Objective: To investigate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Guilt and Shame Proneness Scale(GASP) in undergraduate students sample. Methods: A sample of 463 college students were asked to complete the Chinese version of GASP. AQ, SES, and CBF-PI-B were chosen as the criterion-related indicators. 59 of the students were randomly selected to be retested after two weeks. Results: ① The Chinese version of GASP consisted of 16 items and four factors:guilt-negative-behavior-evaluation, guilt-repair, shame-negative-self-evaluation and shame-withdraw. ② Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the four-factor model of GASP provided a good fit with the data. ③ Coefficient Alphas were ranging from 0.58 to 0.66, the mean was 0.63; The test-retest reliabilities 2 weeks after were ranging from 0.62 to 0.75, the mean was 0.68. ④ The scores of two guilt proneness scales was significantly and negatively correlated with hostility, physical aggression scores, and positively correlated with self-esteem, agreeableness and conscientiousness scores. The scores of two shame proneness scales showed significant positive correlations with anger and neuroticism scores, and negative correlations with the Self-Esteem Scale total score. Conclusion: The Chinese version of GASP is a valid and reliable instrument to assess the guilt and shame proneness in Chinese university students.
|
1 Wolf ST, Cohen TR, Panter AT, et al. Shameproneness and guilt proneness:Toward the further understanding of reactions to public and private transgressions. Self & Identity, 2010, 9:337-362
2 Tracy JL, Robins RW. Putting the self into self-consciousemotions:A theoretical model. Psychological Inquiry, 2004, 15:103-125
3 杨玲,樊召峰. 中学生内疚与差异的对比研究. 中国心理卫生,2008,22(7):485-489
4 Tangney JP. Conceptual and methodological issues in the assessment of shame and guilt. Behavioral Research and Therapy, 1996, 34:741-754
5 Cohen TR, Wolf ST, Panter AT, et al. Introducing the GASP scale:A new measure of guilt and shame proneness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2011, 100(5):947-966
6 Tangney JP. Recent Advances in the Empirical Study of Shame and Guilt. American Behavioral Scientists, 1995, 38(8):1132-1145
7 Combs DJ, Campbell G, Jackson M, Smith RH, et al. Exploring the consequences of humiliating amoral transgressor. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 2010, 32:128-143
8 毛伟宾,李治亚,赵坤,等. 不同羞耻倾向个体情绪性自传体记忆的定向遗忘. 中国临床心理学杂志,2016,24(3):413-416
9 汪向东,王希林,马弘. 心理卫生评定量表手册. 北京:中国心理卫生杂志社出版,1999. 319-320
10 冀云,刘晓明,马艳杰. 未成年犯的攻击性及相关因素. 中国心理健康卫生杂志,2009,23(11):828-829
11 王孟成,戴晓阳,姚树桥. 中国大五人格问卷的初步编制Ⅲ:简式版的制定及信效度检验. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2011,19(4):454-457
12 Stuewig J, McCloskey L. The relation of child maltreatment to shame and guilt among adolescents:Psychological routes to depression and delinquency. Child Maltreatment, 2005, 10:324-336
13 Cohen TR. Moral emotions and unethical bargaining. The differential effects of empathy and perspective taking in deterring deceitful negotiation. Journal of Business Ethics, 2010, 94:569-579
14 Chapman M, Zahn-Waxler C, Cooperman G, et al. Empathy and responsibility in the motivation of children's helping. Developmental Psychology, 1987, 23:140-145
15 Schmitt N. Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychological Assessment, 1996, 8:350-353
16 Wallbott HG, Scherer KR. Cultural determinants in experiencing shame and guilt. In Tangney JP, Fischer KW. Selfconscious emotions:The psychology of shame,guilt, embarrassment, and pride. New York:Guilford Press, 1995. 465-487
17 Kitayama S, Markus HR, Matsumoto H, et al. Culture, self and emotion:A cultural perspective on "self-conscious" emotions. In Tangney JP, Fischer KW. Self-conscious emotions:The psychology of shame,guilt,embarrassment, and pride. New York:Guilford Press, 1995. 439-464
|