PK, Trope Y. You focus on the forest when you' re in charge of the trees: Power priming and abstract information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2006, 90(4): 578-596
24 Rast III DE, Gaffney AM, Hogg MA, Crisp RJ. Leadership under uncertainty: When leaders who are non-prototypical group members can gain support. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2012, 48(3): 646-653
25 Schoel C, Bluemke M, Mueller P, Stahlberg D. When autocr-atic leaders become an option--uncertainty and self-esteem predict implicit leadership preferences. Journal of Personal-ity and Social Psychology, 2011, 101(3): 521-540
26 Mast MS, Jonas K, Hall JA. Give a person power and he or she will show interpersonal sensitivity: The phenomenon and its why and when. Journal of Personality and Social Psycho-logy, 2009, 97(5): 835-850
27 Côté S, Kraus MW, Cheng BH, et al. Social power facilitates the effect of prosocial orientation on empathic accuracy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2011, 101(2):217-232
28 Guinote A. Power and affordances: When the situation has more power over powerful than powerless individuals. Jour-nal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2008, 95(2): 237-252
29 Guinote A. Power affects basic cognition: Increased attent-ional inhibition and flexibility. Journal of Experimental So-cial Psychology, 2007, 43: 685-697
30 Guinote A, Weick M, Cai A. Does power magnify the expres-sion of dispositions? Psychological Science, 2012, 23(5): 475-482
31 vOverbeck JR, Park B. When power does not corrupt: Super-ior individuation processes among powerful perceivers. Jour-nal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2011, 81(4): 549-565
32 魏秋江, 段锦云, 范庭卫. 权力操作范式的分析与比较. 心理科学进展, 2012, 20(9): 1507-1518
33 Chen S, Lee-Chai AY, Bargh JA. Relationship orientation as a moderator of the effects of social power. Journal of Person-ality and Social Psychology, 2001, 80(2): 173-187
34 Torelli CJ, Shavitt S. Culture and concepts of power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2010, 99(4): 703-723
35 Zhong CB, Magee JC, Maddux WW, Galinsky AD. Power, culture, and action: Considerations in the expression and en-actment of power in East Asian and Western societies. In Mannix EA, Neale MA, Chen Y, et al. Research on Manag-ing in Teams and Groups(Vol. 9, pp: 53-73). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 2006
36 Ng IW-c. A cross cultural study of power and power motiva-tion in China and the United States. (Doctoral dissertation), University of Michigan, 2007
37 Chen S, Langner CA, Mendoza-Denton R. When disposit-ional and role power fit: Implications for self-expression and self-other congruence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2009, 96(3): 710-727
38 Keysar B, Barr DJ, Balin JA, Brauner JS. Taking perspective in conversation: The role of mutual knowledge in compreh-ension. Psychological Science, 2000, 11(1): 32-38
39 Bargh JA, Chartrand TL. The mind in the middle: A practi-cal guide to priming and automaticity research. In Reis HT, Judd CM, et al. Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000
40 Wu S, Keysar B. The effect of information overlap on comm-unication effectiveness. Cognitive Science, 2007, 31(1): 169-181
41 Keysar B, Henly AS. Speakers'overestimation of their eff-ectiveness. Psychological Science, 2002, 13(3): 207-212
42 Jiang T. Intimate authority: The rule of ritual in classical co-nfucian political discourse. In Hershock PD, Ames RT, et al. Confucian cultures of authority(pp. 21-47). New York, Am-erica: State University of New York Press, 2006
43 Vescio TK, Gervais SJ, Snyder M, Hoover A. Power and the creation of patronizing environments: the stereotype-based behaviors of the powerful and their effects on female perfor-mance in masculine domains. Journal of Personality and So-cial Psychology, 2005, 88(4): 658-672
44 Vescio TK, Schlenker KA, Lenes JG. Power and sexism. In Guinote A, Vescio TK, et al. The social psychology of power (pp. 363-380). New York: The Guilford Press, 2010
45 Boaler J. When do girls prefer football to fashion? An analy-sis of female underachievement in relation to ‘realistic' ma-thematic contexts. British Educational Research Journal, 1994, 20(5): 551-564
46 Zhang L-F. Do age and gender make a difference in the re-lationship between intellectual styles and abilities? Europe-an Journal of Psychology of Education, 2010, 25(1): 87-103
47 钟毅平, 张珊明, 陈芸. 不同权力者人际敏感性的差异. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2013, 21(1): 62-65

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【加入收藏
您是第访问者

《中国临床心理学杂志》编辑部
地址:湖南省长沙市中南大学湘雅二医院内, 410011
电 话:0731-85292472    电子邮件:cjcp_china@163.com
本系统由北京博渊星辰网络科技有限公司设计开发 技术支持电话:010-63361626