中国临床心理学杂志

社会辅助型机器人:探索老年心理健康护理的新方法

作者：李思佳倪士光王学谦彭凯平

单位：1. 清华伯克利深圳学院深圳 518055 2. 清华大学深圳研究生院深圳 200062 3. 清华大学心理学系北京 100875

分类号：R395.5

出版年,卷(期):页码：2017,25(6):1191-1196

摘要：

全球和中国老龄化加剧，老年人的心理健康问题不容忽视，面对匮乏的人力和医疗资源，研究者们需要探寻新的突破。社会辅助型机器人（SAR，Socially Assistive Robot）是以社会性交互的方式为使用者提供身心帮助的机器人，机器人疗法已逐渐成为一种前沿的老年心理健康护理方法。未来研究将从SAR的用户友好程度、探讨老年人的真实心理问题等开展跨学科合作的机器人心理学研究，从而发展面向中国社会情境的研究范式。

The world population is aging with an inevitable decline in caregivers and medical resources to meet the healthcare need of increasing elderly people and those living with dementia or other mental problems, which has been well documented in recent decades. Psychological healthcare for elderly people has become a common problem worldwide, re-sulting in incalculable costs with regard to human suffering and societal burden. To alleviate this situation, researchers are working on new and efficient methods to facilitate the process of caregiving, one of which is technologies such as socially as-sistive robot(SAR). SAR has been empowered to expand mental healthcare services and change how people receive health-care services. This paper presents a systematic overview of the literatures, showing that SAR potentially enhances the wellbeing of the greying population and lighten the workload for family members or nurses. With research evidences, SAR war-rants concerted attention among researchers from diverse fields to develop the mechanism that robot may help aged people with psychological problems. Given these encouraging outcomes and positive findings, applications and friendly tools for the elderly people who are experiencing loneliness, disturbance, stress, or other psychological problems are endorsed by more and more researchers from multidisciplinary fields, although this field is still in an early developmental phase with limita-tions.

基金项目：

广东省自然科学基金青年项目（2015A030310215）、深圳市2017年科技计划项目基础研究（自由探索）（JCYJ20170307153032483）和深圳市教育科学"十三五"规划2016年招标重点课题（zdzz16002）的成果

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 Shibata T, Wada K. Robot therapy:A new approach for mental healthcare of the elderly-a mini-review. Gerontology, 2011, 57:378-386
2 Wang F, Zhao L, Zhao Z. China's family planning policies and their labor market consequences. Journal of Population Economics, 2017, 30:31-68
3 UN. World population aging report 2015. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, 2015
4 Schaffer CB. Enhancing human-animal relationships through veterinary medical instruction in animal-assisted therapy and animal-assisted activities. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 2008, 35:503-510
5 Banks MR, Banks WA. The effects of animal-assisted therapy on loneliness in an elderly population in long-term care facilities. Journals of Gerontology Series a-Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 2002, 57:M428-M432
6 Richeson NE. Effects of animal-assisted therapy on agitated behaviors and social interactions of older adults with dementia. American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Other Dementias, 2003, 18:353-358
7 Shibata T. Therapeutic seal robot as biofeedback medical device:Qualitative and quantitative evaluations of robot therapy in dementia care. Proceedings of the Ieee, 2012, 100:2527-2538
8 Bemelmans R, Gelderblom GJ, Jonker P, et al. Socially assistive robots in elderly care:A systematic review into effects and effectiveness. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2012, 13:114-U142
9 Mordoch E, Osterreicher A, Guse L, et al. Use of social commitment robots in the care of elderly people with dementia:A literature review. Maturitas, 2013, 74:14-20
10 Broekens J, Heerink M, Rosendal H. Assistive social robots in elderly care:A review. Gerontechnology, 2009, 8:94-103
11 Khosravi P, Ghapanchi AH. Investigating the effectiveness of technologies applied to assist seniors:A systematic literature review. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 2016, 85:17-26
12 Libin AV, Libin EV. Person-robot interactions from the robopsychologists'point of view:The robotic psychology and robotherapy approach. Proceedings of the Ieee, 2004, 92:1789-1803
13 Fong T, Nourbakhsh I, Dautenhahn K. A survey of socially interactive robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 2003, 42:143-166
14 Feil-Seifer D, Mataric MJ. Defining socially assistive robotics. In:Proceedings of the IEEE 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, Chicago, IL, 2005
15 Moyle W, Cooke M, Beattie E, et al. Exploring the effect of companion robots on emotional expression in older adults with dementia:A pilot randomized controlled trial. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 2013, 39:46-53
16 Lee H, Kim W, Han J, et al. The technical trend of the exoskeleton robot system for human power assistance. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 2012, 13:1491-1497
17 Graf B, Hans M, Schraft RD. Care-o-bot ii-development of a next generation robotic home assistant.Autonomous Robots, 2004, 16:193-205
18 Wada K, Shibata T, Saito T, et al. Effects of robot assisted activity to elderly people who stay at a health service facility for the aged. 2003
19 Kanamori M, Suzuki M, Oshiro H, et al. Pilot study on improvement of quality of life among elderly using a pet-type robot. 2003 Ieee International Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation, Vols I-Iii, Proceedings, 2003. 107-112
20 Higgins JPT GSe. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011
21 Edwards P, Clarke M, DiGuiseppi C, et al. Identification of randomized controlled trials in systematic reviews:Accuracy and reliability of screening records. Statistics in Medicine, 2002, 21:1635-1640
22 Kachouie R, Sedighadeli S, Khosla R, et al. Socially assistive robots in elderly care:A mixed-method systematic literature review. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 2014, 30:369-393
23 Fasola J, Mataric MJ. Using socially assistive human-robot interaction to motivate physical exercise for older adults. Proceedings of the Ieee, 2012, 100:2512-2526
24 Sasama R, Yamaguchi T, Yamada K. An experiment for motivating elderly people with robot guided interaction. Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction:Users Diversity, Pt 2, 2011, 6766:214-223
25 Kimura S, Musha T, Kaneko K, et al. Effectiveness of the creative art therapy by using diagnosis method of neuronal dysfunction(dimention). Neurobiology of Aging, 2002, 23:S389-S389
26 Okamura AM, Mataric MJ, Christensen HI. Medical and health-care robotics achievements and opportunities. Ieee Robotics & Automation Magazine, 2010, 17:26-37
27 Stafford RQ, Broadbent E, Jayawardena C, et al. Improved robot attitudes and emotions at a retirement home after meeting a robot. 2010 Ieee Ro-Man, 2010. 82-87
28 Gee FC, Browne WN, Kawamura K, et al. Uncanny valley revisited. 2005 IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication(RO-MAN), 2005, 151-157
29 Kim Y, Kwak SS, Kim M-s. Am i acceptable to you? Effect of a robot's verbal language forms on people's social distance from robots. Computers in Human Behavior, 2013, 29:1091-1101
30 Leite I, Pereira A, Martinho C, et al. Are emotional robots more fun to play with? 2008 17th Ieee International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Vols
1 and 2, 2008. 77-82
31 Tapus A, Mataric? M. User personality matching with handsoff robot for post-stroke rehabilitation therapy. Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Experimental Roboitcs(ISER), 2006,,Tapus A, Mataric? M. Socially assistive robots:The link between personality, empathy, physiological signals, and task performance. Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence(wwwaaaiorg), 2007
32 Fasola J, Mataric MJ, Ieee. Robot exercise instructor:A socially assistive robot system to monitor and encourage physical exercise for the elderly. 2010 Ieee Ro-Man, 2010. 416-421
33 Tapus A, Ieee. The role of the physical embodiment of a music therapist robot for individuals with cognitive impairments:Longitudinal study. 2009 Virtual Rehabilitation International Conference, 2009. 203-203
34 Khosla R, Chu M-T, Kachouie R, Yamada K, Yamaguchi T. Embodying care in matilda-an affective communication robot for the elderly in australia. the 2nd ACM SIGHIT International Health Informatics Symposium, 2012
35 Wada K, Ikeda Y, Inoue K, et al. Development and preliminary evaluation of a caregiver's manual for robot therapy using the therapeutic seal robot paro. 2010 Ieee Ro-Man, 2010. 533-538
36 Klamer T, Ben Allouch S. Acceptance and use of a social robot by elderly users in a domestic environment. 2010 4th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare(Pervasive Health 2010), 2010. 8
37 Tapus A, Tapus C, Mataric M. The role of physical embodiment of a therapist robot for individuals with cognitive impairments. IEEE International Symposium on Robot & Human I..., 2010, 10(10):103-107
38 Roger K, Guse L, Mordoch E, et al. Social commitment robots and dementia. Canadian Journal on Aging-Revue Canadienne Du Vieillissement, 2012, 31:87-94
39 Gelderblom GJ, Bemelmans R, Spierts N, et al. Development of paro interventions for dementia patients in dutch psychogeriatric care. Social Robotics, Icsr 2010, 2010, 6414:253-258
40 Giullian N, Ricks D, Atherton A, et al. Detailed requirements for robots in autism therapy. In:Ieee International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 2010
41 Calo CJ, Hunt-Bull N, Lewis L, et al. Ethical implications of using the paro robot with a focus on dementia patient care. Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence Human-Robot Interaction in Elder Care:Papers from the 2011 AAAI Workshop (WS-11-12), 2011. 20-24
42 Sharkey A, Sharkey N. Granny and the robots:Ethical issues in robot care for the elderly. Ethics and Information Technology, 2012, 14:27-40
43 Chang W-L, Sabanovic S, Huber L. Situated analysis of interactions between cognitively impaired older adults and the therapeutic robot paro. Social Robotics, Icsr 2013, 2013, 8239:371-380
44 Gorostiza JF, Salichs MA. End-user programming of a social robot by dialog. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 2011, 59:1102-1114
45 LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G. Deep learning. Nature, 2015, 521:436-444
46 Jayawardena C, Kuo I, Datta C, et al. Design, implementation and field tests of a socially assistive robot for the elderly:Healthbot version 2. IEEE Ras & Embs International Conference on Bio..., 2012, 49(4):1837-1842
47 Zeng ZH, Pantic M, Roisman GI, et al. A survey of affect recognition methods:Audio, visual, and spontaneous expressions. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell, 2009, 31:39-58
48 Breazeal C. Emotion and sociable humanoid robots. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 2003, 59:119-155
49 Zheng WW, Yang Q, Peng KP, et al. What's in the chinese babyface? Cultural differences in understanding the babyface. Frontiers in Psychology, 2016, 7:11

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】