设为首页 | 加入收藏
网站首页 本刊简介 编委会 投稿指南 过刊浏览 广告合作 网上订购 下载专区 联系我们  
网瘾者对真人愤怒面孔的记忆优势效应
作者:雷玉菊  周宗奎  贺金波  张冬静  范翠英 
单位:1. 华中师范大学国家数字化学习工程技术研究中心  武汉 430079 2. 青少年网络心理与行为教育部重点实验室  武汉 430079 3. 华中师范大学心理学院  武汉 430079 
关键词:网络成瘾 真人面孔 卡通面孔 负性记忆优势 
分类号:R395.1
出版年,卷(期):页码:2017,25(3):412-416
摘要:

目的:采用学习-再认范式探讨网瘾者对真人面孔和卡通面孔记忆加工的差异,以期揭示网瘾者偏好网络社交的深层动机,为网络成瘾的干预提供有效理论支持。方法:采用Young《网络成瘾量表》从382名青少年中,筛选出网瘾者15名,非网瘾控制组被试18名,以学习-再认范式来比较两组被试对真人、卡通两种面孔的表情记忆差异。结果:①相比于控制组被试,网瘾被试对愤怒面孔的记忆成绩优于其他表情面孔,存在负性表情面孔记忆优势;②网瘾被试对愤怒面孔的记忆优势在真人面孔中更明显,对真人愤怒面孔的记忆成绩更好。结论:相较于控制组被试,网瘾被试对真人愤怒面孔表现出记忆优势效应,存在负性记忆偏向。

Objective: The present studyused the learning-recognition paradigm to investigate the differences of memory processing between real expressional faces and cartoon expressional faces in Internet addicts. Methods: Totally 382 adolescents were identified based on Young's Online Internet Addiction Test(IAT), from which 15 Internet addicts and 18 healthy control individuals(HCs) were selected. Results: ①Compared with HCs, Internet addicts had memory advantage of negative faces relative to the other emotional faces. ②More importantly, the memory advantage effect of negative faces in Internet addicts was more significant in real angry faces, showing better memory of real angry faces. Conclusion: Internet addicts have memory advantage effect of real angry faces relative to healthy subjects.

基金项目:
本研究得到国家社科基金重大攻关项目(11&ZD151)、北京师范大学中国基础教育质量监测协同创新中心自主课题(2016-04-003-BZK01)和华中师范大学优秀博士学位论文培育计划项目(2016YBZZ006)的资助
作者简介:
参考文献:

1 Amichai-Hamburger Y, Hayat Z. The impact of the Internet on the social lives of users:A representative sample from 13 countries. Computers in Human Behavior, 2011, 27(1):585-589
2 贺金波, 洪伟琦, 鲍远纯, 等. 网络成瘾者的大脑易于常人吗?心理科学进展, 2012, 20(12):2033-2041
3 Douglas AC, Mills JE, Niang M, et al. Internet addiction:Meta-synthesis of qualitative research for the decade 1996-2006. Computers in Human Behavior, 2008, 24(6):3027-3044
4 Weidman AC, Fernandez KC, Levinson CA, et al. Compensatory internet use among individuals higher in social anxiety and its implications for well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 2012, 53(3):191-195
5 Bane CMH, Cornish M, Erspamer N, Kampman L. Selfdisclosure through weblogs and perceptionsof online and "real-life" friendships among femalebloggers. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and SocialNetworking, 2010, 13(2):131-139
6 Marton?ik, Marcel, Lokša, Ján. Do World of Warcraft (MMORPG) players experience less loneliness and social anxiety in online world (virtual environment) than in real world(offline)? Computers in Human Behavior, 2016, 56:127-134
7 Okdie BM, Guadagno RE, Bernieri FJ, et al. Getting to know you:Face-to-face versus online interactions. Computers in Human Behavior, 2011, 27(1):153-159
8 Suler JR. To get what you need:Healthy andpathological Internet use. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 1999, 2(51):385-393
9 邓林园, 方晓义, 万晶晶, 等. 大学生心理需求及其满足与网络成瘾的关系. 心理科学, 2012, 35(1):123-128
10 贺金波, 陈昌润, 贺司琪, 周宗奎. 网络社交存在较低的社交焦虑水平吗?心理科学进展, 2014, 22(2):288-294
11 Lee BW, Stapinski LA. Seeking safety on the internet:Relationship between social anxiety and problematic internet use. Journal of Anxiety Disorder, 2011, 26(1):197-205
12 张明. 摆脱痛苦的心理依赖——成瘾心理. 北京:科学出版社, 2006. 190-196
13 赵仑, 高文彬. 网络成瘾患者早期面孔加工 N170. 航天医学与医学工程, 2007, 20(1):72-74
14 He J-b, Liu C-j, Guo Y-y, Zhao L. Deficits in early-stage face perception in excessive internet users. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Internet, 2011, 14(5):303-308
15 刘宏艳, 葛列众. 面部表情识别对社会交往能力的影响作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2014, 22(3):413-417
16 叶彬, 马佳瑶, 王璐, 等. 非临床社交焦虑者对面部表情的自动加工机制. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2016, 24(6):985-987, 991
17 Lundh LG, Öst LG. Recognition bias for critical faces in social phobics. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1996, 34 (10):787-794
18 Foa EB, Gilboa-Schechtman E, Amir N, et al. Memory bias in generalized social phobia:Remembering negative emotional expressions. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 2000, 14 (5):501-519
19 Coles ME, Heimberg RG. Recognition bias for critical faces in social phobia:A replication and extension. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 2005, 43:109-120
20 Staugaard SR. Threatening faces and social anxiety:A literature review. Clinical Psychology Review, 2010, 30:669-690
21 王智, 江琦, 张大均. 网络成瘾者的编码和再认实验研究. 心理发展与教育, 2008, 1(1):106-112
22 李翔宇, 郑希付. 病理性网络使用者对情绪信息的注意偏向研究. 心理发展与教育, 2010, 4(4):357-363
23 郑希付. 认知干扰还是情绪干扰:病理性互联网使用大学生的内隐心理特点比较. 心理学报, 2008, 40(8):920-926
24 郑希付. 网络成瘾者不同情绪状态下的认知加工特征. 心理学报, 2009, 41(7):630-638
25 Young KS. Internet Addiction Test(IAT). In. www.netaddiction.net,2009
26 Dong GH, Lin X, Zhou HL, et al. Cognitive flexibility in internet addicts:fMRI evidence from difficult-to-easy and easy-to-difficult switching situations. Addictive Behaviors, 2014, 39(3):677-683
27 叶冬梅, 钱铭怡, 刘兴华, 陈曦. 社会交往焦虑量表和社交恐惧量表的修订. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2007, 2(15):115-117
28 龚栩, 黄宇霞, 王妍, 罗跃嘉. 中国面孔表情图片系统的修订. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2011, 25(1):40-46
29 张锋, 马定松, 周艳艳. 不同动机网络使用者对网络使用线索的注意偏向. 应用心理学, 2007, 13(2):108-114
30 郑丽丹, 张锋, 马定松, 周艳艳. 情感性动机网络使用者对负性情绪线索的前注意偏向. 应用心理学, 2007, 13(3):204-210
31 Davis RA. A cognitive-behavioral model of pathological Internetuse. Computers in Human Behavior, 2001, 17(2):187-195

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【加入收藏
您是第访问者

《中国临床心理学杂志》编辑部
地址:湖南省长沙市中南大学湘雅二医院内, 410011
电 话:0731-85292472    电子邮件:cjcp_china@163.com
本系统由北京博渊星辰网络科技有限公司设计开发 技术支持电话:010-63361626