中国临床心理学杂志

中文版积极/消极注意偏向量表的初步修订

作者：吕遥迪¹ 2 郭江¹ 2 张雨青¹

单位：1. 中国科学院心理健康重点实验室中国科学院心理研究所北京 100101
2. 中国科学院大学北京 100039

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2016,24(5):861-864

摘要：

目的：修订中文版积极/消极注意偏向量表（The attention to Positive and Negative Information Scale，APNI），并检验其在地震后初中生人群的信效度。方法：用中文版APNI量表、积极/消极情绪量表（Positive Affectand Negative Affect Scale，PANAS）、儿童事件冲击量表（Children's Revised ImpactofEventScale，CRIES）、创伤后成长量表——儿童修订版（Children's Revised Positive-traumatic Growth Inventory，PTGI-C）对云南鲁甸地震灾区1199名初中生进行测试。结果：探索性因素分析得出两因素模型，删除载荷小于0.4的11个条目，解释总变异的42.9%。验证性因素分析验证了探索性因素分析的因子结构，拟合度较好（χ²/df=2.76，CFI=0.95，NFI=0.93，TLI=0.94，GFI=0.95，RMSEA=0.05）；所有项目的决断值均显著（P<0.001），各条目与量表总分相关在0.36~0.66之间。APNI量表总分和积极的注意偏向、消极的注意偏向的Cronbach's α系数依次为0.92、0.92、0.83。积极的注意偏向与积极情绪（r=0.51，P<0.01）、PTG（r=0.52，P<0.01）呈现显著正相关；消极的注意偏向与消极情绪（r=0.46，P<0.01）、PTSD（r=0.42，P<0.01）呈现显著正相关。结论：修订后的中文版APNI量表在地震受灾的初中生群体中具有良好信效度，适合在中国背景下使用。

Objective: To revise the Attention to Positive and Negative Information Scale(APNI) in Chinese subjects after the earthquake. Methods: Take the Chinese version of the Children's Revised Impact of Event Scale(CRIES), the Revised Posttraumatic Growth Inventory for Children(PTG-C), the Positive and Negative Affect Scale(PANAS) to make a survey among 1199 middle-school students from Ludian quake affected area. Results: According to the results of exploratory factor analysis,we deleted ten entry of the primary model and it was confirmed in the confirmatory analysis. The fit indices were χ²/df=2.76, CFI=0.95, NFI=0.93, TLI=0.94, GFI=0.95, RMSEA=0.05. The critical ratios of all the items were significant(P<0.001), and the correlations between each item and the total score ranged from 0.36 to 0.66. The Cronbach's α of the total scale, positive attentional bias and negative attentional bias subscale were 0.92, 0.92, 0.83 respectively. Positive attentional bias showed a significant positive correlation with positive affect(r=0.51,P<0.01) and PTG(r=0.52,P<0.01), and negative attentional bias showed a significant positive correlation with negative affect(r=0.46,P<0.01) and PTSD(r=0.42,P<0.01). Conclusion: The Chinese Revision of Attention to Positive and Negative Information Scale has good reliability and validity, hence they are suitable for measurement in Chinese.

基金项目：

中国心理学会学会能力专项：突发自然灾害后急性应激反应（ASD）对创伤后应激障碍（PTSD）的预测

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 Bar-Haim Y, Lamy D, Pergamin L, et al. Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals:A meta-analytic study. Psychological Bulletin, 2007, 133(1):1-24
2 Noguchi K, CL Gohm, DJ Dalsky. Cognitive tendencies of focusing on positive and negative information. Journal of Research in Personality, 2006, 40(6):891-910
3 Segerstrom SC, Stanton AL, Alden LE, et al. A multidimensional structure for repetitive thought:what's on your mind, and how, and how much? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2003, 85(5):909
4 Rusting CL. Personality, mood, and cognitive processing of emotional information:three conceptual frameworks. Psychological Bulletin, 1998, 124(2):165
5 Chan MW, Ho SM, Tedeschi RG, et al. The valence of attentional bias and cancer-related rumination in posttraumatic stress and posttraumatic growth among women with breast cancer. Psychooncology, 2011, 20(5):544-552
6 黄丽,杨廷忠. 正性负性情绪量表的中国人群适用性研究. 中国心理卫生杂志,2003,17(1):54-56
7 汪智艳,汪智艳,高隽,等. 修订版儿童事件影响量表在地震灾区初中学生中的信效度. 中国心理卫生杂志,2010, 24(6):463-466
8 Kilmer RP, Gil-Rivas V, Tedeschi RG, et al. Use of the revised Posttraumatic Growth Inventory for Children. J Trauma Stress, 2009,22(3):248-253
9 Cryder CH, Kilmer RP, Tedeschi RG, et al. An exploratory study of posttraumatic growth in children following a natural disaster. Am J Orthopsychiatry, 2006,76(1):65-69
10 Ho SM, KW Chu, J Yiu. The relationship between explanatory style and posttraumatic growth after bereavement in a non-clinical sample. Death Stud, 2008, 32(5):461-478
11 Ehlers A, Clark DM. A cognitive model of posttraumatic stress disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 2000, 38(4):319-345
12 Bryant RA, Guthrie RM. Maladaptive self-appraisals before trauma exposure predict posttraumatic stress disorder. J Consult Clin Psychol, 2007, 75(5):812-815
13 Cann A, Calhoun LG, Tedeschi RG, et al. Assessing posttraumatic cognitive processes:the Event Related Rumination Inventory. Anxiety Stress Coping, 2011, 24(2):137-156
14 苟娜. PTSD初中生注意偏向的实验研究. 重庆:西南大学,2009
15 王婷. 震后受灾老年人对恐惧刺激的注意偏向特点. 北京:中国科学院研究生院,2012
16 Mathews A, MacLeod C. Induced processing biases have causal effects on anxiety. Cognition & Emotion, 2002, 16(3):331-354
17 Elsesser K, G Sartory, A Tackenberg. Initial symptoms and reactions to trauma-related stimuli and the development of posttraumatic stress disorder. Depression and Anxiety, 2005, 21(2):61-70
18 Ho SM, et al. Relationships between explanatory style, posttraumatic growth and posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms among Chinese breast cancer patients. Psychol Health, 2011, 26(3):269-285
19 董超群. 自我表露对意外创伤者创伤后成长的干预效果及作用机制研究. 上海:第二军医大学,2013

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】