设为首页 | 加入收藏
网站首页 本刊简介 编委会 投稿指南 过刊浏览 广告合作 网上订购 下载专区 联系我们  
父母协同教养问卷青少年评定版的修订及其信效度检验
作者:刘畅  伍新春  邹盛奇 
单位:1. 北京教育学院学前教育学院  北京 100120 2. 北京师范大学心理学院  应用实验心理北京市重点实验室  北京 100875 
关键词:协同教养 青少年 信度 效度 
分类号:R395.1
出版年,卷(期):页码:2017,25(5):845-849
摘要:

目的:基于父母评价的协同教养问卷,修订父母协同教养问卷青少年评定版。方法:通过方便取样对北京及广西的295名学生施测,进行项目分析、探索性因素分析和效标效度分析。通过方便取样,对全国3045名小学、初中及高中学生实施问卷调查,进行验证性因素分析,计算Cronbach’s α系数。通过方便取样对北京和湖北的276名学生施测,计算重测信度。结果:父母协同教养问卷青少年评定版的父亲版与母亲版在探索性因素分析中均包括团结、一致、冲突和贬低四个维度;验证性因素分析表明父亲版与母亲版四因素模型均拟合良好,各维度间均存在中低程度的显著相关。父亲版与母亲版的团结、一致维度与青少年的情绪问题呈显著负相关,冲突、贬低维度与青少年的情绪问题呈显著正相关。父亲版与母亲版各维度Cronbach’s α系数均在0.9以上,重测信度均在0.6以上。结论:父母协同教养问卷青少年评定版具有良好的信效度,可作为青少年家庭父母协同教养研究的工具。

Objective: Based on Co-parenting scale, this study revised the adolescence evaluation version. Methods: A sample of 295 students in Beijing and Guangxi was tested for item analysis, exploratory factor analysis and criterion validity analysis. By convenience sampling, 3045 students from primary school, junior high school and senior high school nation-wide were tested for confirmatory factor analysis and reliability. A sample of 276 students in Beijing and Hubei was tested for retest reliability. Results: In both of adolescence evaluation revision of father and mother version, exploratory factor analysis revealed four distinct factors indexing:family integrity, reprimand, conflict and disparagement; confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the four-factor model. Family integrity and reprimand had significant negative correlation with emotion-al problems of adolescence, and conflict and disparagement had significant positive correlation with emotional problems of adolescence. The Cronbach's α of four dimensions were above 0.9, the retest reliabilities were above 0.6 in the adolescence revision. Conclusion: The adolescence revision of Co-parenting Scale is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing coparenting in adolescence families.

基金项目:
北京市教育科学“十二五”规划2015年度课题“父亲与母亲教养投入对青少年心理适应影响的比较研究”(AFA15199)
作者简介:
参考文献:

1 McHale JP. When infants grow up in multiperson relationship systems. Infant Mental Health Journal, 2007, 28(4):370-392
2 McHale JP, Lauretti A, Talbot J, et al. Retrospect and prospect in the psychological study of co-parenting and family group process. In McHale JP, Grolnick WS. Retrospect and prospect in the psychological study of families. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc, 2002. 127-165
3 Feinberg ME. The internal structure and ecological context of coparenting:A framework for research and intervention. Parenting:Science and Practice, 2003, 3(2):95-131
4 McHale JP, Irace K. Coparenting in diverse family system. In JP McHale, KM Lindahl. Coparenting:A conceptual and clinical examination of family systems. Washington:American Psychological Association, 2011. 15-37
5 Feinberg ME, Kan ML, Hetherington EM. The longitudinal influence of coparenting conflict on parental negativity and adolescent maladjustment. Journal of Marriage and Family, 2007, 69(3):687-702
6 Baril ME, Crouter AC, McHale SM. Processes linking adolescent well-being, marital love, and coparenting. Journal of Family Psychology, 2007, 21(4):645-654
7 Teubert D, Pinquart M. The link between coparenting, parenting, and adolescent life satisfaction. Family Science, 2011, 2(4):221-229
8 Grych JH, Seid M, Fincham FD. Assessing marital conflict from the child's perspective:The children's perception of interparental conflict scale. Child Development, 1992, 63(3):558-572
9 Teubert D, Pinquart M. The Coparentinginventory for parents and adolescents(CI-PA):Reliability and validity. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 2011, 27(3):206-215
10 McHale JP, Neugebauer A. Preschoolers'characterizations of multiple family relationships during family doll play. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 1999, 28(2):256-268
11 McHale JP. Overt and covert coparenting processes in the family. Family Process, 1997, 36(2):183-201
12 Karreman A, van Tuijl C, van Aken, et al. Parenting, coparenting, and effortful control in preschoolers. Journal of Family Psychology, 2008, 22(1):30-40
13 McHale JP, Rao N, Krasnow AD. Constructing family climates:Chinese mothers'reports of their co-parenting behavior and preschoolers'adaptation. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 2000, 24(1):111-118
14 McHale JP. Assessing coparenting. In McHale JP, Lindahl KM. Coparenting:A conceptual and clinical examination of family systems. Washington:American Psychological Association, 2011.149-170
15 刘畅, 伍新春, 陈玲玲. 父母协同教养问卷中文版的修订及其信效度检验. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2014, 22(4):727-730
16 陈玲玲, 伍新春, 刘畅. 父母的婚姻满意度对父亲教养投入的影响:父母协同教养的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(3):268-276
17 Liu C, Wu XC. Dyadic effects of marital satisfaction on coparenting in Chinese families:Based on Actor-partner interdependence model. International Journal of Psychology, 2016. DOI:10.1002/ijop.12274
18 Stright AD, Bales SS. Co-parenting quality:Contributions of child and parent characteristics. Family Relations, 2003, 52 (3):232-240
19 McConnell MC, Kerig PK. Assessing coparenting in families of school-age children:Validation of the coparenting and family rating system. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 2002, 34(1):44-58
20 Goodman R. The strengths and difficulties questionnaire:A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 1997, 38:581-586

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【加入收藏
您是第访问者

《中国临床心理学杂志》编辑部
地址:湖南省长沙市中南大学湘雅二医院内, 410011
电 话:0731-85292472    电子邮件:cjcp_china@163.com
本系统由北京博渊星辰网络科技有限公司设计开发 技术支持电话:010-63361626