设为首页 | 加入收藏
网站首页 本刊简介 编委会 投稿指南 过刊浏览 广告合作 网上订购 下载专区 联系我们  
儿童版父母教养方式问卷的修订
作者:王美芳  牛骅  赵晓 
单位:山东师范大学心理学院  济南 250014 
关键词:EMBU-C|儿童|信度|效度 
分类号:R395.1
出版年,卷(期):页码:2018,26(1):6-11
摘要:

目的:修订适合中国文化背景下使用的儿童版父母教养方式问卷(Egna Minnen Beträffende Uppfostran for Children,简称EMBU-C)。方法:使用EMBU-C对1461名小学生进行问卷调查。结果:探索性因素分析发现,中文版EMBU-C包括情感温暖、焦虑性教养、拒绝和过度保护四个维度;验证性因素分析表明四因素模型拟合良好。父母拒绝、焦虑性教养以及过度保护维度与儿童焦虑量表各分量表得分和焦虑总分均呈显著正相关;父母情感温暖得分与儿童焦虑量表各维度得分不具有相关性或具有低相关。EMBU-C的四个维度Cronbach's α系数在0.51-0.86之间,分半信度在0.57-0.89之间,重测信度在0.62-0.76之间。结论:经本研究修订后的中文版EMBU-C具有良好的信效度,为我国研究者今后开展父母教养方式的相关研究提供了更为简便、适用的测量工具。

Objective:This study aimed to revise a Chinese version of the "Egna Minnen Beträffende Uppfostran" for children(EMBU-C). Methods:The Chinese version of EMBU-C was administered to 1461 elementary school students. Results:Exploratory factor analysis revealed four distinct factors:emotional warmth, anxious rearing, rejection, and overpro-tection; confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the four-factor model. Parents'rejection, anxious rearing, and overprotec-tion had significantly positive correlations with children's anxiety symptoms, while parents'emotional warmth had no sig-nificant correlation or had only a slightly positive correlation with children's anxiety symptoms. The Cronbach's α of four dimensions were ranged from 0.51 to 0.86, the split-half reliabilities were ranged from 0.57 to 0.89, and the retest reliabili-ties were ranged from 0.62 to 0.76. Conclusion:The Chinese version of EMBU-C is a reliable and valid instrument for as-sessing parenting style in Chinese parents.

基金项目:
本研究受到国家自然科学基金项目资助(31571133)
作者简介:
参考文献:

1 Darling N, Steinberg L. Parenting style as context:An integrative model. Psychological Bulletin, 1993, 113(3):487-496
2 Dwairy M. Parental acceptance-rejection:a fourth crosscultural research on parenting and psychological adjustment of children. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 2010, 19 (1):30-35
3 王美芳, 王学思, 杨肖肖, 等. 父母拒绝与儿童青少年心理适应的关系:另一方父母接受的调节作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2017, 25(2):377-341
4 Thomasgard M, Shonkoff JP, Metz WP, et al. Parent-child relationship disorders. Part Ⅱ. The vulnerable child syndrome and its relation to parental overprotection. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics Jdbp, 1995, 16(4):251-256
5 Perris C, Jacobsson L, Linndström H, et al. Development of a new inventory for assessing memories of parental rearing behaviour. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 1980, 61(4):265-274
6 Castro J, Toro J, Van der Ende J, et al. Exploring the Feasibility of Assessing Perceived Parental Rearing Styles in Spanish Children With The EMBU. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 1993, 39(1):47-57
7 Markus MT, Lindhout IE, Boer F, et al. Factors of perceived parental rearing styles:the EMBU-C examined in a sample of Dutch primary school children. Personality and Individual Differences, 2003, 34(3):503-519
8 Muris P, Bosma H, Meesters C, et al. Perceived parental rearing behaviours:A confirmatory factor analytic study of the Dutch EMBU for children. Personality and Individual Differences, 1998, 24(3):439-442
9 Grüner K, Muris P, Merckelbach H. The relationship between anxious rearing behaviours and anxiety disorders symptomatology in normal children. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 1999, 30(1):27-35
10 Muris P, Meesters C, van Brakel A. Assessment of anxious rearing behaviors with a modified version of "Egna Minnen Beträffande Uppfostran" questionnaire for children. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 2003, 25(4):229-237
11 Arrindell WA, Akkerman A, Bagés N, et al. The shortEMBU in Australia, Spain, and Venezuela. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 2005, 21(1):56-66
12 岳冬梅, 李鸣杲, 金魁和, 等. 父母教养方式:EMBU 的初步修订及其在神经症患者的应用. 中国心理卫生杂志, 1993, 3:97-101
13 张茜洋, 冷露, 陈红君, 等. 家庭社会经济地位对流动儿童认知能力的影响:父母教养方式的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(2):153-162
14 张野, 卢笳. 初中生人际交往能力、学业成绩及其发展背景系统间的关系. 心理科学, 2012, 2:391-395
15 李董平, 张卫, 李丹黎, 等. 教养方式、气质对青少年攻击的影响:独特、差别与中介效应检验. 心理学报, 2012, 44 (2):211-225
16 蒋奖, 鲁峥嵘, 蒋苾菁, 等. 简式父母教养方式问卷中文版的初步修订. 心理发展与教育, 2010, 26(1):94-99
17 谢爱, 蔡太生, 刘家僖. 父母教养方式对超重/肥胖青少年暴食行为的影响:自尊的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2016, 24(5):837-840
18 何丹, 范翠英, 牛更枫, 等. 父母教养方式与青少年网络欺负:隐性自恋的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2016, 24 (1):41-44
19 吴鹏, 刘华山, 鲁路捷, 等. 青少年网络不道德行为与父母教养方式的关系——道德脱离、责任心、道德同一性的中介作用. 心理科学, 2013, 2:372-377
20 Roelofs J, Meesters C, ter Huurne M, et al. On the links between attachment style, parental rearing behaviors, and internalizing and externalizing problems in non-clinical children. Journal of Child and family Studies, 2006, 15(3):319-344
21 Muris P, van Brakel AML, Arntz A, et al. Behavioral inhibition as a risk factor for the development of childhood anxiety disorders:a longitudinal study. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 2011, 20(2):157-170
22 Zhao J, Xing X, Wang M. Psychometric properties of the Spence Children's Anxiety Scale(SCAS) in Mainland Chinese children and adolescents. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 2012, 26(7):728-736
23 Macdonald K. Warmth as a developmental construct:an evolutionary analysis. Child Development, 1992, 63:753-773
24 Greco LA, Morris TL. Paternal child-rearing style and child social anxiety:Investigation of child perceptions and actual father behavior. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 2002, 24:259-267

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【加入收藏
您是第访问者

《中国临床心理学杂志》编辑部
地址:湖南省长沙市中南大学湘雅二医院内, 410011
电 话:0731-85292472    电子邮件:cjcp_china@163.com
本系统由北京博渊星辰网络科技有限公司设计开发 技术支持电话:010-63361626