设为首页 | 加入收藏
网站首页 本刊简介 编委会 投稿指南 过刊浏览 广告合作 网上订购 下载专区 联系我们  
强迫症患者自知力水平与启动反应抑制功能关系的ERP研究
作者:雷辉  樊洁  周晟  董姣姣  朱熊兆 
单位:1. 湖南农业大学教育学院  长沙 410128 2. 中南大学湘雅二医院医学心理中心  长沙 410011 3. 中南大学医学心理学研究所  长沙 410011 
关键词:强迫症 自知力 反应抑制 事件相关电位 
分类号:R395.1
出版年,卷(期):页码:2017,25(3):400-405
摘要:

目的:探索强迫症患者自知力与反应抑制功能的关系。方法:记录42名强迫症患者(包括8名自知力不良的强迫症患者)和42名健康对照者在执行停止信号任务时诱发的ERPs。结果:与健康对照者相比,自知力不良和自知力良好组强迫症患者的抑制过程的反应时(Stop-signal reaction time,SSRT)更长(P<0.05),但是强迫症两个组别之间没有显著性差异。两组强迫症患者在抑制成功试次中的Stop-N2波幅值均显著大于健康对照者(P<0.05),两个强迫症组别之间无显著性差异。在抑制失败试次中,自知力良好的强迫症组的Stop-N2波幅值显著大于健康对照组(P<0.05)。结论:自知力不良的强迫症患者可能并不存在更严重的启动抑制功能的下降,强迫症的启动反应抑制功能下降可能独立于自知力水平。

Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the correlations between insight in obsessive-compulsive disorder and motor response inhibition. Methods: Event-related potentials(ERPs) were collected from 42 OCD patients(including 8 OCD patients with poor insight) and 42 healthy controls while they performed a stop signal task. Results: Stopsignal reaction time(SSRT) was longer in both good insight and poor insight OCD groups compared to control group(P<0.05). Larger Stop-N2 amplitudes were found in both of OCD groups in condition of inhibiting success(P<0.05). However, no significant differences were found between the two OCD groups. In condition of inhibiting failure. Conclusion: OCD patients with poor insight might have no more poorer performance on motor response inhibition, indicating that reduced motor response inhibition in OCD patients may be independent of their insight levels.

基金项目:
湖南农业大学人才引进科学基金项目(项目号:15YJ06);湖南省自然科学基金青年基金项目(项目号:2016JJ3067)
作者简介:
参考文献:

1 American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th ed. (DSM-IV). American Psychiatric Association, Arlington, 1994
2 Catapano F, Perris F, Fabrazzo M, Cioffi V, Giacco D, De Santis V, Maj M. Obsessive-compulsive disorder with poor insight:a three-year prospective study. Progress in NeuroPsychopharma cology & Biological Psychiatry, 2010, 34:323-330
3 Eisen JL, Rasmussen SA, Phillips KA, et al. Insight and treatment outcome in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Compr Psychiatry, 2001, 42:494-497
4 Foa EB, Kozak MJ, Goodman WK, et al. DSM-IV field trial:Obsessive-compulsive disorder. Am J Psychiatry, 1995, 152:90-96
5 Matsunaga H, Kiriike N, Matsui T, et al. Obsessive-compulsive disorder with poor insight. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 2002, 43:150-157
6 Ravi Kishore V, Samar R, Janardhan Reddy YC, et al. Clinical characteristics and treatment response in poor and good insight obsessive-compulsive disorder. Eur Psychiatry, 2004, 19:202-208
7 Bellino S, Patria L, Ziero S, et al. Clinical picture of obsessive-compulsive disorder with poor insight:a regression model. Psychiatry Res, 2005, 136:223-231
8 Türksoy N, Tükel R, Ozdemir O, et al. Comparison of clinical characteristics in good and poor insight obsessive-compulsive disorder. J Anxiety Disord, 2002, 16(4):413-423
9 Himle JA, Van Etten ML, Janeck AS, et al. Insight as a predictor of treatment outcome in behavioral group treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder. Cogn Ther Res, 2006, 30:661-666
10 Erzegovesi S, Cavallini MC, Cavedini P, et al. Clinical predictors of drug response in obsessive-compulsive disorder. J Clin Psychopharmacol, 2001, 21:488-492
11 Tumkaya S, Karadag F, Oguzhanoglu NK, et al. Schizophrenia with obsessive-compulsive disorder and obsessivecompulsive disorder with poor insight:a neuropsychological comparison. Psychiatry Res, 2009, 165:38-46
12 Kashyap H, Kumar JK, Kandavel T, et al. Neuropsychological correlates of insight in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 2012:1-9. DOI:10.1111/j.16 00-0447.2012.01 845.x
13 Schachar R, Logan GD, Robaey P, et al. Restraint and cancellation:Multiple inhibition deficits in attention deficit hyper-activity disorder. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 2007, 35:229-238
14 Falkenstein M, Hoorman J, Hohnsbein J. Inhibition-related ERP components Variation with modality, age, and time-ontask. Journal of Psychophysiology, 2002, 16:167-175
15 Nieuwenhuis S, Yeung N, van den Wildenberg W, et al. Electrophysiological correlates of anterior cingulate function in a go/no-go task:effects of response conflict and trial type frequency. Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2003, 3:17-26

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【加入收藏
您是第访问者

《中国临床心理学杂志》编辑部
地址:湖南省长沙市中南大学湘雅二医院内, 410011
电 话:0731-85292472    电子邮件:cjcp_china@163.com
本系统由北京博渊星辰网络科技有限公司设计开发 技术支持电话:010-63361626