中国临床心理学杂志

儿童亲密关系经历量表简明修订版在我国初中生中的信、效度检验

作者：邓衍鹤陈云祥岳艳春乎唤黄宇琛刘翔平

单位：1. 北京师范大学心理学院北京 100875 2. 应用实验心理北京市重点实验室北京 100875 3. 北京市建华实验学校北京 100039 4. 蚌埠学院蚌埠 233000

关键词：依恋类型效度信度初中生

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2017,25(6):1022-1026

摘要：

目的：修订儿童亲密关系经历量表简明版（Experiences in Close Relationships Scale-Short Revised Child version，ECR-SRC），检验其在中国初中生中的信度和效度。方法：通过3次抽样，初测394人对ECR-SRC中文版进行项目分析和探索性因素分析（EFA）；再测320人进行验证性因素分析（CFA），被试同时完成Hong氏逆反问卷、同伴关系量表、基本心理需求量表和青少年社交焦虑量表，以检验效标关联效度。6周后对初测样本随机抽取136人进行重测信度检验。结果：ECR-SRC中文版包括回避和焦虑2个维度，每个维度各6个条目。父-子依恋焦虑、依恋回避的α系数分别为0.81、0.87，重测组内相关系数分别为0.80、0.92；母-子依恋焦虑、依恋回避的α系数分别为0.82、0.87，重测组内相关系数分别为0.82、0.91。EFA和CFA结果支持了ECR-SRC中文版的二因素模型。父-子依恋焦虑、母-子依恋焦虑均与同伴关系适应、社交焦虑正相关，与归属需求负相关；父-子依恋回避、母-子依恋回避均与逆反、同伴关系适应和社交焦虑正相关，与胜任、自主以及归属需求均呈负相关。结论：ECR-SRC中文版在中国初中生群体中具有较好的信、效度，是测量其与父母依恋类型的适宜工具。

Objective:To revise the Experiences in Close Relationships Scale-Short Revised Child version(ECR-SRC), and examine its reliability and validity in Chinese middle school students. Methods:394 participants were selected to com-plete the Chinese version of ECR-SRC for item analysis and exploratory factor analysis(EFA); 320 participants were select-ed for confirmatory factor analysis(CFA) and criterion-related validity analysis. After 6 weeks, 136 participants were ran-domly selected for test-retest reliability. Results:Chinese version of ECR-SRC contained two dimensions(avoidance and anxiety), and every dimension had 6 items. Cronbach's α coefficients for the attachment to father on anxiety and avoidance dimension were 0.81, 0.87, and the test-retest reliability were 0.80, 0.92; and Cronbach's α coefficients for the attachment to mother on anxiety and avoidance dimension were 0.82, 0.87, and the test-retest reliability were 0.82, 0.91. The attach-ment anxiety to parents was positively correlated to peer relationship adjustment and social anxiety, and negatively correlat-ed to related need; and the attachment avoidance to parents was positively related to psychological reactance, peer relation-ship adjustment and social anxiety, and negatively related to competence need, autonomy need and related need. Conclusion:The Chinese version of ECR-SRC is satisfactorily valid and reliable in Chinese middle school students and is a conve-nient tool to measure the attachment style to their parents.

基金项目：

国家社会科学基金一般项目（14BSH082），教育部人文社会科学一般项目（13YJA190009），北京幸福公益基金会积极心理学研究基金（京民基证字第0020344）

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 Bowlby J. The making and breaking of affectional bonds. London:Tavistock Publications, 1979
2 Fraley RC, Shaver PR. Adult romantic attachment:theoretical developments, emerging controversies, and unanswered questions. Review of General Psychology, 2000, 4(2):132-154
3 Bartholomew K, Horowitz LM. Attachment styles among young adults:a test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 1991, 61(2):226-244
4 Brennan KA, Clark CL, Shaver PR."Self-report measurement of adult attachment:an integrative overview,"in Attachment Theory and Close Relationships, eds. J. A. Simpson and W. S. Rholes(New York, NY:Guilford Press), 1998. 438
5 Brenning, Soenens, Braet, Bosmans G. An adaptation of the experiences in close relationships scale-revised for use with children and adolescents. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2011, 28(8):1048-1072
6 Brenning K, Petegem SV, Vanhalst J, Soenens B. The psychometric qualities of a short version of the experiences in close relationships scale-revised child version. Personality & Individual Differences, 2014, 68(3):118-123
7 李同归, 加藤和生. 成人依恋的测量:亲密关系经历量表 (ECR)中文版. 心理学报, 2006, 38(3):399-406
8 Petegem SV, Vansteenkiste M, Beyers W. The jingle-jangle fallacy in adolescent autonomy in the family:in search of an underlying structure. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 2013, 42(7):994
9 Wei M, Shaffer PA, Young SK, Zakalik RA. Adult attachment, shame, depression, and loneliness:the mediation role of basic psychological needs satisfaction. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 2005, 52(4):591-601
10 朱海东. 青少年依恋与社交焦虑的关系研究. 西南大学, 2008
11 陈丽君. 青少年依恋的发展特点及其与学校适应的相关研究. 福建师范大学, 2005
12 Hong SM, Faedda S. Refinement of the hong psychological reactance scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1996, 56(1):173-182
13 曹钧, 董爱民, 张宁. 青少年逆反心理的相关因素研究. 精神医学杂志, 2008, 21(2):86-88
14 吴武典. 国中偏差行为学生学校生活适应之探讨. 教育心理学报, 1996. 29
15 Richard M Ryan, Edward L Deci. The darker and brighter sides of human existence:basic psychological needs as a unifying concept. Psychological Inquiry, 2000, 11(4):319-338
16 刘俊升, 林丽玲, 吕媛, 等. 基本心理需求量表中文版的信、效度初步检验. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2013, 27(10):791-795
17 La Greca AM, Lopez N. Social anxiety among adolescents:linkages with peer relations and friendships. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 1998, 26(2):83-94
18 朱海东, 刘云艳, 陈蔚. 中学生依恋情结与社交焦虑的关系研究. 教学与管理, 2010, 30:34-35
19 Ollendick TH, Benoit KE. A parent-child interactional mod el of social anxiety disorder in youth. Clinical Child & Family Psychology Review, 2011, 15(1):81-91
20 Weisman O, Aderka IM, Marom S, et al. Social rank and affiliation in social anxiety disorder. Behaviour Research & Therapy, 2011, 49(6-7):399-405
21 邓衍鹤, 向睿洋, 刘翔平. 社交焦虑个体被放逐后对潜在社交机会的反应偏差. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2017, 25(1):12-16
22 邓衍鹤, 向睿洋, 刘翔平. 放逐对潜在接纳线索选择性注意的作用:社交焦虑的调节效应. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2017, 25(5):805-809

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】