中国临床心理学杂志

共同冗思问卷在中学生中应用的效度和信度

作者：于静王佳宁于淼

单位：1. 哈尔滨师范大学教育科学学院哈尔滨 150025 2. 黑龙江省实验中学哈尔滨 150001

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2018,26(1):16-20

摘要：

目的：在中学生群体中引入共同冗思问卷，探讨该问卷在中国文化背景下的因素结构，并检验其效度和信度。方法：选取哈尔滨中学生644名（样本1）用于条目分析和探索性因素分析，另选取中学生300名（样本2），用于验证性因素分析、聚合效度、区分效度、组合信度以及内部一致性信度检验。在样本1中选取260人施测流调中心抑郁量表（CES-D）、强迫冥想和反思分量表、亲密袒露与交流分量表、状态焦虑量表（S-AI）检验效标效度。间隔5周后，在样本2中随机选取100人进行重测。结果：探索性因素分析得到理解性、相互鼓励谈论、关注消极感受三个因子，累积解释问卷总变异量的53.75%。验证性因素分析显示因素模型拟合良好（χ²/df=1.975，CFI=0.901，TLI=0.890，IFI=0.902，RMSEA=0.064，RMR=0.056）。效标效度检验显示，修订后的中文版CRQ与抑郁、强迫冥想、反思、亲密袒露与交流得分均呈显著正相关（r=0.18，0.18，0.17，0.25，均P<0.01）。问卷总的内部一致性系数为0.93，重测信度为0.78，三个因子的内部一致性系数和组合信度分别为0.91，0.85，0.73和0.91，0.85，0.73。结论：修订后的共同冗思问卷中文版在中学生样本中具有良好的信效度，可以作为测量和评估中国中学生与同性朋友共同冗思的工具。

Objective:To revise the Co-Rumination Questionnaire in middle school students and assess its validity and reliability. Methods:Totally 644 middle school students(sample 1) were recruited to complete the test version for item and exploratory factor analysis. Totally 300 middle school students(sample 2) were tested with formal version for further confir-matory factor analysis, convergent validity, discriminant validity, composite reliability and internal consistency reliability analysis. The criterion validity was tested with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale(CES-D-20), the brooding and reflection subscales of RRS, the intimate disclosure and exchange subscale of FQQ and the State Anxiety In-ventory(S-AI) by choosing 260 students from sample 1. Totally 100 students from sample 1 were retested for test-retest reli-ability with five weeks interval. Results:The explanatory factor analysis produced 3 factors including Rehashing, Encourag-ing Problem Talk, and Dwelling on Negative Affect. The accumulating explanatory rate of the 3 factors was 53.75%, and the results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that CRQ had a good construct validity(χ²/df=1.975, CFI=0.901, TLI=0.890, IFI=0.902, RMSEA=0.064, RMR=0.056). The CRQ scores were positively correlated with scores of CES-D, the brooding and reflection subscales of RRS, the intimate disclosure and exchange subscale of FQQ(r=0.18, 0.18, 0.17, 0.25, P<0.01 for all). Cronbach's α coefficient and the test-retest reliability were 0.93 and 0.78 for the total scale, the internal consistency reliability and the composite reliability were 0.91, 0.85, 0.73 and 0.91, 0.85, 0.73 for the 3 factors. Conclusion:The CoRumination Questionnaire is a reliable tool to assess the co-rumination with close same-sex friends in Chinese middle school students.

基金项目：

黑龙江省自然科学基金面上项目（项目编号：G2016004）

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 王茹婧, 李虹, 倪士光, 王新洋. 家庭功能对流动青少年睡眠质量的影响:一个条件过程模型. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2017, 25(4):704-708
2 Smith RL, Rose AJ. The "cost of caring" in youths'friendships:Considering associations among social perspective taking, co-rumination, and empathetic distress. Developmental Psychology, 2011, 47(6):1792
3 Waller EM, Rose AJ. Adjustment trade-offs of co-rumination in mother-adolescent relationships. Journal of Adolescence, 2000, 33(3):487-497
4 Rose AJ. Co-rumination in the friendships of girls and boys. Child Development, 2002, 73(6):1830-1843
5 Calmes CA, Roberts JE. Rumination in interpersonal relationships:Does co-rumination explain gender differences in emotional distress and relationship satisfaction among college students?. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 2008, 32 (4):577-590
6 Rose AJ, Carlson W, Waller EM. Prospective associations of co-rumination with friendship and emotional adjustment:considering the socioemotional trade-offs of co-rumination. Developmental Psychology, 2007, 43(4):1019
7 Starr LR. When support seeking backfires:Co-rumination, excessive reassurance seeking, and depressed mood in the daily lives of young adults. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 2015, 34(5):436-457
8 Rose AJ, Carlson W, Waller EM. Prospective associations of co-rumination with friendship and emotional adjustment:considering the socioemotional trade-offs of co-rumination. Developmental Psychology, 2007, 43(4):1019
9 Starr LR, Davila J. Clarifying co-rumination:Associations with internalizing symptoms and romantic involvement among adolescent girls. Journal of Adolescence, 2009, 32(1):19-37
10 Hankin BL, Stone L, Wright PA. Corumination, interpersonal stress generation, and internalizing symptoms:Accumulating effects and transactional influences in a multi-wave study of adolescents. Development and Psychopathology, 2010, 22(1):217-235
11 Stone LB, Hankin BL, Gibb BE, et al. Co-rumination predicts the onset of depressive disorders during adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 2011, 120(3):752
12 Rose AJ, Glick GC, Smith RL, et al. Co-rumination exacerbates stress generation among adolescents with depressive symptoms. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 2016. 1-11
13 Schwartz-Mette RA, Rose AJ. Co-rumination mediates contagion of internalizing symptoms within youths'friendships. Developmental Psychology, 2012, 48(5):1355
14 Byrd-Craven J, Geary DC, Rose AJ, et al. Co-ruminating increases stress hormone levels in women. Hormones and Behavior, 2008, 53(3):489-492
15 Byrd-Craven J, Granger DA, Auer BJ. Stress reactivity to co-rumination in young women's friendships:Cortisol, alpha-amylase, and negative affect focus. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2011, 28(4):469-487
16 Jose PE, Wilkins H, Spendelow JS. Does social anxiety predict rumination and co-rumination among adolescents?. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 2012, 41 (1):86-91
17 Dam A, Roelofs J, Muris P. Correlates of Co-rumination in Non-clinical Adolescents. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 2014, 23(3):521-526
18 Davidson CL, Grant DMM, Byrd-Craven J, et al. Psychometric properties of the co-rumination questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 2014, 70:171-175
19 Stone LB, Gibb BE. Brief report:Preliminary evidence that co-rumination fosters adolescents'depression risk by increasing rumination. Journal of adolescence, 2015, 38:1-4
20 Tavakol M, Dennick R. Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2011, 2:53
21 Spendelow JS, Simonds LM, Avery RE. The Relationship between Co-rumination and Internalizing Problems:A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 2017, 24(2):512-527
22 陈祉妍, 杨小冬, 李新影. 流调中心抑郁量表在我国青少年中的试用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2009, 17(4):443-445
23 Nolen-Hoeksema S. Responses to depression and their effects on the duration of depressive episodes. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1991, 100(4):569
24 杨娟, 凌宇, 肖晶, 等. 沉思反应量表中文版在高中生中初步运用结果分析. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2009, 17(1):27-28
25 Nolen-Hoeksema S. The role of rumination in depressive disorders and mixed anxiety/depressive symptoms. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 2000, 109(3):504
26 邹泓, 周晖, 周燕. 中学生友谊, 友谊质量与同伴接纳的关系. 北京师范大学学报:社会科学版, 1998, 1:43-50
27 付建斌. 状态-特质焦虑问卷构想效度的验证性因素分析. 中国心理卫生杂志, 1997, 11(4):216-217
28 Ma Y, Han S. Neural representation of self-concept in sighted and congenitally blind adults. Brain, 2011, 134(1):235-246
29 Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 1981:39-50

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】