中国临床心理学杂志

注意相关认知错误量表的中文版修订

作者：程浩刘爱书

单位：哈尔滨师范大学哈尔滨 150025

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2016,24(5):874-877

摘要：

目的：在大学生群体中引入注意相关认知错误量表，探讨该量表在中国文化背景下的因素结构，并检验其信效度。方法：在大学生群体中发放问卷1100份，回收有效问卷964份，另用无聊倾向量表、正念注意觉知量表和心智游移问卷作为效标，3周后随机抽取117名学生进行重测。结果：探索性因素分析表明，抽取2个因素最为合适，特征根为4.808和1.004，累积方差贡献率为52.836%。验证性因素分析显示数据拟合良好（χ²/df=1.912，CFI=0.969，TLI=0.959，RMSEA=0.053，SRMR=0.040）；总量表及2个分量表内部一致性信度在0.689-0.866之间，重测信度在0.643-0.859之间；量表具有较好的效标关联效度。结论：注意相关认知错误量表中文版具有良好的信度和效度，可以用于大学生的注意相关认知错误测量。

Objective: To introduce and measure the validity and reliability of the Chinese version of Attention-related Cognitive Errors Scale(ARCES). Methods: 1100 university students were asked to complete the Chinese version of ARCES. At the same time, the Boredom Proneness Scale, Mindful Attention Awareness Scale, and Mind-Wandering Questionnaire were used as the criterion. 117 students were followed to complete the Chinese version of ARCES three weeks after the first investigation. Results: The exploratory factor analysis showed that ARCES consisted of two factor, accounting for 52.836% of the total variance. The confirmatory factor analysis identified a double factor model. CFI=0.969, TLI=0.959, RMSEA=0.053, SRMR=0.040. Reliability coefficients of the two dimensions and total score ranged from 0.689 to 0.866, and the test-retest reliability ranged from 0.643 to 0.859. The ARCES was of good criterion validity as well. Conclusion: The Chinese version of ARCES can be used as an effective instrument to assess the attention-related cognitive errors in Chinese university students.

基金项目：

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 Beck AT, Rush J, Shaw BF. Cognitive therapy of depression. New York:Guilford Press, 1979
2 Robertson IH. The absent mind attention and error. The Psychologist, 2003, 16(9):476-479
3 Larson GE, Alderton DL, Neideffer M, et al. Further evidence on dimensionality and correlates of the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire. British Journal of Psychology, 1997, 88(1):29-38
4 Giambra LM. A laboratory method for investigating influences on switching attention to task-unrelated imagery and thought. Consciousness and Cognition, 1995, 4(1):1-21
5 宋晓兰,唐孝威. 心智游移. 浙江:浙江大学出版社,2012. 60-61
6 Reason JT. Skill and error in everyday life. In M. Howe(Ed.), Adult learning. London:Wiley, 1977
7 Reason JT. Actions not as planned:The price of automatization. In G. Underwood & R. Stevens(Eds.), Aspects of consciousness. London:Academic Press, 1979. 67-89
8 Reason JT. Lapses of attention in everyday life. In R. Parasuraman & D. R. Davies(Eds.), Varieties of attention. New York:Academic Press, 1984
9 Broadbent DE, Cooper PF, itzGerald P, et al. The cognitive failures questionnaire(CFQ) and its correlates. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1982, 21(1):1-16
10 Cheyne JA, Carriere JSA, Smilek D. Absent-mindedness:Lapses of conscious awareness and everyday cognitive failures. Consciousness and Cognition, 2006, 15(3):578-592
11 刘勇,陈健芷,宋琳婷,等. 无聊倾向量表(BPS):中文版的结构、信度及效度. 中国临床心理学杂志,2014,22(1):74-77
12 陈思佚,崔红,周仁来,等. 正念注意觉知量表(MAAS)的修订及信效度检验. 中国临床心理学杂志,2012,20(2):148-151
13 鞠恩霞,张晏宁,罗扬眉. 心理游离问卷中文版的修订及其信效度研究. 中国临床心理学杂志,2016,24(1):109-111
14 Cheyne JA, Solman GJF, Carriere JSA, et al. Anatomy of an error:A bidirectional state model of task engagement/disengagement and attention-related errors. Cognition, 2009, 111(1):98-113
15 张灵聪,郑晖,林莹. 不同学业成绩初一学生注意与情绪稳定性的相关. 心理科学,2009,32(5):1050-1052

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】