中国临床心理学杂志

图形推理任务作答规则的多策略诊断

作者：刘铁川¹ 赵玉² 戴海琦³

单位：1. 赣南师范大学教育科学学院赣州 341000
2. 赣南医学院心理学系赣州 341000
3. 江西师范大学心理学院南昌 330022

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2016,24(3):459-463

摘要：

目的：使用多策略测量模型从新的视角诊断图形推理任务的规则掌握情况。方法：根据言语分析或视觉空间两种策略对瑞文高级推理测验题目所使用的规则进行编码，从题目参数、模型拟合、内部效度等多个角度比较了基于单策略假设的DINA模型和基于多策略假设的Mix-DINA和MS-DINA模型的诊断结果。结果：Mix-DINA模型对瑞文高级推理测验的拟合程度、题目区分度、内部效度最高；DINA模型最差；MS-DINA模型很少考虑多策略过程，高估了部分规则难度。结论：使用Mix-DINA模型分析图形推理测验更合理，不仅能够诊断个体的规则掌握状态，还可估计其策略使用倾向。

Objective: To diagnose rules used in solving figure reasoning tasks by utilizing new multiple strategy psychometric models.Methods: Items in Raven Advanced Progressive Matrices (RAPM) were coded from the perspective of Verbal-Analytic strategy and Visual-Spatial strategy,and different cognitive process were involved in correspond strategies.Three psychometric models were used to fit RAPM.The first model was DINA model which assumed only one strategy.The other two models were Mix-DINA and MS-DINA,which allowed multiple strategies.Item parameters,goodness of fit and internal validity were compared between these models.Results: Mix-DINA model fit RAPM best and provided the highest items' discriminable and internal validity.MS-DINA model rarely diagnose subjects' rules from multiple-strategy perspective and overestimate some rules' difficulty.Conclusion: Our data fit RAPM with Mix-DINA model best,which provides both individual's rule mastery state and strategy use tendency.

基金项目：

本研究得到了江西省教育科学规划重点课题（13ZD2L005）和江西省高校人文社会科学研究青年基金项目（XL1302）资助

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 Vakil E, Lifshitz-Zehavi H. Solving the Raven Progressive Matrices by adults with intellectual disability with/without Down syndrome:Different cognitive patterns as indicated by eye-movements. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 2012, 33(2):645-654
2 Carretti B, Belacchi C, Cornoldi C. Difficulties in working memory updating in individuals with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 2010, 54(4):337-345
3 Carpenter PA, Just MA, Shell P. What one intelligence test measures:A theoretical account of the processing in the Raven Progressive Matrices Test. Psychological Review, 1990, 97(3):404-431
4 Loesche P, Wiley J, Hasselhorn M. How knowing the rules affects solving the Raven Advanced Progressive Matrices Test. Intelligence, 2015, 48:58-75
5 DeShon RP, Chan D, Weissbein DA. Verbal overshadowing effects on Raven's advanced progressive matrices:Evidence for multidimensional performance determinants. Intelligence, 1995, 21(2):135-155
6 林崇德,沃建中,陈浩莺. 小学生图形推理策略发展特点的研究. 心理科学,2003,26(1):2-8
7 陈德枝,戴海琦,周骏. 同结构标准图形推理测验的编制与验证. 中国临床心理学杂志,2011,19(3):319-322
8 Primi R. Developing a fluid intelligence scale through a combination of Rasch modeling and cognitive psychology. Psychological Assessment, 2014, 26(3):774-788
9 Leighton JP, Chu M-W. First Among Equals:Hybridization of Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment and Evidence-Centered Game Design. International Journal of Testing, 2015. 1-17
10 Wang C, Shu Z, Shang Z, et al. Assessing Item-Level Fit for the DINA Model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 2015, 39(7):525-538
11 Huo Y, de la Torre J. Estimating a cognitive diagnostic model for multiple strategies via the EM algorithm. Applied Psychological Measurement, 2014, 38(6):464-485
12 刘铁川. Mix-DINA模型功能开发及其与 DINA、MS-DINA 模型的模拟与实证比较. 江西师范大学博士学位论文, 2012
13 Biemer PP. Latent Class Analysis of Survey Error. New Jersey:Wiley, 2011
14 Burnham KP, Anderson DR. Multimodel inference. Sociological Methods & Research, 2004, 33(2):261-304
15 Kim A-Y. Exploring ways to provide diagnostic feedback with an ESL placement test:Cognitive diagnostic assessment of L2 reading ability. Language Testing, 2015, 32(2):227-258
16 DiBello LV, Roussos LA, Stout W. A Review of Cognitively Diagnostic Assessment and a Summary of Psychometric Models. In Rao CR and Sinharay S, Handbook of statistics, Vol. 26:Psychometrics. Amsterdam:Elsevier Science, 2007. 979-1030
17 de la Torre J, Douglas J. Model Evaluation and Multiple Strategies in Cognitive Diagnosis:An Analysis of Fraction Subtraction Data. Psychometrika, 2008, 73(4):595-624
18 Gonthier C, Thomassin N. Strategy use fully mediates the relationship between working memory capacity and performance on Raven's matrices. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 2015, 144(5):916-924

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】