设为首页 | 加入收藏
网站首页 本刊简介 编委会 投稿指南 过刊浏览 广告合作 网上订购 下载专区 联系我们  
医疗情境中的年龄与自我他人决策差异
作者:杜秀芳  陈瑶瑶  任玉冰 
单位:山东师范大学心理学院  济南 250014 
关键词:医疗决策|自我他人决策|质量调整生命年 
分类号:R395.1
出版年,卷(期):页码:2017,25(1):36-39
摘要:

目的:探讨在医疗情境中,年轻人和老年人为不同角色决策时的差异。方法:采用2(年龄:年轻人、老年人)×3(生命质量权重:高、中、低)×3(决策角色:陌生人、亲人、自我)的混合实验设计。因变量为被试对两个质量调整生命年基本相等,但生命质量权重和生命长度不同的方案的选择倾向性。结果:与生命质量高长度短的选项相比,老年人比年轻人更倾向于选择生命质量低但长度长的选项;无论是年轻人还是老年人,为自己决策时更倾向于选择生命质量高长度短的选项,而为亲人和为陌生他人决策时都倾向于选择生命质量低但长度长的选项。结论:在医疗决策过程中决策者会权衡生命质量与生命长度,为自己和为他人决策时分别赋予生命质量和生命长度不同的价值。

Objective: To explore the discrepancies of age and self-other decision making in medical situation. Methods: A 2×3×3 experiment was designed. 117 youths and 85 old people took part in this study and finished a medical decision task. The dependent variable is the choice tendency between two options which have the same QALYs but different life quality. Results: When facing with the options that had the same QALYs, the aged tended to choose low quality and long length life options compared with the options that had high quality and short length life. When facing with the options that had the same QALYs, youths and the aged groups both tended to choose high quality life and short length options when making decisions for themselves, whereas for family and for unfamiliar others, they tended to choose low quality but the length of the long life options. Conclusion: In the medical situation, decision maker will make a trade-off between the life quality and life length. What's more, life quality and life length will be valued different while deciding for self and others in this medical situation.

基金项目:
山东省自然科学基金项目(ZR2015CM026)经费资助
作者简介:
参考文献:

1 Klarman, HE. The road to cost effectiveness analysis. The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly. Health and Society, 1982, 60(4):585-603
2 张力元,毕研玲,张宝山,等. 老年人行为决策:领域现状与挑战. 心理科学进展,2015,23(5):858-870
3 BakshiGS, ChenZ. Baby boom, population aging, and capital markets. The Journal of Business, 1994, 67(2):165-202
4 Kim S, Goldstein D, Hasher L, et al. Framing effects in younger and older adults. The Journals of Gerontology Series B:Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 2005, 60(4):215-218
5 Woodhead EL, Lynch EB, Edelstein BA. Decisional strategy determines whether frame influences treatment preferences for medical decisions. Psychology and Aging, 2011, 26(2):285-294
6 刘永芳,王鹏,庄锦英,等. 自我-他人决策差异:问题、研究与思考. 心理科学进展,2014,22(4):580-587
7 Trope Y, Liberman N. Construal level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 2010, 117(2):440-463
8 Beisswanger HA, Stone RE, Hupp MJ, et al. Risk taking in relationships:Differences in deciding for oneself versus for a friend. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 2003, 25(2):121-135
9 赵秋荻,刘永芳,段婧,等. 心理距离与决策者角色对风险决策的影响. 应用心理学,2013,19(1):26-33
10 Wray LD, Stone ER. The role of self-esteem and anxiety in decision making for self versus others in relationships. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2005, 18(2):125-144
11 张葳,刘永芳,孙庆洲,等. 异性交友决策任务上为不同心理距离他人决策的风险偏好. 心理学报,2014,46(10):1580-1590
12 Stone RE, Choi SY, Bruin BW, et al. I can take the risk, but you should be safe:Self-other differences in situations involving physical safety. Judgment and Decision Making, 2013, 8(3):250-267
13 彭嘉熙,张石磊,肖玮,等. 自我-他人医疗决策差异研究. 中国临床心理学杂志,2012,20(4):477-479
14 Garcia-Retamero R, Galesic M. Doc, what would you do if you were me? On self-other discrepancies in medical decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Applied, 2012, 18(18):38-51
15 Garcia-Retamero R, Galesic, M. On defensive decision making:how doctors make decisions for their patients. Health Expectations, 2014, 17(5):664-669

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【加入收藏
您是第访问者

《中国临床心理学杂志》编辑部
地址:湖南省长沙市中南大学湘雅二医院内, 410011
电 话:0731-85292472    电子邮件:cjcp_china@163.com
本系统由北京博渊星辰网络科技有限公司设计开发 技术支持电话:010-63361626