中国临床心理学杂志

在准新婚个体中验证未来取向应对的序列模型

作者：苗淼王雅琦叶青可钦甘怡群

单位：1. 中国政法大学社会学院北京 100088 2. 北京大学心理与认知科学学院及行为与心理健康北京市重点实验室北京 100871

分类号：R395.6

出版年,卷(期):页码：2017,25(4):678-683

摘要：

目的：未来取向应对包含预先应对和预防应对，但二者之间的关系存在争议。本研究将在准新婚群体中，通过纵向设计来验证未来取向应对的序列模型，揭示预先应对与预防应对之间的序列关系。方法：采用方便取样，在120位一年内准备结婚的准新婚个体中，在间隔两个月的两个时间点上进行问卷调查，测量个体对于结婚的认知评估、未来取向应对，以及幸福感和压力知觉。结果：预先应对和预防应对均与幸福感显著正相关，与压力知觉显著负相关。模型比较和中介分析的结果验证了未来取向应对的序列模型。结论：本研究进一步澄清了预先应对和预防应对之间的关系，表明预防应对和预先应对是相互衔接、相互补充的序列阶段。

Objective: Future-oriented coping consists of preventive coping and proactive coping, but the relationship between these two remains controversial. The present study aimed to test the sequential model with longitudinal data in individuals facing marriage and explore the sequential relationship between proactive coping and preventive coping. Methods: Convenience sampling was conducted and data were collected from 120 individuals who planned to marry within a year. Self-report questionnaires were administered at two time-points with two months apart, measuring individuals' cognitive appraisal, future-oriented coping, well-being, and perceived pressure. Results: The results showed that both preventive and proactive coping were positively correlated with well-being and negatively correlated with perceived pressure. Moreover, structural equation modeling and mediation analyses confirmed the validity of the sequential model. Conclusion: The present results help to further clarify the connection and difference between preventive and proactive coping, demonstrating that they are sequential stages that are connected and complement each other.

基金项目：

国家自然科学基金面上项目（项目批准号：31571154）

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 Schwarzer R, Taubert S. Tenacious goal pursuits and striving toward personal growth:Proactive coping. In Beyond Coping:Meeting goals, Visions and Challenges, 2002. 19-35
2 Aspinwall LG, Taylor SE. A stitch in time:self-regulation and proactive coping. Psychological Bulletin, 1997, 121(3):417-436
3 Sohl SJ, Moyer A. Refining the conceptualization of a futureoriented self-regulatory behavior:Proactive coping. Personality and Individual Differences, 2009, 47(2):139-144
4 Gan Y, Yang M, Zhou Y, et al. The two-factor structure of future-oriented coping and its mediating role in student engagement. Personality and Individual Differences, 2007, 43 (4):851-863
5 甘怡群. 未来取向应对的双阶段序列模型及其时间透视机制. 心理科学进展, 2011, 19(11):1583-1587
6 文敏, 甘怡群, 蒋海飞, 等. 成就动机与学业倦怠、学业投入:未来取向应对的纵向中介作用. 北京大学学报:自然科学版, 2014, 50(2):388-396
7 Aspinwall LG. The psychology of future-oriented thinking:From achievement to proactive coping, adaptation, and aging. Motivation and Emotion, 2005, 29(4):203-235
8 Hu Y, Gan Y. Future-oriented coping and job hunting among college students. The Psychological Record, 2011, 61 (2):253-268
9 Greenglass E, Fiksenbaum L. Proactive coping, positive affect, and well-being. European Psychologist, 2009, 14(1):29-39
10 Thoolen B, de Ridder D, Bensing J, et al. Beyond good intentions:The role of proactive coping in achieving sustained behavioral change in the context of diabetes management. Psychology & Health, 2009, 24(3):237-254
11 Gan Y, Zheng W, Wen Y. The sequential model of futureoriented coping and adjustment to university life:The role of attitudes as further evidence. Psychological Record, 2014, 64 (1):13-20
12 Luo S, Klohnen EC. Assortative mating and marital quality in engaged individuals:a couple-centered approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2005, 88(2):304-326
13 Woszidlo A, Segrin C. Negative affectivity and educational attainment as predictors of engaged individuals' problem solving communication and marital quality. The Journal of Psychology, 2013, 147(1):49-73
14 张耀方, 方晓义. 城市新婚夫妻求助表达、伴侣支持应对和婚姻满意度的关系. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2011, 19(4):496-498
15 Williamson HC, Ju X, Bradbury TN, et al. Communication behavior and relationship among American and Chinese newlywed couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 2012, 26 (3):308-315
16 李晓敏, 方晓义, 琚晓燕, 等. 新婚夫妻冲突解决与日常沟通对婚姻质量的影响. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2016, 24(1):13-17
17 Neff LA, Geers AL. Optimistic expectations in early marriage:A resource or vulnerability for adaptive relationship functioning? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2013, 105(1):38-60
18 刘婉婷, 蚁金瑶, 钟明天, 朱熊兆. 压力知觉量表在不同性别大学生中的测量等值性. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2015, 23(5):944-946
19 Lazarus RS. Coping theory and research:Past, present, and future. Fifty Years of the Research and Theory of RS Lazarus:An Analysis of Historical and Perennial Issues, 1993. 366-388
20 Fritz MS, MacKinnon DP. Required sample size to detect the mediated effect. Psychological Science, 2007, 18(3):233-239
21 Boomsma A. Nonconvergence, improper solutions, and starting values in LISREL maximum likelihood estimation. Psychometrika, 1982, 50(2):229-242
22 Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R.A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 1983, 24(4):385-396
23 Campbell A, Converse PE, Rodgers WL. The quality of American life:Perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions (Vol. 3508). New York:Russell Sage, 1976
24 汪向东, 王希林, 马弘. 心理卫生评定量表手册. 增订版. 北京:中国心理卫生杂志社, 1999. 318-320
25 Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. Springer Publishing Company, 1984
26 Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis:Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling:A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1999, 6(1):1-55
27 Preacher KJ, Hayes AF. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 2008, 40(3):879-891
28 Witte K. Putting the fear back into fear appeals:The extended parallel process model. Communications Monographs, 1992, 59(4):329-349
29 Bode C, de Ridder DT, Kuijer RG, et al. Effects of an intervention promoting proactive coping competencies in middle and late adulthood. The Gerontologist, 2007, 47(1):42-51
30 Cole DA, Maxwell SE. Testing mediational models with longitudinal data:questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 2003, 112(4):558-577
31 Kraemer HC, Kiernan M, Essex M, et al. How and why criteria defining moderators and mediators differ between the Baron & Kenny and MacArthur approaches. Health Psychology, 2008, 2:S101-S108
32 Mitchell MA, Maxwell SE. A Comparison of the CrossSectional and Sequential Designs when Assessing Longitudinal Mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2013, 48 (3):301-339
33 齐亚静, 伍新春, 王晓丽. 中小学教师工作重塑与工作投入的交叉滞后分析. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2016, 24(5):935-938

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】