设为首页 | 加入收藏
网站首页 本刊简介 编委会 投稿指南 过刊浏览 广告合作 网上订购 下载专区 联系我们  
Revision of Urban Well-being Index Questionnaire
作者:HU Yuan-yan  CHEN Hong  CHEN Wei  WANG Yang  ZHANG Xiao-ming 
单位:1. Faculty of Psychology  Southwest University  Chongqing 400715  China 2. Laboratory of Emotion and Mental Health  Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences  Chongqing 402160  China 3. Key Laboratory of Cognition and Personality(Southwest University)  Ministry of Education  Chongqing 400715  China 4. School of Educational Science  Guizhou Normal University  Guiyang 550001  China 5. School of Educational Science  Jilin Normal University  Siping 136000  China 
关键词:Reliability Validity Chinese citizens Multidimensional Index of Well-being Psychometrics 
分类号:R395.1
出版年,卷(期):页码:2017,25(6):995-1000
摘要:

目的:修订城市幸福指数问卷(Urban Well-being Index Questionnaire,UWBIQ),考查其在中国城市公民群体中的信效度。方法:采用修订的城市幸福指数问卷(中文版)在中国多个城市对18-80岁的公民进行测试,获得有效数据2155份。结果:探索性因素分析的结果显示,修订的城市幸福指数问卷包含33个题目(总体幸福指数包含一个维度,领域幸福指数包含6个维度)。验证性因素分析的结果印证了探索性因素分析的结果。皮尔逊积差相关分析显示,修订的城市幸福指数问卷分别与生活满意度量表、繁盛人生量表呈中等强度的正相关,与罗森伯格自尊量表呈弱的正相关。修订的城市幸福指数问卷总的内部一致性系数为0.923,各维度的内部一致性系数在0.715~0.859之间。结论:修订的城市幸福指数问卷可被用于测量中国城市公民的幸福感。

Objective:The present study was to revise the Urban Well-being Index Questionnaire(UWBIQ) and evalu-ate its validity and reliability in Chinese citizens. Methods:A Chinese version of the Revised UWBIQ(UWBIQ-R) was ad-ministered to a large sample of Chinese citizens aged 18 to 80(n=2155). Results:Exploratory factor analysis of the UW-BIQ-R yielded seven distinct dimensions comprising a total of 33 items(one general well-being dimension and six domainspecific well-being dimensions). Confirmatory factor analyses subsequently replicated this factor structure. UWBIQ-R score were significantly and positively correlated with the scores from the Satisfaction with Life Scale and Rosenberg's Selfesteem Scale. The correlation between the UWBIQ-R and Rosenberg's Self-esteem Scale scores was significantly positive with small coefficients. The Cronbach's α coefficient for the total scale was 0.923, and the α coefficients for the dimensions ranged from 0.715 to 0.859. Conclusion:The results of this study provide preliminary evidence that the UWBIQ-R can be used to measure multiple dimensions of the well-being of Chinese citizens.

基金项目:
本研究得到国家社会科学基金一般项目(12XSH018),重庆市教委人文社会科学一般项目(14SKM10)和河南省教育厅高校重点联合项目(16A190005)的资助
作者简介:
参考文献:

1 Lyubomirsky S, Sheldon K M, Schkade D. Pursuing happiness:The architecture of sustainable change. Review of General Psychology, 2005, 9(2):111
2 Penedo F, Dahn J. Exercise and well-being:a review of mental and physical health benefits associated with physical activity. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 2005, 18(2):189-193
3 Uchida Y, Norasakkunkit V, Kitayama S. Cultural constructions of happiness:theory and emprical evidence. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2004, 5(3):223-239
4 Diener E, Suh E, Lucas R, et al. Subjective well-being:Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 1999, 125 (2):276
5 Diener E, Lucas R E, Oishi S. Subjective well-being:The science of happiness and life satisfaction. W:CR Snyder, SJ Lopez(red.), Handbook of Positive Psychology. Oxford:Oxford University Press, 2002:63-73
6 Busseri M, Sadava S. A review of the tripartite structure of subjective well-being:Implications for conceptualization, operationalization, analysis, and synthesis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2011, 15(3):290-314
7 Diener E, Emmons R, Larsen R, et al. The Satisfaction With Life Scale. Journal of Personality assessment, 1985, 49(1):71
8 Diener E, Wirtz D, Tov W, et al. New Well-being Measures:Short Scales to Assess Flourishing and Positive and Negative Feelings. Social Indicators Research, 2010, 97(2):143-156
9 Kuyken W, Orley J, Power M J, et al. The world health organization quality of life assessment(WHOQOL)-position paper from the world health organization. Social Science and Medicine, 1995, 41(10):1403-1409
10 Stones M, Kozma A, Hirdes J, et al. Short Happiness and Affect Research Protocol(SHARP). Social Indicators Research, 1996, 37(1):75-91
11 Xiong C, Xu Y. Reliability and Validity of the Stisfaction with Life Scale for Chinese Demos. China Journal of Health Psychology, 2009, 17(8):948-949
12 Tang X, Duan W, Wang Z, et al. Psychometric Evaluation of the Simplified Chinese Version of Flourishing Scale. Research on Social Work Practice, 2016, 26(5):
13 Lin C, Cheng T, Wang S. Measuring Subjective Well-Being in Taiwan. Social Indicators Research, 2014, 116(1):1-29
14 Nan H, Ni M, Lee P, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Subjective Happiness Scale. The 48th Annual Meeting of the Society for Epidemiologic Research. Boston; Oxford University Press, 2013
15 Xing Z. The development of the rivised subjective wellbeing scale for Chinese Citizens (SWBS-CC) and its nation wide norms. Psychological Science, 2008, 31(6):1484-1488
16 Lu L. The Relationship Between Subjective Well-Being and Psychosocial Variables in Taiwan. Journal of Social Psychology, 1995, 135(3):351
17 Lu L, Shih J. Personality and happiness:Is mental health a mediator?. Personality and Individual Differences, 1997, 22 (2):249-256
18 Lu L, Shih J. Sources of happiness:A qualitative approach. The Journal of Social Psychology, 1997, 137(2):181-187
19 Chen S, Cheung F, Bond M, et al. Going beyond self-esteem to predict life satisfaction:The Chinese case. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2006, 9(1):24-35
20 Shin D, Inoguchi T. Avowed happiness in Confucian Asia:Ascertaining its distribution, patterns, and sources. Social Indicators Research, 2009, 92(2):405-427
21 Lu L, Gilmour R, Kao S. Cultural values and happiness:An East-West dialogue. Journal of Social Psychology, 2001, 141 (4):477-493
22 Liu J, Li J, Huang X. Development of the Questionaire for Urban Well-being Index. Journal of Southwest University (Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 38(5):92-99
23 Mcdowell I. Measures of self-perceived well-being. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 2010, 69(1):69-79
24 Rosenberg M. The Self-Esteem Scale, SES. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 1999, (S.I.):318-320
25 Nunnally J, Bernstein I. Psychometric Theory, 3rd edn. New York:McGraw-Hill, 1994. 701
26 Loevinger J. Objective Tests As Instruments of Psychological Theory. Psychological Reports, 1957, 3(3):635-694
27 Kaiser H. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 1974, 39(1):31-36
28 Hau K, Wen Z, Chen Z. Structural Equation Model and Its Applications. Beijing:Educational Science Press, 2004. 161
29 Wu M. Structural Equation model:Operation and Application of AMOS. Chongqing:Chongqing University Press, 2009. 52-53

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【加入收藏
您是第访问者

《中国临床心理学杂志》编辑部
地址:湖南省长沙市中南大学湘雅二医院内, 410011
电 话:0731-85292472    电子邮件:cjcp_china@163.com
本系统由北京博渊星辰网络科技有限公司设计开发 技术支持电话:010-63361626