中国临床心理学杂志

不同自立水平大学生在积极和消极事件上的解释偏向

作者：方小平刘建平

单位：1. 江西科技师范大学教育学院南昌 330038 2. 江西师范大学心理学院南昌 330022

分类号：R395.6

出版年,卷(期):页码：2017,25(4):709-713

摘要：

目的：探讨不同自立水平大学生在积极和消极事件上的解释加工特点。方法：采用《青少年学生自立人格量表》《抑郁自评量表》《焦虑自评量表》和《积极和消极事件解释偏向测验》对高低自立水平两组学生在积极和消极事件上的解释偏向进行研究。结果：无论是在解释产生阶段还是在解释选择阶段，与高自立组相比，低自立组学生的积极解释较少，消极解释较多。结论：低自立学生对待事件有积极解释缺乏、消极化解释倾向。

Objective: To explore interpretative bias of the positive and negative events in undergraduates wtih different self-supporting levels. Methods: This study tried to find out interpretative bias with the high and low self-supporting groups of 72 undergraduates as subjects by Self-supporting Personality Scale for Adolescent Students, Self-rating Depression Scale, Self-rating Anxiety Scale, and Interpretation Questionnaire of Postive and Negative events. Results: Both on the interpretatively generative stage and on the interpretatively selective stage, the low self-supporting group of undergraduates scored higher on the negative interpretation and lower on the positive interpretation than the high self-supporting group. Conclusion: The low self-supporting undergraduates might lack positive interpretations and show a negative tendency of interpretation towards events compared with the high self-supporting undergraduates

基金项目：

国家社会科学基金（14BSH071）资助；江西省教育科学规划项目（16YB102）资助；江西科技师范大学博士科研启动基金资助

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 夏凌翔. 青少年学生自立人格的理论与实证研究. 重庆:西南大学博士学位论文, 2006
2 夏凌翔, 黄希庭. 青少年学生自立人格量表的建构. 心理学报, 2008, 40(5):593-603
3 Xia LX, Shi XL, Zhang Y, Hollon SD. Interpersonal selfsupport and attentional bias on negative and positive interpersonal information. International Journal of Psychology, 2013, 48(6):1246-1259
4 Xia LX, Li JC, Song Y, Hollon SD. Personal self-support traits and recognition of self-referent and other-referent information. Social Behavior and Personality, 2013, 41(10):1589-1596
5 夏凌翔, 耿文超. 个人自立与自我图式、他人图式. 心理学报, 2012, 44(4):478-488
6 夏凌翔, 张冉冉, 高尚. 低人际自立与消极情绪词注意偏向的关系. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 35(2):116-120
7 Xia LX, Liu J, Ding C, et al. The relation of self-supporting personality, enacted social support, and perceived social support. Personality and Individual Differences, 2012, 52:156-160
8 Bandura A. Self-efficacy:Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 1977, 84:191-215
9 方小平, 刘建平, 郑治国. 大学生自立人格、自我效能及自我控制的关系. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(4):500-505
10 夏凌翔, 黄希庭, 万黎, 杨红升. 大学生的自立人格与现实问题解决. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 1:53-57
11 Rozenman M, Amir N, Weersing VR. Performance-based interpretation bias in clinically anxious youths:Relationships with attention, anxiety, and negative cognition. Behavior Therapy, 2014, 45:594-605
12 Brosan L, Hoppitt L, Shelfer L, et al. Cognitive bias modification for attention and interpretation reduces trait and state anxiety in anxious patients referred to an out-patient service:Results from a pilot study. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 2011, 42:258-264
13 Mogg K, Bradbury KE, Bradley BP. Interpretation of ambiguous information in clinical depression. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 2006, 44:1411-1419
14 余红玉, 钱铭怡, 姚泥沙. 积极关注对社交焦虑者焦虑及认知偏差的影响. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2015, 3(6):1124-1128
15 Arntz A, Weertman A, Salet S. Interpretation bias in ClusterC and borderline personality disorders. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 2011, 49:472-481
16 宋文霞. 认知加工偏向下工读学校学生攻击性研究. 上海:华东师范大学博士学位论文, 2013
17 Rafienia P, Azadfallah P, Fathi-Ashtiani A, RasoulzadehTabatabaiei K. The role of extraversion, neuroticism and positive and negative mood in emotional information processing. Personality and Individual Differences, 2008, 44:392-402
18 朱金卫, 张艳琴, 黄会欣, 张锋. 焦虑诱发对歧义性信息解释偏向的影响-基于跨自我/他人相关情境的探讨. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2014, 22(4):589-593
19 Beck AT, Emery G, Greenberg RL. Anxiety disorders and phobias:a cognitive perspective. New York:Basic Books, 1985
20 Rapee RM, Heimberg RG. A cognitive-behavioral model of anxiety in social phobia. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1997, 35:741-756
21 Laposa JM, Cassin SE, Rector NA. Interpretation of positive social events in social phobia:An examination of cognitive correlates and diagnostic distinction. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 2010, 24:203-210
22 Alden LE, Taylor CT, Mellings TM, Laposa JM. Social anxiety and the interpretation of positive social events. Journal of Anxiety Disorder, 2008, 22:577-590
23 Stopa L, Clark DM. Social phobia and interpretation of social events. Behavior Research and Therapy, 2000, 38:273-283
24 Wilson JK, RaPee RM. The interpretation of negative social events in social phobia:changes during treatment and relationship to outcome. Behavior Research and Therapy, 2005, 43:373-389
25 王征宇, 迟玉芬. 抑郁自评量表(SDS). 上海精神医学, 1984, 2:71-72
26 陶明, 高静芳. 修订焦虑自评量表(SAS一 CR)的信度及效度. 中国神经精神疾病杂志, 1994, 20(5):301-303
27 Beard C, Amir N. Interpretation in social anxiety:When meaning precedes ambiguity. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 2009, 33 (4):406-415
28 Berna C, Lang TJ, Goodwin GM, Holmes EA. Developing a measure of interpretation bias for depressed mood:An ambiguous scenarios test. Personality and Individual Differences, 2011, 51:349-354
29 Huppert JD, Pasupuleti RV, Foa EB, Mathews A. Interpretation biases in social anxiety:Response generation, response selection, and self-appraisals. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 2007, 45:1505-1515
30 Wisco BE, Nolen-Hoeksema S. Interpretation bias and depressive symptoms:The role of self-relevance. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 2010, 48:1113-1122
31 许书萍. 高社交焦虑大学生的解释偏向. 上海:华东师范大学博士学位论文, 2010
32 Klein SB, Loftus J. The nature of self-referent encoding:The contribution of elaborative and organizational processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1988, 55:5-11
33 齐冰, 潘峰. 谁更灵活:内向者还是外向者. 河北大学学报 (哲学社会科学版), 2012, 6:109-112
34 夏凌翔, 黄希庭, 王登峰. 青少年学生自立人格的结构——基于中国人人格量表 (QZPS)的结果. 心理科学, 2008, 31(5):1035-1038

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】