中国临床心理学杂志

农民工社会认同管理策略量表编制及信效度检验

作者：邓远平黄仁辉周海琳陈莉陈宛豫

单位：1. 集美大学教师教育学院厦门 361021 2. 宜春学院心理教育中心宜春 336600 3. 温州医学院应用心理系温州 325000 4. 福建师范大学教育学院福州 350100

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2018,26(1):30-34

摘要：

目的：编制农民工社会认同管理策略量表。方法：采用文献研究法、半结构访谈法确定量表维度并编制初始问卷，通过探索性因素分析、验证性因素分析和相关分析形成正式量表。结果：编制了由15个项目组成的农民工社会认同管理策略量表，包含个体流动、社会竞争、社会创造和妥协四个维度。分量表的重测信度介于0.656~0.749，内部一致性系数介于0.601~0.727。验证性因素分析结果（χ²=149.95，df=84，RMSEA=0.06，GFI=0.92，AGFI=0.88，CFI=0.93，NNFI=0.92）表明模型与数据拟合良好；农民工市民化意愿与个体流动有显著正相关，与社会创造和妥协有显著负相关，与社会竞争无相关。结论：农民工社会认同管理策略量表符合心理测量学的指标要求，可作为农民工社会认同管理策略的测量工具。

Objective:To develop migrant workers'social identity management strategies scale(MWSIMSS) and test its validity and reliability. Methods:According to a literature study and semi-structured interviews with 7 migrant workers, this study defined the construct of MWSIMSS and compiled the preliminary scale. Exploratory factor analysis and confirma-tory factor analysis and correlation analysis were used to determine the final scale. Results:MWSIMSS had 15 items and four dimentions:Individual mobility, Social competition, Social Creativity and Compromise; The test-retest reliabilities were 0.659~0.749 and the Cronbach α coefficients were 0.601~0.727 for the 4 subscales. The result of CFA(χ²=149.95, df=84, RMSEA=0.06, GFI=0.92, AGFI=0.88, CFI=0.93, NNFI=0.92) indicated that the model fitted the data with well con-struct validity, Migrant workers'Willingness to be Urban Citizens were positively correlated with individual mobility, nega-tively correlated with Social Creativity and Compromise, and not relevant to Social competition. Conclusion:MWSIMSS has good psychometric indexes, and can be used to measure Chinese migrant workers'social identity management strate-gies.

基金项目：

福建省社科规划项目"新常态下农民工社会认同威胁及其认同管理策略研究"（FJ2015B118）；国家社科基金项目"新生代农民工的婚恋模式与婚姻质量研究"（15BRK034）；福建省社科规划项目"文化心理学视域下两岸战后大陆赴台女作家创作史述研究"（FJ2015B113）

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 Cottrell CA, Neuberg SL. Different emotional reactions to different groups:A sociofunctional threat-based approach to ‘prejudice’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2005, 88:770-789
2 Riek BM, Mania EW, Gaertner SL. Intergroup threat and outgroup attitudes:A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2006, 10:336-353
3 Wildschut T, Insko CA, Pinter B. The perception of outgroup threat:Content and activation of the outgroup schema. In V. Yzerbyt, C. M. Judd, & O.Corneille(Eds.), The psychology of group perception. Philadelphia, PA:Psychology Press, 2004
4 Sherif M, Sherif CW. Social psychology. New York:Harper & Row, 1969
5 Branscombe NR, Ellemers N, Spears R, Doosje B. The context and content of social identity threats. In N Ellemers, R Spears, B Doosje(Eds.), Social identity:Context, commitment, content. Oxford:Blackwell, 1999. 35-58
6 Ellemers N, Spears R, Doosje B. Self and social identity. Annual Review of Psychology, 2002, 53:161-186
7 Kaiser CR, Vick SB, Major B. Prejudice expectations moderate preconscious attention to social identity threatening cues. Psychological Science, 2006, 17:332-338
8 Tajfel H, Turner JC. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In:S Worchel, W Austin(Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations. Chicago:Nelson-Hall, 1986. 7-24
9 Scheepers D. Turning social identity threat into challenge:Status stability and cardiovascular reactivity during intergroup competition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2009, 45:228-233
10 Van Knippenberg A. of identity management. Amsterdam, Swets & Zeitlinger, 1989
11 Wright SC, Taylor DM, Moghaddam FM. Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group:from acceptance to collective protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1990, 58(6):994-1003
12 Ellemers N. The influence of socio-structural variables on identity management strategies. In MHW Stroebe (Ed.). European Review of Social Psychology 1993, 4:27-57
13 Ellemers N, Spears R, Doosje B. Sticking together or falling apart:in-group identification as a psychological determinant of group commitment versus individual mobility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1997, 72(3):617-626
14 Blanz M, Mummendey A, Mielke R, Klink A. Responding to negative social identity:a taxonomy of identity management strategies. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1998, 28 (5):697
15 周晶. 外来务工人员的社会认同研究. 南京理工大学, 2007
16 何绍辉. 新生代农民工社会认同问题研究. 当代青年研究, 2009, 9:68-75
17 杨川丹. 新生代农民工的城市社会认同. 人民论坛, 2011, 17:162-163
18 方小教. 农民工社会认同问题辨析. 合肥师范学院学报, 2010, 1:51-55
19 钟华. 弱势群体成员的认同管理策略研究. 华中师范大学, 2008
20 Lalonde LR, Silverman RA. Behavioral preferences in response to social injustice:the effects of group permeability and social identity salience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1994, 66(1):78-85
21 Mark MM, Folger R. Responses to relative deprivation:a conceptual framework. In P Shaver(ed.), ca:sage(Vol. 5). Review of personality and social psychology. Beverly hills, Beverly Hills, CA:Sage, 1984. 192-218
22 Moghaddam FM, Taylor DM,Lalonde RN. Individualistic and collective integration strategies among Iranians in Canada. International Journal of Psychology, 1987, 22:301-313
23 Taylor DM, McKirnan DJ. A five-stage model of intergroup relations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 1984, 23:291-300
24 何友晖, 彭泅清, 赵志裕. 世道人心-对中国人心理的探索. 北京:北京大学出版社. 34
25 丁洁. 中国现代化转型中的农民心理问题研究. 南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2012, 1:101-106

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】