中国临床心理学杂志

BIS-11中文版在三组青少年样本中的信效度验证

单位：1. 皖南医学院人文管理学院芜湖 241000
2. 无锡市精神卫生中心无锡 214151

关键词：BIS-11 青少年信度结构效度

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2016,24(5):869-873

摘要：

目的：验证BIS-11在不同青少年群体中的信度和六种因素模型的结构效度。方法：分别在正常青少年（n=406）、精神障碍青少年（n=258）、违法青少年（n=331）三组样本中进行信度分析；采用验证性因素分析在总样本及三组青少年样本中验证6种因素结构模型。结果：三组青少年样本BIS-11总量表及三个分量表（运动冲动性、认知冲动性、非计划性）内部一致性Crobach's α在0.67-0.89之间，三组样本之间量表得分差异有统计学意义（P<0.05），正常青少年的冲动性得分（76.10±15.81）最低，精神障碍青少年（83.28±18.01）次之，违法青少年（86.05±15.77）最高。验证性因素分析结果支持三因子相关模型、六因子相关模型和双因素模型（G-3模型、G-6模型），其中三因素模型和G-3模型模型拟合最为理想。结论：中文版BIS-11在不同青少年群体中具有较好的信度和结构效度，适应于青少年冲动性人格特质的测评与解释。

Objective: To test reliability and construct validity of the Chinese version of BIS-11 in normal adolescents, adolescents with mental disorder and delinquent juvenile. Methods: The internal consistency reliability of the BIS-11 was assessed by calculating the Cronbach's α coefficient in three separate adolescent samples:normal adolescents(n=406), adolescents with mental disorders(n=258), delinquent juvenile(n=331). Six models of the BIS-11 were evaluated using confirmatory factor analysis and compared in the total sample and three separate adolescent samples. Results: Cronbach's α coefficients of the total BIS-11 and its subscale scores in the three separate adolescent samples were all good(α=0.67-0.89). There were significant differences of BIS scores among three adolescent samples:normal adolescents had lowest scores and delinquent juvenile had highest scores. Fit indices supported three correlated factor model, six correlated factor model, and two bi-factor models(G-3 model and G-6 model). Among these models, fit indices of the three correlated factor model and G-3 model were excellent. Conclusion: The Chinese version of the BIS-11 has good reliability and construct validity which can be adapted to evaluation and interpretation of impulse personality traits for different adolescent populations.

基金项目：

国家社会科学基金（13BSH062）

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 李献云,费立鹏,徐东,等. Barratt冲动性量表中文修订版在社区和大学人群中应用的信效度. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2011,25(8):610-615
2 Von DL, Szobot CM, Kessler F, et al. Adaptation and construct validation of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale(BIS 11) to Brazilian Portuguese for use in adolescents. Revista Brasileira De Psiquiatria, 2007, 29(2):153-156
3 Ruiz MA, Skeem JL, Poythress NG, et al. Structure and Correlates of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale(BIS-11) in Offenders:Implications for Psychopathy and Externalizing Pathology. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 2010, 9(3):237-244
4 Reid RC, Cyders MA, Moghaddam JF, et al. Psychometric properties of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale in patients with gambling disorders, hypersexuality, and methamphetamine dependence. Addictive Behaviors, 2014, 39(11):1640-1645
5 Huang CY, Li CS, Fang SC, et al. The reliability of the Chinese version of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale version 11, in abstinent, opioid-dependent participants in Taiwan. Journal of the Chinese Medical Association:JCMA, 2013, 76(5):289-295
6 Hartmann AS, Rief W, Hilbert A. Psychometric properties of the German version of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale, Version 11(BIS-11) for adolescents. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 2011,112(2):353-368
7 Haden SC, Shiva A. A Comparison of Factor Structures of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale in a Mentally Ill Forensic Inpatient Sample. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 2009, 8(3):198-207
8 Fossati A, Barratt ES, Acquarini E, et al. Psychometric properties of an adolescent version of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11 for a sample of Italian high school students. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 2002, 95(2):621-635
9 Barratt ES. Factor analysis of some psychometric measures of impulsiveness and anxiety. Psychological Reports, 1965, 16(16):547-554
10 Patton JH, Stanford MS, Barratt ES. Factor structure of the Barratt impulsiveness scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1995, 51(6):768-774
11 Reise SP, Moore TM, Sabb FW, et al. The Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11:reassessment of its structure in a community sample. Psychological Assessment, 2013, 25(2):631-642
12 周亮,肖水源,何晓燕,等. BIS-11中文版的信度与效度检验. 中国临床心理学杂志,2006,14(4):343-342
13 杨会芹,姚树桥,朱熊兆,等. Barratt冲动量表中文版在209名大三学生中的试用. 中国心理卫生杂志,2007,4:223-225
14 李飞,苏林雁,耿耀国. Barratt冲动量表用于儿童的信度和效度初步研究. 中国临床心理学杂志,2006,14(2):115-117
15 Lu CF, Jia CX, Xu AQ, et al. Psychometric characteristics of Chinese version of Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11 in suicides and living controls of rural China. Omega, 2012, 66(3):215-229
16 Preuss UW, Rujescu D, Giegling I, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the German version of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale. Der Nervenarzt, 2008, 79(3):305-319
17 金凤仙,程灶火,刘新民,等. 违法青少年家庭环境、教养方式和人格特征的对照研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2016,24(1):53-55
18 李质彬,袁颖,杜江,等. 海洛因依赖者冲动特征及性别差异的比较分析. 中国临床心理学杂志,2011,19(6):782-784
19 Someya T, Sakado K, Seki T, et al. The Japanese version of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale, 11th version(BIS-11):its reliability and validity. Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences, 2001, 55(2):111-114
20 Vasconcelos AG, Teodoro MLM, Malloy-Diniz L, et al. Impulsivity components measured by the Brazilian version of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11). Psicologia Reflexão E Crítica, 2015, 28(1):96-105
21 顾红磊,温忠麟,方杰. 双因子模型:多维构念测量的新视角. 心理科学,2014,4:973-979

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】