设为首页 | 加入收藏
网站首页 本刊简介 编委会 投稿指南 过刊浏览 广告合作 网上订购 下载专区 联系我们  
人在丧失控制感后会如何?——来自补偿性控制理论的揭示
作者:白洁  郭永玉  杨沈龙 
单位:1. 华中师范大学心理学院  青少年网络心理与行为教育部重点实验室  湖北省人的发展与心理健康重点实验室  武汉 430079 2. 南京师范大学心理学院  南京 210097 3. 西安交通大学人文社会科学学院社会心理学研究所  西安 710049 
关键词:补偿性控制理论 泛化结构确认 阴谋论 系统合理化 
分类号:R395.6
出版年,卷(期):页码:2017,25(5):982-985
摘要:

自1975年Seligman开展了经典的习得性无助实验以来,个体丧失控制感的心理与行为后果已成为控制感领域重要的研究议题。相比于传统研究视角更多关注丧失控制感对身心健康的影响,新兴的补偿性控制理论则提出个体在丧失控制感后会产生特殊的补偿途径,即泛化结构确认。建立在这一理论之上,大量研究发现泛化结构确认倾向会进一步使个体产生模式识别、信奉阴谋论、推崇精英主义等知觉、信念、行为的变化。未来研究者应逐步实现补偿性控制理论的深化;且应在中国文化背景下开展研究,以探讨中国人特有的泛化结构确认倾向。

Since Seligman carried out classic learned helplessness in 1975, it has been an important research issue that how people will respond to loss of perceived control. Compared to traditional perspective which more emphasize the effects of reduced control on physical and mental health, the emerging compensatory control theory proposes that people will deal reduced control with a special strategy, nonspecific structure affirmation. On the basis of this claim, numerous studies re-veal that nonspecific structure affirmation will further cause perceptional, ideological and behavioral changes, including per-ceiving more illusory patterns, believing conspiracy theories, supporting meritocracy and so on. Future researcher should gradually devote to deepening theory standpoints. More studies should be taken under the Chinese culture background so as to explore of Chinese people's unique nonspecific structure affirmation tendencies.

基金项目:
作者简介:
参考文献:

1 Erikson EH. Childhood and society(2nd ed.) New York:Norton, 1963
2 曾旻, 周宵, 伍新春, 等. 创伤暴露程度对中学生创伤后应激障碍的影响:控制感的调节作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2017, 25(1):59-64
3 Cheng C, Cheung S, Chio JH, et al. Cultural meaning of perceived control:A meta-analysis of locus of control and psychological symptoms across 18 cultural regions. Psychological Bulletin, 2013, 139(1):152-188
4 Infurna FJ, Gerstorf D. Perceived control relates to better functional health and lower cardio-metabolic risk:The mediating role of physical activity. Health Psychology, 2014, 33 (1):85-94
5 Turiano NA, Chapman BP, Agrigoroaei S, et al. Perceived control reduces mortality risk at low, not high, education levels. Health Psychology, 2014, 33(8):883-890
6 Seligman MEP. Helplessness:On depression, development, and death. WH Freeman/Times Books/Henry Holt & Co, 1975
7 Langer EJ, Rodin J. The effects of choice and enhanced personal responsibility for the aged:a field experiment in an institutional setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976, 34(2):191-198
8 Whitson JA, Galinsky AD. Lacking control increases illusory pattern perception. Science, 2008, 322(5898):115-117
9 Uscinski JE, Parent JM, Torres B. Conspiracy theories are for losers. Paper Presented at the 2011 American Political Science Association Annual Conference, Seattle, WA, 2011
10 Kay AC, Whitson JA, Gaucher D, et al. Compensatory control achieving order through the mind, our institutions, and the heavens. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2009, 18(5):264-268
11 Kay AC, Eibach RP. Compensatory control and its implications for ideological extremism. Journal of Social Issues, 2013, 69(3):564-585
12 Landau MJ, Kay AC, Whitson JA. Compensatory control and the appeal of a structured world. Psychological Bulletin, 2015, 141(3):694-722
13 王艳丽, 杨沈龙, 郭永玉, 等. 结构需求的适应性与非适应性功能. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2016, 24(5):950-953
14 Kolers PA. Aspects of motion perception. Oxford, England:Pergamon Press, 1972
15 Stea JN, Hodgins DC. The relationship between lack of control and illusory pattern perception among at-risk gamblers and at-risk cannabis users. The Social Science Journal, 2012, 49(4):528-536
16 Rutjens BT, van der Pligt J, van Harreveld F. Deus or Darwin:Randomness and belief in theories about the origin of life. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2010, 46(6):1078-1080
17 Rutjens BT, van Harreveld F, van der Pligt J, et al. Steps, stages, and structure:Finding compensatory order in scientific theories. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 2013, 142(2):313-318
18 鲁子健. 中国历史上的占星术. 社会科学研究, 1998, 2:113-118
19 Padgett VR, Jorgenson DO. Superstition and economic threat:Germany 1918-1940. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1982, 8(4):736-741
20 Wang CS, Whitson JA, Menon T. Culture, control, and illusory pattern perception. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2012, 3(5):630-638
21 Greenaway KH, Louis WR, Hornsey MJ. Loss of control increases belief in precognition and belief in precognition increases control. PloS one, 2013, 8(8):e71327
22 van Prooijen JW, Acker M. The influence of control on belief in conspiracy theories:Conceptual and applied extensions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2015, 29(5):753-761
23 van Prooijen JW, Jostmann NB. Belief in conspiracy theories:The influence of uncertainty and perceived morality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2013, 43(1):109-115
24 Sullivan D, Landau MJ, Rothschild ZK. An existential function of enemyship:Evidence that people attribute influence to personal and political enemies to compensate for threats to control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2010, 98(3):434-449
25 Rothschild ZK, Landau MJ, Sullivan D, et al. A dual-motive model of scapegoating:Displacing blame to reduce guilt or increase control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2012, 102(6):1148-1163
26 Bellah RN, Madsen R, Sullivan WM, et al.Habits of the heart:Individualism and commitment in American life. Berkeley, CA:University of California Press, 1996
27 Friesen JP, Kay AC, Eibach RP, et al. Seeking structure in social organization:Compensatory control and the psychological advantages of hierarchy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2014, 106(4):590-609
28 Goode C, Keefer LA, Molina LE. A compensatory control account of meritocracy. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 2014, 2(1):313-334
29 Shepherd S, Kay AC, Landau MJ, et al. Evidence for the specificity of control motivations in worldview defense:Distinguishing compensatory control from uncertainty management and terror management processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2011, 47(5):949-958
30 Kay AC, Zanna MP. A contextual analysis of the social and psychological consequences of system justification. In JT Jost, AC Kay, H Thoristtodor(Eds.), Social and psychological bases of ideology and system justification. New York, NY:Oxford University Press, 2009. 158-182
31 Kay AC, Shepherd S, Blatz CW, et al. For God (or) country:the hydraulic relation between government instability and belief in religious sources of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2010, 99(5):725-739
32 Kay AC, Sullivan D, Landau MJ. Psychological importance of beliefs in control and order:Historical and contemporary perspectives in social and personality. In M Mikulincer, PR Shaver(Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology. Vol. 1:Attitudes and social cognition. Washington, DC:American Psychological Association, 2015. 309-337
33 Kay AC, Gaucher D, Napier JL, et al. God and the government:Testing a compensatory control mechanism for the support of external systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2008, 95(1):18-35
34 Cutright KM. The beauty of boundaries:When and why we seek structure in consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 2012, 38(5):775-790
35 林少龙, 骆少康, 纪婉萍. 延伸相似度对于品牌延伸的成功重要吗——消费者多样化寻觅与内在控制的调节角色. 南开管理评论, 2014, 6:139-148
36 Cutright KM, Bettman JR, Fitzsimons GJ. Putting brands in their place:How a lack of control keeps brands contained. Journal of Marketing Research, 2013, 50(3):365-377
37 Chae B, Zhu R. Environmental disorder leads to self-regulatory failure. Journal of Consumer Research, 2014, 40(6):1203-1218
38 Kay AC, Laurin K, Fitzsimons GM, et al. A functional basis for structure-seeking:Exposure to structure promotes willingness to engage in motivated action. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 2014, 143(2):486-491
39 Zhou X, He L, Yang Q, et al. Control deprivation and styles of thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2012, 102(3):460-478
40 Zhu LL, Kay AC, Eibach RP. A test of the flexible ideology hypothesis:System justification motives interact with ideological cueing to predict political judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2013, 49(4):755-758
41 姚周辉. 神秘的幻术:降神附体风俗探究. 广西人民出版社, 2004

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【加入收藏
您是第访问者

《中国临床心理学杂志》编辑部
地址:湖南省长沙市中南大学湘雅二医院内, 410011
电 话:0731-85292472    电子邮件:cjcp_china@163.com
本系统由北京博渊星辰网络科技有限公司设计开发 技术支持电话:010-63361626