设为首页 | 加入收藏
网站首页 本刊简介 编委会 投稿指南 过刊浏览 广告合作 网上订购 下载专区 联系我们  
情绪创造力问卷在青少年群体中的信效度
作者:王国猛  燕良轼 
单位:湖南师范大学认知与人类行为湖南省重点实验室  心理学系  长沙 410081 
关键词:情绪创造力 青少年 信度 效度 
分类号:R395.1
出版年,卷(期):页码:2017,25(3):467-470
摘要:

目的:检验情绪创造力问卷(ECI)中文版在我国青少年群体中的信效度。方法:采用中文ECI对1912名青少年进行了调查,并以多伦多述情障碍问卷、情绪智力问卷、情绪调节自我效能感问卷为效标,检验效标效度。间隔4周后,随机抽取378名青少年进行重测。结果:探索性因素分析显示,情绪创造力问卷包括准备能力、创新能力、效率和诚实三个因素,共26个项目;验证性因素分析显示数据拟合良好;情绪创造力与情绪智力和情绪调节自我效能感显著正相关,与多伦多述情障碍显著负相关,效标效度良好;三个因素的Cronbachs'α系数为0.793~0.886,重测信度为0.802~0.871。结论:情绪创造力问卷在青少年中使用的各项信、效度指标均符合心理测量学要求。

Objective: To examine the reliability and validity of Emotional Creativity Inventory(ECI) in a sample of Chinese adolescents. Methods: 1912 adolescents were asked to complete the Chinese version of ECI, which were additionally asked to complete the Toronto Alexithymia Scale, Emotional Intelligence Scale and Regulatory Emotional Self-Efficacy Scale. 378 adolescents were chosen to complete the Chinese version of ECI after four weeks. Results: The EFA supported that ECI(26 items) consisted of three factors:Preparedness, Novelty, and Effectiveness/Authenticity, and the CFA confirmed the hypothesized three-factor model. ECI were positively correlated with Emotional Intelligence and Regulatory Emotional Self-Efficacy, while negatively correlated with Alexithymia, which reflected the good criterion validity. Three factors' internal consistency were 0.793 to 0.886 and the test-retest reliabilities ranged from 0.802 to 0.871. Conclusion: The Chinese version of the ECI had acceptable psychometric qualities, which can be applied to assess emotional creativity in Chinese adolescents.

基金项目:
湖南师范大学哲学社会科学青年学术骨干培养计划项目(12XGG13);湖南省哲学社会科学基金项目(16YBA264);国家社科基金项目(14BSH083)
作者简介:
参考文献:

1 Strongman KT. The psychology of emotion:From everyday life to theory. The Atrium, Sauthem Gate:John Wiley & Sons, 2003
2 Kaufman C. Expanding the mood-creativity equation. Creativity Research Journal, 2003, 15(2):131-135
3 Averill JR, Thomas-Knowles C. International review of studies of emotion. In K. T. Strongman(Ed.), Emotional creativity. London:Wiley, 1991. 269-299
4 Averill JR. Individual differences in emotional creativity:Structure and correlates. Journal of Personality, 1999b, 67 (2):331-371
5 Averill JR. A tale of two marks:emotional intelligence and emotional creativity compared. Psychological Inquiry, 2004, 15(3):228-233
6 Ivcevic Z, Bracket MA, Mayer JD. Emotional intelligence and emotional creativity. Journal of Personality, 2007, 75(2):199-236
7 Goretti S, Aitor A, Nekane B, et al. Adaptation and validation of the Basque version of the emotional creativity inventory in higher education. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 2016, 19(3):300-312
8 Nezhdyan FG, Abdi B. Factor structure of emotional creativity inventory(ECI-Averill, 1999) among Iranian undergraduate students in Tehran Universities. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2010, 5:1442-1446
9 Goretti S, Arantxa G, Aitor A, et al. A shortened Spanish version of the emotional creativity inventory(the ECI-S). Creativity Research Journal, 2015, 27(2):232-239
10 桑建瑜. 大学生情绪创造力问卷修订及情绪创造力与人格的关系. 暨南大学硕士学位论文, 2011
11 汤婧. 大学生情绪创造力及其与情绪智力、认知创造力的关系研究. 上海师范大学硕士学位论文, 2010
12 凌宇, 钟明天, 蚁金瑶, 等. 述情障碍特征对青少年应激与抑郁症状的调节作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2012, 20(2):168-171
13 刘艳, 邹泓. 中学生的情绪智力及其与社会适应的关系. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2010, 1:65-71
14 杨巧芳. 青少年孤独感与情绪智力、亲子依恋的关系研究. 西南大学硕士学位论文, 2013
15 窦凯, 聂衍刚, 王玉洁, 等. 青少年情绪调节自我效能感与主观幸福感:情绪调节方式的中介作用. 心理科学, 2013, 36(l):139-144

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【加入收藏
您是第访问者

《中国临床心理学杂志》编辑部
地址:湖南省长沙市中南大学湘雅二医院内, 410011
电 话:0731-85292472    电子邮件:cjcp_china@163.com
本系统由北京博渊星辰网络科技有限公司设计开发 技术支持电话:010-63361626