设为首页 | 加入收藏
网站首页 本刊简介 编委会 投稿指南 过刊浏览 广告合作 网上订购 下载专区 联系我们  
家庭照顾负担访谈量表在住院癌症患者家属中的应用
作者:于文军1  胡纪泽2 
单位:1. 井冈山大学心理健康教育与咨询中心  吉安 343009 
2.
 深圳大学心理学系  深圳 518060 
关键词:癌症 患者家属 照顾负担 信度 效度 
分类号:R395.1
出版年,卷(期):页码:2016,24(2):274-276
摘要:

目的:检验家庭照顾负担访谈量表(FBIS)在住院癌症患者家属中的信效度。方法:在某市中心医院住院部共采集356名癌症患者家属,用FBIS、家庭功能评定量表(FAD)、症状自评量表(SCL-90)进行施测,间隔4周后抽取60名被试重新施测FBIS。结果:FBIS全量表的α系数为0.87,5个分量表α系数在0.75~0.87之间;全量表的重测信度为0.88,各分量表的重测信度在0.81~0.92之间;全量表的条目间平均相关系数为0.53,5个分量表的条目间平均相关系数在0.43~0.62之间。FBIS总分与5个分量表得分的相关系数在0.62~0.89之间;各分量表得分之间的相关系数在0.34~0.60之间。验证性因素分析各拟合指数为:χ2/df=1.771,GFI=0.929,IFI=0.936,TLI=0.909,CFI=0.925,RMSEA=0.047,均符合测量学要求,支持该量表5因素模型的理论构想。FBIS全量表及5个分量表得分与SCL-90得分正相关(r=0.32~0.59,都P<0.01),与FAD得分正相关(r=0.23~0.41,都P<0.01)。结论:家庭照顾负担访谈量表在癌症患者家属中具有良好的信效度,是评估我国癌症患者家属照顾负担水平的可靠工具。

Objective:To assess the reliability and validity of the Family Burden Interview Scale in Families of hospital-ized cancer patients. Methods:In a city center hospital, 356 families of cancer patients were recruited and assessed with FBIS, Family Assessment(FAD), Symptom Checklist(SCL-90). After an interval of four weeks, 60 subjects were re-tested with FBIS. Results:The α coefficient for FBIS full scale was 0.87, and the α coefficient for 5 subscales ranged from 0.75 to 0.87; full-scale test-retest reliability was 0.88, test-retest reliability of each subscale ranged from 0.81 to 0.92; full Scale entries inter average correlation coefficient was 0.53, and 5 entries subscales average correlation coefficients ranged from 0.43 to 0.62. Correlation coefficients between FBIS total score and five subscale were 0.62~0.89; correlation coefficients be-tween 5 subscale scores ranged from 0.34 to 0.60. Confirmatory factor analysis of each fitting Index:χ2/df=1.771, GFI=0.929, IFI=0.936, TLI=0.909, CFI=0.925, RMSEA=0.047 supported the original FBIS structural hypothesis of the five fac-tors model. The correlation coefficients between the FBIS total score and five subscales scores were all positively correlated with the SCL-90 scores(r=0.32~0.59, P<0.01), and FAD scores(r=0.23~0.41, both P<0.01). Conclusion:The Family Bur-den Interview Scale has good reliability and validity in Families of hospitalized cancer patients in China.

基金项目:
吉安市社会科学“十二五”(2015年)规划项目(15GH117)
作者简介:
参考文献:

1 于文军,胡纪泽,习萍等.精神分裂症患者家属心理健康研究Ⅱ:照顾负担影响因素,中国临床心理学杂志,2011,19(4):518-520
2 Bulger MW,Wandersman A,Goldman CR.Burdens and gratifications of caregiving:Appraisal of parental care of adults with schizophrenia.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry,1993,63:255-265
3 Schene AH,Tessler RC,Gamache GM.Instruments measuring family or caregiver burden in severe mental illness.Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology,1994,29(5):228-240
4 Chien WT,Norman I.The validity and reliability of a Chinese version of the Family Burden Interview Schedule.Nursing Research,2004,53:314-322
5 Chien WT,Chan SW,Morrissey J.The perceived burden among Chinese family caregivers of people with schizophrenia.Journal of Clinical Nursing,2007,16(6):1151-1161
6 孙玉成,于文军,徐文明,等.精神分裂症患者家属心理健康影响因素模型的构建.中国临床心理学杂志,2012,20(1):61-64
7 He HB,Zhou YL,Sun B,et al.Brief Chinese version of the Family Experience Interview Schedule to assess caregiver burden of family members of individuals with mental disorders.Shanghai Archives of Psychiatry,2015,27(1):55-61
8 肖宁,肖水源,彭立辉,等.疾病认知干预对减轻脑肿瘤患者及其家属焦虑抑郁情绪的作用.中国临床心理学杂志,2009,17(2):250-252
9 柯纪定,严培玲,刘海丰.肿瘤病人家属焦虑抑郁情绪调查.中国心理卫生杂志,2007,21(4):275
10 汪向东,王希林,马弘.心理卫生评定量表手册.中国心理卫生杂志社,1999.122-124,127-131
11 lvarsson AB,Sidenvall B,Carlsson M.The factor structure of the Burden Assessment Scale and the perceived of caregivers for individuals with the severe mental disorder.Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences,2004,18(4):396-401
12 Lowyck B,De Hert M,Peeters E,et al.A study of the family burden of 150 family members of schizophrenic patients.European Psychiatry,2004,19(7):395-401
13 包锡卿,高春霓,高小妹,等.住院精神分裂症患者家庭成员情绪障碍多因素分析.中国心理卫生杂志,1999,13(3):171-172

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【加入收藏
您是第访问者

《中国临床心理学杂志》编辑部
地址:湖南省长沙市中南大学湘雅二医院内, 410011
电 话:0731-85292472    电子邮件:cjcp_china@163.com
本系统由北京博渊星辰网络科技有限公司设计开发 技术支持电话:010-63361626