设为首页 | 加入收藏
网站首页 本刊简介 编委会 投稿指南 过刊浏览 广告合作 网上订购 下载专区 联系我们  
放逐对潜在接纳线索选择性注意的作用:社交焦虑的调节效应
作者:邓衍鹤  向睿洋  刘翔平 
单位:1. 北京师范大学心理学院  北京 100875 2. 应用实验心理北京市重点实验室  北京 100875 
关键词:放逐 选择性注意 社交焦虑 补偿缺失 
分类号:R395.1
出版年,卷(期):页码:2017,25(5):805-809
摘要:

目的:本研究旨在探讨社交焦虑在放逐对潜在接纳线索(积极面孔)选择性注意作用中的调节效应。方法:将被试随机分配到放逐或控制组,使用网络掷球任务进行放逐/控制操纵后,使用改进版点探测任务测量其对积极面孔在定向和脱离过程中的注意偏向。结果:在对积极面孔的注意脱离上,社交焦虑对放逐操纵的调节效应显著,简单效应分析表明,低社交焦虑被试遭遇放逐后从积极面孔脱离更慢,而高社交焦虑被试却脱离更快。结论:社交焦虑水平能够显著调节放逐后个体对积极面孔的注意脱离加工过程,对理解社交焦虑的起源与维持有重要启示。

Objective: This study investigated the moderating role of social anxiety in the effect of ostracism on selective attention to social signs representing potential social acceptance(i.e., smiling faces). Methods: Participants were randomly assigned to either ostracism or control condition manipulated by Cyber-ball game. A modified dot probe task allowing for a differentiation between processes of orienting and disengagement-two aspects of selective attention-was used to measure. Results: It was observed that individual differences in social anxiety moderated significantly the effects of ostracism on the disengaging index of smiling faces. Specifically, higher levels of social anxiety were associated with faster attentional disen-gagement from smiling faces in the ostracism condition, whereas lower level of social anxiety were associated with slower at-tentional disengagement. Conclusion: The current findings suggest that such compensatory deficits in the early-stage inter-personal perception have important implications for understanding the genesis and persistence of social anxiety.

基金项目:
国家社会科学基金一般项目(14BSH082);教育部人文社会科学一般项目(13YJA190009);北京幸福公益基金会积极心理学研究基金(京民基证字第0020344)
作者简介:
参考文献:

1 Baumeister RF, Leary MR. The need to belong:desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 1995, 117(3):497-529
2 Sheldon KM. Integrating behavioral-motive and experientialrequirement perspectives on psychological needs:A two process model. Psychological Review, 2011, 118(4):552-569
3 Bernstein MJ, Sacco DF, Brown CM, et al. A preference for genuine smiles following social exclusion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2010, 46(1):196-199
4 Carter-Sowell AR, Chen Z, Williams KD. Ostracism increases social susceptibility. Social Influence, 2008, 3(3):143-153
5 DeWall CN, Maner JK, Rouby DA. Social exclusion and early-stage interpersonal perception:selective attention to signs of acceptance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2009, 96(4):729-741
6 Xu M, Li Z, Zhang J, et al. Social exclusion influences attentional bias to social information. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2015, 18:199-208
7 Silvia PJ, Allan WD, Beauchamp DL, et al. Biased recognition of happy facial expressions in social anxiety. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 2006, 25:585-602
8 Taylor CT, Bomyea J, Amir N. Attentional bias away from positive social information mediates the link between social anxiety and anxiety vulnerability to a social stressor. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 2010, 24(4):403-408
9 Taylor CT, Bomyea J, Amir N. Malleability of attentional bias for positive emotional information and anxiety vulnerability. Emotion, 2011, 11(1):127-138
10 Yu H, Li S, Qian M, Yang P, et al. Time-course of attentional bias for positive social words in individuals with high and low social anxiety. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 2014, 42(04):479-490
11 Schofield CA, Inhoff AW, Coles ME. Time-course of attention biases in social phobia. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 2013, 27(7):661-669
12 Chen NT, Clarke PJ, MacLeod C, Guastella A. J. Biased attentional processing of positive stimuli in social anxiety disorder:An eye movement study. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 2012, 41(2):96-107
13 Tanaka H, Ikegami T. Fear of negative evaluation moderates effects of social exclusion on selective attention to social signs. Cognition and Emotion, 2015, 29(7):1306-1313
14 Pratto F. Consciousness and automatic evaluation. In PM Niedenthal, S Kitayama(Eds.), The heart's eye:Emotional influences in perception and attention. San Diego:Academic Press, 1994. 116-140
15 Koster EH, Crombez G, Verschuere B, De Houwer J. Attention to threat in anxiety-prone individuals:Mechanisms underlying attentional bias. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 2006, 30(5):635-643
16 Li P, Jia S, Feng T, et al. The influence of the diffusion of responsibility effect on outcome evaluations:Electrophysiological evidence from an ERP study. Neuroimage, 2010, 52(4):1727-1733
17 Mattick RP, Clarke JC. Development and validation of measures of social phobia scrutiny fear and social interaction anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1998, 36(4):455-470
18 叶冬梅, 钱铭怡, 刘兴华, 陈曦. 社会交往焦虑量表和社交恐惧量表的修订. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2007, 15(2):115-117
19 Williams KD, Cheung CK, Choi W. Cyberostracism:effects of being ignored over the Internet. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2000, 79(5):748-762
20 白露, 马慧, 黄宇霞, 罗跃嘉. 中国情绪图片系统的编制——在 46 名中国大学生中的试用. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2005, 19(11):719-722
21 Salemink E, van den Hout MA, Kindt M. Selective attention and threat:Quick orienting versus slow disengagement and two versions of the dot probe task. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 2007, 45(3):607-615
22 Williams KD, Jarvis B. Cyberball:A program for use in research on interpersonal ostracism and acceptance. Behavior Research Methods, 2006, 38(1):174-180
23 Fitzsimons GJ. Death to dichotomizing. Journal of Consumer Research, 2008, 35(1):5-8
24 Irwin JR, McClelland GH. Misleading heuristics and moderated multiple regression models. Journal of Marketing Research, 2001, 38(1):100-109
25 Koster EH, Crombez G, Verschuere B, De Houwer J. Selective attention to threat in the dot probe paradigm:Differentiating vigilance and difficulty to disengage. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 2004, 42(10):1183-1192
26 Gardner WL, Pickett CL, Jefferis V, Knowles M. On the outside looking in:Loneliness and social monitoring. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2005, 31 (11):1549-1560
27 Maner JK, DeWall CN, Baumeister RF, Schaller M. Does social exclusion motivate interpersonal reconnection? Resolving the ‘porcupine problem’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2007, 92(1):42-55
28 Downey G, Khouri H, Feldman SI. Early interpersonal trauma and later adjustment:The mediational role of rejection sensitivity. In D Cicchetti, SL Tot(Eds.), Developmental perspectives on trauma:Theory, research, and intervention. Rochester symposium on developmental psychology. Rochester, NY, USA:University of Rochester Press. xvii, 1997. 85-114
29 邓衍鹤, 向睿洋, 刘翔平. 社交焦虑个体被放逐后对潜在社交机会的反应偏差. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2017, 25(1):12-16
30 Maner JK, Kenrick DT. When adaptations go awry:functional and dysfunctional aspects of social anxiety. Social Issues and Policy Review, 2010, 4(1):111-142
31 Vorauer JD, Cameron JJ, Holmes JG, Pearce DG. Invisible overtures:fears of rejection and the signal amplification bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2003, 84(4):793-812
32 Mcneil DW, Randall CL, Lejuez CW, Sorrell JT. Mechanisms of Learning and Behavior Change in Social Anxiety Disorder. In SG Hofmann, PF DiBartolo(Eds.), Social Anxiety:Clinical, Developmental, and Social Perspectives(Third Edition). San Diego:Academic Press, 2014. 451-481

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【加入收藏
您是第访问者

《中国临床心理学杂志》编辑部
地址:湖南省长沙市中南大学湘雅二医院内, 410011
电 话:0731-85292472    电子邮件:cjcp_china@163.com
本系统由北京博渊星辰网络科技有限公司设计开发 技术支持电话:010-63361626