设为首页 | 加入收藏
网站首页 本刊简介 编委会 投稿指南 过刊浏览 广告合作 网上订购 下载专区 联系我们  
国企员工工作-家庭平衡对工作投入及满意度的影响:人格的调节作用
作者:于悦1 2  周明洁1  郭昫澄3  贺琼4  张建新1 
单位:1. 中国科学院心理研究所心理健康重点实验室  北京 100101 
2.
 中国科学院大学  北京 100049 
3.
 湖南师范大学公共管理学院  长沙 410006 
4.
 北京师范大学心理学院发展心理研究所  北京 100875 
关键词:工作-家庭平衡 工作满意度 工作投入 人格 
分类号:R395.6
出版年,卷(期):页码:2016,24(3):504-508
摘要:

目的:考察国企员工工作-家庭平衡与工作投入、工作满意度之间的关系,同时探索人格特质在其中起到的调节效应。方法:采用工作-家庭平衡量表(WFBS)、工作投入量表(UWES)、工作满意度量表(JSS)以及大五人格简版(BFI-10),对263名某大型国企员工进行问卷测查。结果:工作-家庭平衡正向预测工作满意度(β=0.4,P<0.01)和工作投入(β=0.5,P<0.01);同时,神经质和宜人性调节了工作-家庭平衡对工作满意度的影响(β=-0.11,P<0.05;β=-0.12,P<0.05);而在工作-家庭平衡对工作投入的预测中,只有尽责性起到了调节作用(β=-0.11,P<0.05)。结论:对于国企员工来说,工作-家庭平衡可以很好的预测其工作满意度以及工作投入,神经质、宜人性以及尽责性特质在其中起到了一定的调节作用。

Objective: To examine the effect of work-family balance (WFB) on work engagement and job satisfaction and explore the moderating effect of personality traits.Methods: 263 employees of a petrochemical enterprise were assessed with Work-Family Balance Scale (WFBS),Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES),Job Satisfaction Scale (JSS) and Big Five Inventory (BFI-10).Results: The hierarchical regression analysis showed that:① After controlling for gender,age,and marital and educational status,WFB positively predicted job satisfaction (β=0.4,P<0.01) and work engagement (β=0.5,P<0.01).② Neuroticism and Agreeableness moderated the effect of WFB on job satisfaction (β=-0.11,P<0.05;β=-0.12,P<0.05);Conscientiousness moderated the effect of WFB on work engagement (β=-0.11,P<0.05).Conclusion: For the employees,WFB has a positive effect on their happiness at work and their personality traits contribute as a moderating role.

基金项目:
北京市科技计划项目课程编号D(基金号:151100002315003)
作者简介:
参考文献:

1 Carlson DS, Grzywacz JG, Zivnuska S. Is work-family balance more than conflict and enrichment?. Human Relations, 2009, 20:1-28
2 Carlson DS, Kacmar KM, Zivnuska S, et al. Do the benefits of family-to-work transitions come at too great a cost?. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 2015, 20(2):161
3 Greenhaus JH, Powell GN. When work and family are allies:A theory of work-family enrichment. Academy of Management Review, 2006, 31(1):72-92
4 Greenhaus JH, Allen TD. Work-family balance:A review and extension of the literature. Handbook of Occupational Health Psychology, 2011:165-183
5 Grzywacz JG, Carlson DS. Conceptualizing work-family balance:Implications for practice and research. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 2007, 9(4):455-471
6 Bakker AB, Demerouti E, Oerlemans W, et al. Workaholism and daily recovery:A day reconstruction study of leisure activities. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2013, 34(1):87-107
7 Pawar BS. A Proposed Model of Organizational Behavior Aspects for Employee Performance and Well-Being. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 2013, 8(3):339-359
8 Carlson DS, Grzywacz JG, Ferguson M, et al. Health and turnover of working mothers after childbirth via the workfamily interface:An analysis across time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2011, 96(5):1045
9 Donaldson SI, Ko I. Positive organizational psychology, behavior, and scholarship:A review of the emerging literature and evidence base. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 2010, 5(3):177-191
10 Money K, Hillenbrand C, da Camara N. Putting positive psychology to work in organisations. Journal of General Management, 2009, 34(3):21
11 Kreiner GE, Hollensbe EC, Sheep ML. Balancing borders and bridges:Negotiating the work-home interface via boundary work tactics. Academy of Management Journal, 2009, 52(4):704-730
12 McCrae RR, John OP. An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Personality:Critical Concepts in Psychology, 1998, 60:295
13 Judge TA, Heller D, Mount MK. Five-factor model of personality and job satisfaction:a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2002, 87(3):530-541
14 Aryee S, Srinivas ES, Tan HH. Rhythms of life:Antecedents and outcomes of work-family balance in employed parents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2005, 90(1):132
15 Witt LA, Carlson DS. The work-family interface and job performance:Moderating effects of conscientiousness and perceived organizational support. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 2006, 11(4):343
16 Wayne JH, Musisca N, Fleeson W. Considering the role of personality in the work-family experience:Relationships of the big five to work-family conflict and facilitation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2004, 64(1):108-130
17 Kristof AL. Person-organization fit:An Integrative Review of Its Conceptualizations, Measurement, and Implications. Personnel Psychology, 1996, 49(1):1-49
18 Connolly JJ, Viswesvaran C. The role of affectivity in job satisfaction:A meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 2000, 29(2):265-281
19 Judge TA, Larsen RJ. Dispositional affect and job satisfaction:a review and theoretical extention. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2001, 86(1):67-98
20 申传刚. 边界弹性在双职工夫妻工作-家庭平衡中的作用机制研究. 华中师范大学博士学位论文, 2014
21 Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB. Utrecht work engagement scale:Preliminary manual. Occupational Health Psychology Unit, Utrecht University, Utrecht, 2003
22 张轶文, 甘怡群.中文版 Utrecht工作投入量表(UWES)的信效度检验. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2005, 13(3):268-270, 281
23 Macdonald S, Maclntyre P. The generic job satisfaction scale:Scale development and its correlates. Employee Assistance Quarterly, 1997, 13(2):1-16
24 郭昫澄. 双职工家庭工作-家庭界面特征对个人满意度及其家庭生活的影响. 华中师范大学博士学位论文, 2015
25 Rammstedt B, John OP. Measuring personality in one minute or less:A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. Journal of research in Personality, 2007, 41(1):203-212
26 McNall LA, Scott LD, Nicklin JM. Do positive affectivity and boundary preferences matter for work-family enrichment? A study of human service workers. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 2015, 20(1):93

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【加入收藏
您是第访问者

《中国临床心理学杂志》编辑部
地址:湖南省长沙市中南大学湘雅二医院内, 410011
电 话:0731-85292472    电子邮件:cjcp_china@163.com
本系统由北京博渊星辰网络科技有限公司设计开发 技术支持电话:010-63361626