设为首页 | 加入收藏
网站首页 本刊简介 编委会 投稿指南 过刊浏览 广告合作 网上订购 下载专区 联系我们  
单维还是二维?幸福的积极情绪结构探讨
作者:陈世民  李旭  郑雪 
单位:1. 中国矿业大学公共管理学院  徐州 221116 2. 华南师范大学心理学院  广州 510631 3. 广东石油化工学院心理咨询中心  茂名 525000 
关键词:幸福|积极情绪|自我实现|需要满足|问卷编制 
分类号:R395.1
出版年,卷(期):页码:2017,25(1):92-96
摘要:

目的:探讨幸福的积极情绪是否存在二维结构,及二维结构是否优于单维结构。方法:对203名大学生进行开放式调查,对403名大学生进行初测,采用幸福的情绪体验问卷、积极体验消极体验量表、自我实现幸福问卷、个人成长分量表、需要满足问卷和生活满意度量表对716名大学生和381名成人进行正式施测。结果:幸福的情绪体验问卷包含自我实现体验、需要满足体验和消极情绪三个维度、共27题,大学生样本Cronbach α=0.899,成人样本Cronbach α=0.906;增加自我实现体验维度后,幸福的积极情绪二维结构对生活满意度的解释率增加了6.8%(F<0.001)。结论:幸福的积极情绪分为自我实现体验和需要满足体验两个维度;幸福的情绪体验问卷可作为测验幸福的主观体验的良好工具。

Objective: This study intended to explore if positive emotion of well-being has a dual-dimension or unidimension. Methods: A sample of 203 college students participated in an open-ended survey, 403 college students participated in preliminary survey, and two samples of 716 college students and 381 adults completed Emotional Experience of Well-being Questionnaire (EEWBQ), Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (SPANE), Questionnaire for Eudaimonic Well-Being, Personal Growth Subscale from Psychological Well-being Scale, Need Satisfaction Questionnaire, Satisfaction with Life Scale. Results: Emotional Experience of Well-being Questionnaire included three dimensions of eudaimonia-related experience, satisfaction-related experience and negative emotion with 27 items. The reliability for college students sample was Cronbach α=0.899, and that for adults sample was Cronbach α=0.906. The variance of the dual-dimension positive emotion of well-being to life satisfaction increased by 6.8% after adding eudaimonia-related experience dimension. Conclusion: Positive emotion dimension of well-being included two dimensions of eudemonia-related experience and satisfaction-related experience, and Emotional Experience of Well-being Questionnaire was a better measure of subjective experience of well-being.

基金项目:
中央高校基本科研业务费社会科学基金(2014WA05)
作者简介:
参考文献:

1 Diener E, et al. New well-being measures:Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 2010(97):143-156
2 Waterman AS, et al. The Questionnaire for Eudaimonic Well-Being:Psychometric properties, demographic comparisons, and evidence of validity. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 2010, 5(1):41-61
3 Tay L, Diener E. Needs and subjective well-being around the world. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2011, 101(2):354-365
4 Kenrick DT, et al. Renovating the pyramid of needs contemporary extensions built upon ancient foundations. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2010, 5(3):292-314
5 Nesse RM. Natural selection and the elusiveness of happiness. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences, 2004. 1333-1348
6 Nesse RM, Ellsworth PC. Evolution, emotions, and emotional disorders. American Psychologist, 2009, 64(2):129-139
7 Diener E. Subjective Well-Being. Psychological Bulletin, 1984, 95(3):542-575
8 Fredrickson BL. What good are positive emotions? Review of General Psychology, 1998, 2(3):300-319
9 Fredrickson BL. The role of positive emotions in positive psychology:The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 2001, 56(3):218-226
10 Fredrickson BL, Losada MF. Positive affect and the complex dynamics of human flourishing. American Psychologist, 2005, 60(7):678-686
11 Vittersø J, Dyrdal GM, Røysamb E. Utilities and capabilities:A psychological account of the two concepts and their relation to the idea of a good life, in the 2nd Workshop on Capabilities and Happiness 2005:Bicocca, Italy.
12 Vittersø J, Oelmann HI, Wang AL. Life satisfaction is not a balanced estimator of the good life:Evidence from reaction time measures and self-reported emotions. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2009, 10(1):1-17
13 Grinde B. Happiness in the Perspective of Evolutionary Psychology. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2002, 3:331-353
14 李宏利,张雷. 进化观点下的幸福研究. 心理科学进展,2010,18(7):1046-1051
15 Ryff CD. Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1989, 57(6):1069-1081
16 Deci EL, Ryan RM. The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits:Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 2000, 11(4):227-268
17 Bradburn NM. The structure of psychological well-being. Chicago:Aldine, 1969
18 Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect:the PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1988, 54(6):1063-1070
19 Diener E, Suh EM. Culture and Subjective Well-being. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press, 2000
20 崔春华,等. Ryff心理幸福感量表在河北师范大学生中的试用. 中国心理卫生杂志,2005,19(2):128-130
21 Diener, et al. The Satisfaction With Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1985, 49:71-75
22 郑雪,严标宾,邱林. 广州大学生主观幸福感研究. 心理学探新,2001,21(4):46-50
23 孔明,卞冉,张厚粲. 平行分析在探索性因素分析中的应用. 心理科学,2007,30(4):924-925

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【加入收藏
您是第访问者

《中国临床心理学杂志》编辑部
地址:湖南省长沙市中南大学湘雅二医院内, 410011
电 话:0731-85292472    电子邮件:cjcp_china@163.com
本系统由北京博渊星辰网络科技有限公司设计开发 技术支持电话:010-63361626